| Literature DB >> 33975332 |
Abstract
Variability of ephemeral resources provided by woody plants is related to fluctuating environmental conditions, specifically the predominant climate variables temperature and rainfall. Photoperiod has less impact but also plays a role in the onset of resource pulses. In the seasonally affected bushveld of southern Africa, declining resources could have dire consequences to various animals that depend on these resources. Understanding the impact that rainfall, temperature and photoperiod has on woody plant resources allows managers of natural areas to plan for times when resources are scarce. Using a series of General Linear Models, this baseline study investigates the effects that these variables have on flower production, numbers of new fruit/pods and numbers of new leaves for 113 tagged trees from 26 woody plant species. Leads, lags and coincidental relationships observed between environmental predictor and phenological response variables were explored using time-series cross-correlations and concomitant correlograms. Model results indicated that temperature was the predominant indicator for flowering, with initial flowering starting when temperatures increase in September. A significant lead was observed between flowering and rainfall, suggesting that flower numbers increase approximately one month before rainfall increases. Temperature had the biggest effect on the number of species with new fruits and pods. Significant lags were observed between new fruits and pods and all environmental variables investigated, indicating that these resources depend on rainfall, temperature and photoperiod to reach their full potential. Photoperiod, temperature and the interaction between these variables had a noticeable effect on the number of species with new leaves. Peaks in species with new leaves coincide with peaks in rainfall, temperature and photoperiod. No leading or lagging indicators were observed between new leaves and the environmental variables investigated. In areas containing wildlife populations, recommendations are to undertake regular monitoring of climatic variables investigated, and the ephemeral resources on woody plant species.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33975332 PMCID: PMC8112890 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251421
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Location of the LDNR within the Mpumalanga province of South Africa [25].
Family names, species names and numbers of trees sampled for each species in this study.
| Anacardiaceae | 4 | |
| Anacardiaceae | 3 | |
| Anacardiaceae | 5 | |
| Anacardiaceae | 5 | |
| Cannabaceae | 5 | |
| Combretaceae | 2 | |
| Combretaceae | 4 | |
| Combretaceae | 4 | |
| Ebenaceae | 5 | |
| >Ebenaceae | 3 | |
| Fabaceae | 7 | |
| Fabaceae | 5 | |
| Fabaceae | 5 | |
| Fabaceae | 7 | |
| Fabaceae | 5 | |
| Fabaceae | 6 | |
| Fabaceae | 5 | |
| Malvaceae | 1 | |
| Moraceae | 2 | |
| Olacaceae | 4 | |
| Oleaceae | 4 | |
| Rhamnaceae | 5 | |
| Rhamnaceae | 5 | |
| Salicaceae | 5 | |
| Sapindaceae | 6 | |
| Ulmaceae | 1 |
Fig 2Numbers of woody plant species containing resources (flowers, new fruit/pods and new leaves) for the study period.
Fig 3Effects of rainfall, temperature and photoperiod on percentage of woody plant species flowering, with new fruit/pods and with new leaves.
Results for the minimum adequate models for a series of general linear models run to determine the effects of rainfall, temperature and photoperiod on the number of woody plant species flowering, with new fruit/pods and with new leaves.
| -0.09 | 5.03 | N/A | (-10.11, 9.80) | 0.99 | ||
| Rainfall | -0.39 | 0.27 | -4.65 | (-0.96, 0.10) | 0.15 | |
| Temperature | 0.76 | 0.32 | 0.74 | (0.18, 1.46) | 0.02 | |
| Photoperiod | -1.24 | 0.92 | -0.35 | (-3.12, 0.48) | 0.17 | |
| Rainfall:Temperature | -0.02 | 0.01 | -0.19 | (-0.03, 0.00) | 0.05 | |
| Rainfall:Photoperiod | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.06 | (0.00, 0.13) | 0.09 | |
| -0.44 | 0.69 | N/A | (-1.86, 0.86) | 0.52 | ||
| Rainfall | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.02 | (-0.01, 0.00) | 0.37 | |
| Temperature | 0.12 | 0.03 | 0.11 | (0.06, 0.18) | <0.00 | |
| -129.30 | 58.28 | N/A | (-277.60, -28.49) | 0.03 | ||
| Rainfall | -1.76 | 1.34 | -8.90 | (-4.50, 0.93) | 0.19 | |
| Temperature | 3.73 | 1.80 | 1.53 | (0.73, 8.72) | 0.04 | |
| Photoperiod | 12.51 | 5.73 | 1.49 | (2.35, 26.36) | 0.03 | |
| Rainfall:Temperature | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.61 | (-0.02, 0.27) | 0.10 | |
| Rainfall:Photoperiod | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.04 | (-0.11, 0.28) | 0.35 | |
| Temperature:Photoperiod | -0.39 | 0.19 | -0.05 | (-0.86, -0.06) | 0.04 | |
| Rainfall:Temperature:Photoperiod | -0.01 | 0.00 | -0.04 | (-0.02, 0.00) | 0.13 | |
B = Beta value, SEB = Standard Error of Beta, β = Standardized Beta, CI = Confidence Intervals, P = Significance
* = Significant result
Lag and lead results for flowering, new fruit/pods and new leaves with rainfall, temperature and photoperiod.
If a lag or lead was present, it is indicated in the ‘position’ column. Noticeable lags and leads were found for flowering and rainfall, and for new fruit/pods with rainfall, temperature and photoperiod. No lags were found for new leaves.
| Phenological event | Rainfall | Temperature | Photoperiod | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lag/Lead | Lag/Lead | Lag/Lead | ||||||||||||||||
| Position | Period | Position | Period | Position | Period | |||||||||||||
| Flowering | 1 | 10 months | 0.65 | 10 | 0.24 | <0.00 | 0 | 12 months | 0.82 | 10 | 0.18 | <0.00 | 0 | 12 months | 0.88 | 10 | 0.15 | <0.00 |
| New fruit/prods | -2 | 12 months | 0.76 | 10 | 0.20 | <0.00 | -1 | 15 months | 0.83 | 10 | 0.17 | <0.00 | -2 | 14 months | 0.86 | 10 | 0.16 | <0.00 |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | -1 | 14 months | 0.87 | 10 | 0.15 | <0.00 |
| New leaves | 0 | 10 months | 0.65 | 10 | 0.24 | <0.00 | 0 | 13 months | 0.81 | 10 | 0.19 | <0.00 | 0 | 12 months | 0.94 | 10 | 0.11 | <0.00 |
r = correlation coefficient, DF = Degrees of Freedom, SE = Standard Error, P = significance
Fig 4Correlogram indicating a prominent, moderately significant lead between flowering and rainfall at position 1.
Fig 5Correlogram indicating moderately significant lags between a) new fruit/pods and rainfall at position -2, b) new fruit/pods and temperature at position -1, and c) new fruit/pods and photoperiod at positions -2 and -1.