Literature DB >> 33975090

A review of surrogate safety measures and their applications in connected and automated vehicles safety modeling.

Chen Wang1, Yuanchang Xie2, Helai Huang3, Pan Liu4.   

Abstract

Surrogate Safety Measures (SSM) are important for safety performance evaluation, since crashes are rare events and historical crash data does not capture near crashes that are also critical for improving safety. This paper focuses on SSM and their applications, particularly in Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAV) safety modeling. It aims to provide a comprehensive and systematic review of significant SSM studies, identify limitations and opportunities for future SSM and CAV research, and assist researchers and practitioners with choosing the most appropriate SSM for safety studies. The behaviors of CAV can be very different from those of Human-Driven Vehicles (HDV). Even among CAV with different automation/connectivity levels, their behaviors are likely to differ. Also, the behaviors of HDV can change in response to the existence of CAV in mixed autonomy traffic. Simulation by far is the most viable solution to model CAV safety. However, it is questionable whether conventional SSM can be applied to modeling CAV safety based on simulation results due to the lack of sophisticated simulation tools that can accurately model CAV behaviors and SSM that can take CAV's powerful sensing and path prediction and planning capabilities into crash risk modeling, although some researchers suggested that proper simulation model calibration can be helpful to address these issues. A number of critical questions related to SSM for CAV safety research are also identified and discussed, including SSM for CAV trajectory optimization, SSM for individual vehicles and vehicle platoon, and CAV as a new data source for developing SSM.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automated vehicles; Connected vehicles; Safety; Simulation; Surrogate safety measure

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33975090     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  6 in total

1.  Rules of incidental operation risk propagation in metro networks under fully automatic operations mode.

Authors:  Wenying Chen; Jinyu Yang; Mohammad T Khasawneh; Jiaping Fu; Baoping Sun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Driving Behavior Based Relative Risk Evaluation Using a Nonparametric Optimization Method.

Authors:  Qiong Bao; Hanrun Tang; Yongjun Shen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Driver models for the definition of safety requirements of automated vehicles in international regulations. Application to motorway driving conditions.

Authors:  Konstantinos Mattas; Giovanni Albano; Riccardo Donà; Maria Christina Galassi; Ricardo Suarez-Bertoa; Sandor Vass; Biagio Ciuffo
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2022-06-11

4.  The effectiveness of fixed speed cameras on Iranian taxi drivers: An evaluation of the influential factors.

Authors:  Mohammad-Reza Malekpour; Sina Azadnajafabad; Sahba Rezazadeh-Khadem; Kavi Bhalla; Erfan Ghasemi; Seyed Taghai Heydari; Seyyed-Hadi Ghamari; Mohsen Abbasi-Kangevari; Nazila Rezaei; Mahmoud Manian; Saeid Shahraz; Negar Rezaei; Kamran B Lankarani; Farshad Farzadfar
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-08-30

5.  Pandemic effects to autonomous vehicles test operations in California.

Authors:  Adrian Chen Yang Tan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Assessing Driving Risk at the Second Phase of Overtaking on Two-Lane Highways for Young Novice Drivers Based on Driving Simulation.

Authors:  Jie Pan; Yongjun Shen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.