Literature DB >> 33974918

Client satisfaction and experience of telemedicine and home use of mifepristone and misoprostol for abortion up to 10 weeks' gestation at British Pregnancy Advisory Service: A cross-sectional evaluation.

Marielle E Meurice1, Katherine C Whitehouse2, Rebecca Blaylock2, Jenny J Chang3, Patricia A Lohr2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate satisfaction and experience with telemedicine consultation and home use of mifepristone and misoprostol for abortion to 10 weeks' gestation. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional evaluation of British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) clients who used mifepristone and misoprostol at home from 11 May to 10 July 2020. We sent a text message with a link to a web-survey 2 to 3 weeks postabortion. Questions assessed satisfaction and experiences with a service model including telephone consultation and provision of medicines by mail or collection from the clinic. We used bivariate and multivariate regression to explore associations between client characteristics and outcomes. Our primary outcomes were overall satisfaction (5-point Likert scale) and reported contact with a health care provider.
RESULTS: A total of 1,333 clients participated. Respondents described home use of medications as "straightforward" (75.8%) and most were "very satisfied" (78.3%) or "satisfied" (18.6%) overall. Being "very satisfied" was associated with parity (aOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.09-2.14) and pain control satisfaction (aOR 2.22, 95% CI 1.44-3.44). Health care provider contact was reported by 14.7%; mainly to BPAS' telephone aftercare service (76.8%). Dissatisfaction with pain control (aOR 3.62, 95% CI 1.79-7.29) and waiting >1 week to use mifepristone (aOR3.71, 95% CI 1.48-9.28) were associated with health care provider contact. If needed in the future, most would prefer consultation by phone (74.3%) and home use of mifepristone and misoprostol (77.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: Satisfaction with telemedicine and home use of mifepristone and misoprostol is high. Most clients do not need health care provider support when administering medicines at home or post abortion.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medical abortion; Medication abortion; Mifpristone; Misoprostool; No-touch abortion; Telemedicine abortion

Year:  2021        PMID: 33974918     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.04.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  2 in total

1.  Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of no-test medical abortion (termination of pregnancy) provided via telemedicine: a national cohort study.

Authors:  Ara Aiken; P A Lohr; J Lord; N Ghosh; J Starling
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 7.331

2.  The Case for Telemedical Early Medical Abortion in England: Dispelling Adult Safeguarding Concerns.

Authors:  Jordan A Parsons; Elizabeth Chloe Romanis
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2021-10-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.