| Literature DB >> 33974297 |
Oliver Berkowitz1,2,3, Yue Xu1,3, Lim Chee Liew1,3, Yan Wang1,3, Yanqiao Zhu1,3, Bhavna Hurgobin2,3, Mathew G Lewsey2,3, James Whelan1,2,3.
Abstract
Acclimation of plants to adverse conditions requires the coordination of gene expression and signalling pathways between tissues and cell types. As the energy and carbon capturing organs, leaves are significantly affected by abiotic and biotic stresses. However, tissue- or cell type-specific analyses of stress responses have focussed on the Arabidopsis root. Here, we comparatively explore the transcriptomes of three leaf tissues (epidermis, mesophyll, vasculature) after induction of diverse stress pathways by chemical stimuli (antimycin A, 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole, methyl viologen, salicylic acid) and ultraviolet light in Arabidopsis using laser capture microdissection followed by RNA sequencing. Stimulation of stress pathways caused an overall reduction in the number of genes expressed in a tissue-specific manner, though a small subset gained or changed their tissue specificity. We find no evidence of a common stress response, with only a few genes consistently responsive to two or more treatments in the analysed tissues. However, differentially expressed genes overlap between tissues for individual treatments. A focussed analysis provided evidence for an interaction of auxin and ethylene that mediates retrograde signalling during mitochondrial dysfunction specifically in the epidermis, and a gene regulatory network defined the hierarchy of interactions. Taken together, we have generated an extensive reference dataset that will be valuable for future experiments analysing transcriptional responses on a tissue or single-cell level. Our results will enable the tailoring of the tissue-specific engineering of stress-tolerant plants.Entities:
Keywords: Arabidopsis thaliana; RNA-seq; laser capture microdissection; mitochondrial retrograde signalling; stress response; tissue-specific gene expression
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33974297 DOI: 10.1111/tpj.15314
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant J ISSN: 0960-7412 Impact factor: 6.417