| Literature DB >> 33974158 |
Keiichi Matsuzaki1,2, Hitoshi Suzuki1,2, Tetsuya Kawamura3,2, Yasuhiko Tomino1,2, Yusuke Suzuki4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Novel criteria for the remission of Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) based on an opinion survey of Japanese nephrologists and literature review were proposed in 2013. This single-center, longitudinal retrospective cohort study was conducted to validate this criteria.Entities:
Keywords: IgA nephropathy; Remission criteria; Renal prognosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33974158 PMCID: PMC8357773 DOI: 10.1007/s10157-021-02069-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Exp Nephrol ISSN: 1342-1751 Impact factor: 2.801
Fig. 1Flow diagram of the study. A total of 103 patients were diagnosed with IgA nephropathy during the study period, of whom 74 were included in the final analysis. Nine, 16, and eight patients achieved clinical remission (CR), remission of proteinuria only (UP-R), or remission of hematuria only (UH-R), respectively. Forty-one patients achieved neither remission of proteinuria nor hematuria (NR)
Baseline characteristics of the patients and outcomes
| All patients ( | Clinical remission ( | Remission of proteinuria only ( | Remission of hematuria only ( | Non-remission ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 30 (25–42) | 30 (22–37) | 29 (24–37) | 29 (24–37) | 33 (26–48) | 0.20 |
| Sex (male %) | 35 (47.3%) | 4 (44.4) | 8 (50.0) | 3 (37.5) | 20 (57.1) | 0.94 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 119.1 (± 15.6) | 117.0 (± 16.4) | 114.2 (± 14.3) | 119.5 (± 8.8) | 121.3 (± 16.9) | 0.47 |
| TP (g/dL) | 6.9 (± 0.6) | 7.1 (± 0.3) | 6.9 (± 0.7) | 6.9 (± 0.7) | 6.8 (± 0.7) | 0.62 |
| Alb (g/dL) | 4.1 (± 0.5) | 4.3 (± 0.4) | 4.3 (± 0.5) | 4.2 (± 0.5) | 4.0 (± 0.4) | 0.05 |
| S-Cre (mg/dL) | 0.79 (± 0.26) | 0.71 (± 0.16) | 0.75 (± 0.32) | 0.78 (± 0.19) | 0.83 (± 0.26) | 0.51 |
| eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) | 87.8 (± 26.8) | 94.1 (± 18.1) | 99.6 (± 29.6) | 94.1 (± 26.5) | 80.6 (± 25.9) | 0.07 |
| IgA (mg/dL) | 312.5 (± 96.0) | 348.3 (± 82.2) | 273.4 (± 77.1) | 264.6 (± 105.6) | 329.2 (± 98.1) | 0.06 |
| C3 (mg/dL) | 102.5 (± 16.5) | 109.3 (± 17.6) | 92.6 (± 9.6) | 102.5 (± 15.6) | 104.9 (± 17.5) | 0.04 |
| IgA/C3 | 3.1 (± 0.96) | 3.3 (± 0.93) | 3.0 (± 0.94) | 2.6 (± 1.0) | 3.2 (± 0.97) | 0.47 |
| UP (g/day) | 0.59 (0.21–1.30) | 0.21 (0.14–0.28) | 0.51 (0–1.2) | 0.63 (0.12–1.14) | 0.89 (0.37–1.9) | 0.02 |
| UOB | ||||||
| > 30/HPF ( | 53 (76.8) | 7 (77.8) | 12 (80.0) | 4 (50.0) | 30 (81.1) | 0.11 |
| 21–30/HPF ( | 2 (2.9) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (12.5) | 1 (2.7) | |
| 16–20/HPF ( | 5 (7.3) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (13.3) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (8.1) | |
| 11–15/HPF ( | 3 (4.4) | 1 (11.1) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (25.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| 6–10/HPF ( | 3 (4.4) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (6.7) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (5.4) | |
| 1–5/HPF ( | 3 (4.4) | 1 (11.1) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (12.5) | 1 (2.7) | |
| Pathological findings | ||||||
| M1 ( | 14 (18.9%) | 2 (22.2%) | 4 (25.0%) | 3 (37.5%) | 5 (12.2%) | 0.24 |
| E1 ( | 19 (25.7%) | 3 (33.3%) | 5 (31.3%) | 1 (12.5%) | 10 (24.4%) | 0.79 |
| S1 ( | 61 (82.4%) | 9 (100%) | 13 (81.2%) | 5 (62.5%) | 34 (82.9%) | 0.24 |
| T1 ( | 40 (54.1%) | 4 (44.4%) | 5 (31.3%) | 5 (62.5%) | 26 (63.4%) | 0.13 |
| T2 ( | 3 (4.1%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (5.9%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (4.9%) | 1.00 |
| C1 ( | 40 (54.1%) | 4 (44.4%) | 11 (68.8%) | 3 (37.5%) | 22 (53.4%) | 0.46 |
| Follow-up months | 86.5 (71–104) | 94 (88–100) | 82 (72–93) | 91 (114–127) | 83.0 (69–111) | 0.70 |
| Treatment options | ||||||
| Tonsillectomy with steroid pulse therapy ( | 16 (21.6%) | 2 (22.2%) | 3 (18.8%) | 3 (37.5%) | 8 (19.5%) | 0.89 |
| Steroid pulse monothrapy ( | 6 (8.1%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (6.3%) | 3 (37.5%) | 2 (4.9%) | 0.04 |
| Tonsillectomy only ( | 4 (5.4%) | 1 (11.1%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (7.3%) | 0.48 |
| Anti-platelet agent ( | 37 (50.0%) | 3 (33.3%) | 8 (50.0%) | 6 (75.0%) | 20 (48.8%) | 0.53 |
| RAS-I ( | 32 (43.2%) | 1 (11.1%) | 4 (25.0%) | 6 (75.0%) | 21 (51.2%) | < 0.001 |
| 50% increase in serum creatinine from baseline ( | 12 (16.2%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (6.3%) | 0 (0%) | 11 (26.8%) | 0.07 |
| 30% decrease in eGFR from baseline ( | 18 (24.0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (2.7%) | 3 (4.1%) | 13 (17.6%) | 0.09 |
| Slope of decline in eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2/year) | − 1.74 (± 2.56) | − 1.16 (± 1.9) | − 0.53 (± 2.2) | − 2.10 (± 1.9) | − 2.27 (± 2.8) | 0.04 |
Fig. 2Cumulative renal survival rates according to remission status. Abbreviations: CR Clinical remission, UP-R Remission of proteinuria only, UH-R Remission of hematuria only, NR non-remission
Univariate analysis of the associations of clinical factors with the slope of the decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) per year
| Factor | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (male) | 0.13 | − 1.07 to 1.33 | 0.83 |
| Age | − 0.01 | − 0.06 to 0.03 | 0.55 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 0.01 | − 0.03 to 0.05 | 0.64 |
| S-Cre (mg/dL) | − 0.65 | − 2.95 to 1.65 | 0.58 |
| eGFR at baseline | − 0.01 | − 0.03 to 0.02 | 0.66 |
| TP (g/dL) | 0.95 | − 0.02 to 1.88 | 0.05 |
| Alb (g/dL) | 1.1 | − 0.20 to 2.4 | 0.10 |
| UP (g/day) | − 0.53 | − 0.99 to − 0.05 | 0.03 |
| UOB (per degree) | 0.08 | − 0.33 to 0.48 | 0.71 |
| Pathological findings | |||
| M1 | 0.63 | − 0.89 to 2.15 | 0.41 |
| E1 | − 0.02 | − 0.16 to 0.13 | 0.83 |
| S1 | − 0.71 | − 2.28 to 0.85 | 0.37 |
| T1 | 0.02 | − 1.18 to 1.22 | 0.98 |
| T2 | − 0.31 | − 3.34 to 2.72 | 0.84 |
| C1 | − 0.17 | − 1.37 to 1.03 | 0.77 |
| Non-remission (NR) | (Reference) | – | – |
| Remission of the hematuria only (UH-R) | − 0.40 | − 2.33 to 1.52 | 0.68 |
| Remission of the proteinuria only (UP-R) | 1.54 | 0.13 to 2.94 | 0.03 |
| Clinical remission (CR) | 0.66 | − 1.16 to 2.48 | 0.47 |
Multiple regression analysis of the association between the remission status and the slope of the decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) per year
| Remission status | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-remission (NR) | (Reference) | – | – |
| Remission of the hematuria only (UH-R) | − 0.48 | − 2.37 to 1.41 | 0.62 |
| Remission of the proteinuria only (UP-R) | 1.61 | 0.22 to 3.00 | 0.02 |
| Clinical remission (CR) | 0.13 | − 1.68 to 1.93 | 0.89 |