Literature DB >> 33973636

Crowdsourced Tick Image-Informed Updates to U.S. County Records of Three Medically Important Tick Species.

Heather L Kopsco1,2,3, Roland J Duhaime2,4, Thomas N Mather1,2.   

Abstract

Burgeoning cases of tick-borne disease present a significant public health problem in the United States. Passive tick surveillance gained traction as an effective way to collect epidemiologic data, and in particular, photograph-based tick surveillance can complement in-hand tick specimen identification to amass distribution data and related encounter demographics. We compared the Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) code of tick photos submitted to a free public identification service (TickSpotters) from 2014 to 2019 to published nationwide county reports for three tick species of medical concern: Ixodes scapularis Say (Ixodida: Ixodidae), Ixodes pacificus Cooley and Kohls (Ixodida: Ixodidae), and Amblyomma americanum Linneaus (Ixodida: Ixodidae). We tallied the number of TickSpotters submissions for each tick species according to "Reported" or "Established" criteria per county, and found that TickSpotters submissions represented more than half of the reported counties of documented occurrence, and potentially identified hundreds of new counties with the occurrence of these species. We detected the largest number of new county reports of I. scapularis presence in Michigan, North Carolina, and Texas. Tick image submissions revealed potentially nine new counties of occurrence for I. pacificus, and we documented the largest increase in new county reports of A. americanum in Kentucky, Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio. These findings demonstrate the utility of crowdsourced photograph-based tick surveillance as a complement to other tick surveillance strategies in documenting tick distributions on a nationwide scale, its potential for identifying new foci, and its ability to highlight at-risk localities that might benefit from tick-bite prevention education.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  community science; public health entomology; surveillance; ticks

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33973636     DOI: 10.1093/jme/tjab082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Entomol        ISSN: 0022-2585            Impact factor:   2.278


  6 in total

1.  Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of veterinary professionals towards ticks and tick-borne diseases in Illinois.

Authors:  Samantha D Crist; Heather Kopsco; Alexandria Miller; Peg Gronemeyer; Nohra Mateus-Pinilla; Rebecca L Smith
Journal:  One Health       Date:  2022-04-24

2.  Monitoring Trends in Distribution and Seasonality of Medically Important Ticks in North America Using Online Crowdsourced Records from iNaturalist.

Authors:  Benjamin Cull
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Tick-Borne Disease Prevention Behaviors Among Participants in a Tick Surveillance System Compared with a Sample Of Master Gardeners.

Authors:  Heather L Kopsco; Thomas N Mather
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2021-11-02

Review 4.  All for One Health and One Health for All: Considerations for Successful Citizen Science Projects Conducting Vector Surveillance from Animal Hosts.

Authors:  Karen C Poh; Jesse R Evans; Michael J Skvarla; Erika T Machtinger
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  The wild life of ticks: Using passive surveillance to determine the distribution and wildlife host range of ticks and the exotic Haemaphysalis longicornis, 2010-2021.

Authors:  Alec T Thompson; Seth A White; Emily E Doub; Prisha Sharma; Kenna Frierson; Kristen Dominguez; David Shaw; Dustin Weaver; Stacey L Vigil; Denise L Bonilla; Mark G Ruder; Michael J Yabsley
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 4.047

6.  Effects of tick surveillance education on knowledge, attitudes, and practices of local health department employees.

Authors:  Lee Ann Lyons; Nohra Mateus-Pinilla; Rebecca L Smith
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.