Jacqueline M Burgette1,2, Jacquelin Rankine3, Alison J Culyba3, Kar-Hai Chu4, Kathleen M Carley5. 1. Department of Dental Public Health, 6614University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine, PA, USA. 2. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, 12317University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine, PA, USA. 3. Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, 12317University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA, USA. 4. Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, 6614University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, PA, USA. 5. Center for Computational Analysis of Social and Organizational Systems, School of Computer Science, 6612Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE/AIM: We describe best practices for modeling egocentric networks and health outcomes using a five-step guide. BACKGROUND: Social network analysis (SNA) is common in social science fields and has more recently been used to study health-related topics including obesity, violence, substance use, health organizational behavior, and healthcare utilization. SNA, alone or in conjunction with spatial analysis, can be used to uniquely evaluate the impact of the physical or built environment on health. The environment can shape the presence, quality, and function of social relationships with spatial and network processes interacting to affect health outcomes. While there are some common measures frequently used in modeling the impact of social networks on health outcomes, there is no standard approach to social network modeling in health research, which impacts rigor and reproducibility. METHODS: We provide an overview of social network concepts and terminology focused on egocentric network data. Egocentric, or personal networks, take the perspective of an individual who identifies their own connections (alters) and also the relationships between alters. RESULTS: We describe best practices for modeling egocentric networks and health outcomes according to the following five-step guide: (1) model selection, (2) social network exposure variable and selection considerations, (3) covariate selection related to sociodemographic and health characteristics, (4) covariate selection related to social network characteristics, and (5) analytic considerations. We also present an example of SNA. CONCLUSIONS: SNA provides a powerful repertoire of techniques to examine how relationships impact attitudes, experiences, and behaviors-and subsequently health.
OBJECTIVE/AIM: We describe best practices for modeling egocentric networks and health outcomes using a five-step guide. BACKGROUND: Social network analysis (SNA) is common in social science fields and has more recently been used to study health-related topics including obesity, violence, substance use, health organizational behavior, and healthcare utilization. SNA, alone or in conjunction with spatial analysis, can be used to uniquely evaluate the impact of the physical or built environment on health. The environment can shape the presence, quality, and function of social relationships with spatial and network processes interacting to affect health outcomes. While there are some common measures frequently used in modeling the impact of social networks on health outcomes, there is no standard approach to social network modeling in health research, which impacts rigor and reproducibility. METHODS: We provide an overview of social network concepts and terminology focused on egocentric network data. Egocentric, or personal networks, take the perspective of an individual who identifies their own connections (alters) and also the relationships between alters. RESULTS: We describe best practices for modeling egocentric networks and health outcomes according to the following five-step guide: (1) model selection, (2) social network exposure variable and selection considerations, (3) covariate selection related to sociodemographic and health characteristics, (4) covariate selection related to social network characteristics, and (5) analytic considerations. We also present an example of SNA. CONCLUSIONS: SNA provides a powerful repertoire of techniques to examine how relationships impact attitudes, experiences, and behaviors-and subsequently health.
Entities:
Keywords:
ego; health; humans; models; social networking; social support; statistical
Authors: R M Christley; G L Pinchbeck; R G Bowers; D Clancy; N P French; R Bennett; J Turner Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2005-09-21 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Grace C Huang; Jennifer B Unger; Daniel Soto; Kayo Fujimoto; Mary Ann Pentz; Maryalice Jordan-Marsh; Thomas W Valente Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2013-09-03 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Alene Kennedy-Hendricks; Heather Schwartz; Rachel Johnson Thornton; Beth Ann Griffin; Harold D Green; David P Kennedy; Susan Burkhauser; Craig Evan Pollack Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-09-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Carl A Latkin; Deborah Donnell; David Metzger; Susan Sherman; Apinun Aramrattna; Annet Davis-Vogel; Vu Minh Quan; Sharavi Gandham; Tasanai Vongchak; Tom Perdue; David D Celentano Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2008-12-13 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: A James O'Malley; Samuel Arbesman; Darby Miller Steiger; James H Fowler; Nicholas A Christakis Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-05-15 Impact factor: 3.240