Literature DB >> 33973279

Systematic review confirmed the benefits of early skin-to-skin contact but highlighted lack of studies on very and extremely preterm infants.

Nidhi Gupta1, Aniko Deierl1, Emily Hills1, Jayanta Banerjee1,2.   

Abstract

AIM: We systematically reviewed the literature to identify the benefits of early skin-to-skin contact (SSC) for all gestational ages.
METHODS: The MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases were searched for papers published in English from 1 January 1975 to 31 March 2020. Early SSC was defined as when the infant was placed directly onto the mother's chest within 180 minutes of birth. Two authors independently searched the databases, appraised study quality and extracted the study design and outcome data. The primary outcomes were the infants' physiological stability after birth: thermoregulation and stabilisation. The secondary outcomes were exclusive breastfeeding and mother-infant interaction.
RESULTS: We reviewed 30 studies that assessed the benefits of early SSC: 22 comprised term-born healthy infants and eight focused on preterm or ill infants. These included various gestational ages, birth methods and cultural backgrounds. The studies demonstrated that early SSC stabilised neonatal physiological parameters, promoted exclusive breastfeeding and supported bonding. Most of the data were from term and late preterm births.
CONCLUSION: This systematic review showed that early SSC could be beneficial. Further studies that focus on providing very and extremely preterm infants with SSC, and parental experiences, are needed to enable SSC to be adopted as routine practice. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  delivery room; family-centred care; neonatal; preterm; skin-to-skin contact

Year:  2021        PMID: 33973279     DOI: 10.1111/apa.15913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Paediatr        ISSN: 0803-5253            Impact factor:   2.299


  7 in total

1.  Using art to raise awareness of breastfed children with medical complexity.

Authors:  Lyndsey Hookway
Journal:  Int Breastfeed J       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.790

Review 2.  COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Restrictions: Factors That May Affect Perinatal Maternal Mental Health and Implications for Infant Development.

Authors:  Theano Kokkinaki; Eleftheria Hatzidaki
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.569

Review 3.  Adult Health and Early Life Adversity: Behind the Curtains of Maternal Care Research.

Authors:  Theodore C Dumas
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Impact of suspending labour companionship during the COVID-19 pandemic on intrapartum care and delivery outcomes.

Authors:  Khin-Shwe Eu; Carmen Diana Chung
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 1.884

5.  An international study on implementation and facilitators and barriers for parent-infant closeness in neonatal units.

Authors:  Nicole R van Veenendaal; Nanon H M Labrie; Silke Mader; Anne A M W van Kempen; Sophie R D van der Schoor; Johannes B van Goudoever
Journal:  Pediatr Investig       Date:  2022-08-13

Review 6.  Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Breastfeeding Support Services and Women's Experiences of Breastfeeding: A Review.

Authors:  Welma Lubbe; Hannakaisa Niela-Vilén; Gill Thomson; Elina Botha
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2022-10-06

Review 7.  Protecting Breastfeeding during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review of Perinatal Care Recommendations in the Context of Maternal and Child Well-Being.

Authors:  Aleksandra Wesołowska; Magdalena Orczyk-Pawiłowicz; Agnieszka Bzikowska-Jura; Małgorzata Gawrońska; Bartłomiej Walczak
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.