Literature DB >> 33973159

Subtypes of inhibitory and reward activation associated with substance use variation in adolescence: A latent profile analysis of brain imaging data.

Meghan E Martz1, Lora M Cope2, Jillian E Hardee2, Sarah J Brislin2, Alexander Weigard2, Robert A Zucker2, Mary M Heitzeg2.   

Abstract

The present study identified subgroups based on inhibitory and reward activation, two key neural functions involved in risk-taking behavior, and then tested the extent to which subgroup differences varied by age, sex, behavioral and familial risk, and substance use. Participants were 145 young adults (18-21 years old; 40.0% female) from the Michigan Longitudinal Study. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to establish subgroups using task-based brain activations. Demographic and substance use differences between subgroups were then examined in logistic regression analyses. Whole-brain task activations during a functional magnetic resonance imaging go/no-go task and monetary incentive delay task were used to identify beta weights as input for LPA modeling. A four-class model showed the best fit with the data. Subgroups were categorized as: (1) low inhibitory activation/moderate reward activation (39.7%), (2) moderate inhibitory activation/low reward activation (22.7%), (3) moderate inhibitory activation/high reward activation (25.2%), and (4) high inhibitory activation/high reward activation (12.4%). Compared with the other subgroups, Class 2 was older, less likely to have parental alcohol use disorder, and had less alcohol use. Class 4 was the youngest and had greater marijuana use. Classes 1 and 3 did not differ significantly from the other subgroups. These findings demonstrate that LPA applied to brain activations can be used to identify distinct neural profiles that may explain heterogeneity in substance use outcomes and may inform more targeted substance use prevention and intervention efforts.
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive control; Development; Latent profile analysis; Reward; Substance use

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33973159      PMCID: PMC9036797          DOI: 10.3758/s13415-021-00907-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.526


  57 in total

1.  FMRI visualization of brain activity during a monetary incentive delay task.

Authors:  B Knutson; A Westdorp; E Kaiser; D Hommer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Spiral-in/out BOLD fMRI for increased SNR and reduced susceptibility artifacts.

Authors:  G H Glover; C S Law
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Cerebrovascular perfusion in marijuana users during a month of monitored abstinence.

Authors:  Ronald I Herning; Warren E Better; Kimberly Tate; Jean L Cadet
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Distinct neuropsychological subgroups in typically developing youth inform heterogeneity in children with ADHD.

Authors:  Damien A Fair; Deepti Bathula; Molly A Nikolas; Joel T Nigg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Reward activation in childhood predicts adolescent substance use initiation in a high-risk sample.

Authors:  Lora M Cope; Meghan E Martz; Jillian E Hardee; Robert A Zucker; Mary M Heitzeg
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Incentive-elicited striatal activation in adolescent children of alcoholics.

Authors:  James M Bjork; Brian Knutson; Daniel W Hommer
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.526

7.  Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood.

Authors:  Nitin Gogtay; Jay N Giedd; Leslie Lusk; Kiralee M Hayashi; Deanna Greenstein; A Catherine Vaituzis; Tom F Nugent; David H Herman; Liv S Clasen; Arthur W Toga; Judith L Rapoport; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Striatal dopaminergic reward response relates to age of first drunkenness and feedback response in at-risk youth.

Authors:  Barbara J Weiland; Robert A Zucker; Jon-Kar Zubieta; Mary M Heitzeg
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 4.280

9.  Development of impulse control circuitry in children of alcoholics.

Authors:  Jillian E Hardee; Barbara J Weiland; Thomas E Nichols; Robert C Welsh; Mary E Soules; Davia B Steinberg; Jon-Kar Zubieta; Robert A Zucker; Mary M Heitzeg
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  The acute effects of nicotine on corticostriatal responses to distinct phases of reward processing.

Authors:  Kainan S Wang; Maya Zegel; Elena Molokotos; Lauren V Moran; David P Olson; Diego A Pizzagalli; Amy C Janes
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 8.294

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.