Literature DB >> 33973085

Effects of nasal packing and transseptal suturing on swallowing after septoplasty.

Hüseyin Sari1, Yavuz Atar1, Tolgar Lütfi Kumral1, Ugur Uygan1, Semih Karaketir2, Şeyma Gorcin Karaketir3, Yavuz Uyar1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This clinical trial aimed to investigate the effects of different nasal packing methods and transseptal suture technique on swallowing after septoplasty.
METHODS: This randomized prospective study consists of 180 consecutive patients with septal deviation. All the patients underwent septoplasty. All the patients were randomly assigned to three groups. In group A, transseptal sutures were used for septal stabilization. In group B, both nasal passages were packed with Merocel tampons for septal stabilization. In group C, both nasal passages were packed with Doyle silicone splints for septal stabilization. For the evaluation of swallowing, the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) questionnaire and a visual analog scale (VAS) were administered to all the patients preoperatively and on the second and seventh postoperative days.
RESULTS: One hundred and twenty two of the patients (67.7%) were female and 58 of them (32.2%) were male. The mean age was 32.41 ± 12.37 years (range: 18-57 years). Both EAT-10 and VAS scores on the second postoperative day were significantly higher than the preoperative scores in all the groups (p < 0.05). The transseptal suture group had significantly lower EAT-10 and VAS scores on the second postoperative day than the Merocel packing and silicone packing groups (p < 0.05). Both EAT-10 and VAS scores on the postop 7th day significantly decreased in all groups compared to the postop second day (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Septoplasty affects swallowing, regardless of whether a tampon is applied. Transeptal suturing has a lesser effect on swallowing than other techniques. Although silicone packing is a less invasive method, it negatively affects swallowing, similar to Merocel packing. The transseptal suture technique is more comfortable than the other techniques in terms of swallowing function in the postoperative period.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EAT-10; Septal deviation; Swallowing; Transseptal suture

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33973085     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06854-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  16 in total

1.  The SWAL-QOL outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: II. Item reduction and preliminary scaling.

Authors:  C A McHorney; D E Bricker; J Robbins; A E Kramer; J C Rosenbek; K A Chignell
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  An evaluation of post-operative packing in nasal septal surgery.

Authors:  D A Nunez; F W Martin
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1991-12

Review 3.  Septoplasty: Basic and Advanced Techniques.

Authors:  Sam P Most; Shannon F Rudy
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 1.918

4.  Dysphagia Prevalence, Attitudes, and Related Quality of Life in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Athanasia Printza; Stefanos Triaridis; Maria Kalaitzi; Ioannis Nikolaidis; Christos Bakirtzis; Jannis Constantinidis; Nikolaos Grigoriadis
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Eating Assessment Tool (T-EAT-10).

Authors:  Numan Demir; Selen Serel Arslan; Özgü İnal; A Ayşe Karaduman
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.438

6.  Influence of Deviated Nasal Septum on Nasal Epithelium: An Analysis.

Authors:  Lakshit Kumar; Basavaraj P Belaldavar; Hema Bannur
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2017-05-04

7.  Social and psychological burden of dysphagia: its impact on diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Olle Ekberg; Shaheen Hamdy; Virginie Woisard; Anita Wuttge-Hannig; Primitivo Ortega
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.438

8.  Validity and reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10).

Authors:  Peter C Belafsky; Debbie A Mouadeb; Catherine J Rees; Jan C Pryor; Gregory N Postma; Jacqueline Allen; Rebecca J Leonard
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.547

9.  Anatomy and physiology of feeding and swallowing: normal and abnormal.

Authors:  Koichiro Matsuo; Jeffrey B Palmer
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.784

10.  Septoplasty with or without postoperative nasal packing? Prospective study.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Bernardo; Sandra Alves; Nuno Barros Lima; Diamantino Helena; Artur Condé
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.