| Literature DB >> 33972631 |
Guillermo León1, María Herrera1, Mariángela Vargas2, Mauricio Arguedas1, Andrés Sánchez1, Álvaro Segura1, Aarón Gómez1, Gabriela Solano1, Eugenia Corrales-Aguilar3, Kenneth Risner4, Aarthi Narayanan4, Charles Bailey4, Mauren Villalta1, Andrés Hernández1, Adriana Sánchez1, Daniel Cordero1, Daniela Solano1, Gina Durán1, Eduardo Segura1, Maykel Cerdas1, Deibid Umaña1, Edwin Moscoso1, Ricardo Estrada1, Jairo Gutiérrez1, Marcos Méndez1, Ana Cecilia Castillo1, Laura Sánchez1, Ronald Sánchez1, José María Gutiérrez1, Cecilia Díaz1, Alberto Alape1,5.
Abstract
In the current global emergency due to SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, passive immunotherapy emerges as a promising treatment for COVID-19. Among animal-derived products, equine formulations are still the cornerstone therapy for treating envenomations due to animal bites and stings. Therefore, drawing upon decades of experience in manufacturing snake antivenom, we developed and preclinically evaluated two anti-SARS-CoV-2 polyclonal equine formulations as potential alternative therapy for COVID-19. We immunized two groups of horses with either S1 (anti-S1) or a mixture of S1, N, and SEM mosaic (anti-Mix) viral recombinant proteins. Horses reached a maximum anti-viral antibody level at 7 weeks following priming, and showed no major adverse acute or chronic clinical alterations. Two whole-IgG formulations were prepared via hyperimmune plasma precipitation with caprylic acid and then formulated for parenteral use. Both preparations had similar physicochemical and microbiological quality and showed ELISA immunoreactivity towards S1 protein and the receptor binding domain (RBD). The anti-Mix formulation also presented immunoreactivity against N protein. Due to high anti-S1 and anti-RBD antibody content, final products exhibited high in vitro neutralizing capacity of SARS-CoV-2 infection, 80 times higher than a pool of human convalescent plasma. Pre-clinical quality profiles were similar among both products, but clinical efficacy and safety must be tested in clinical trials. The technological strategy we describe here can be adapted by other producers, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33972631 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89242-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379