Wendi Cheng1, Yashuang Luo1, Haiyin Wang1, Xiaoxiao Qin1, Xin Liu1, Yuyan Fu1, Claudio Ronco2. 1. Department of Health Technology Assessment, Shanghai Health Development Research Center (Shanghai Medical Information Center), Shanghai, China. 2. Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, International Renal Research Institute (IRRIV), San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The maintenance treatment of ESRD puts a great burden on individual patients, society, and the country of China as a whole. Hemoperfusion plus hemodialysis (HP + HD) in ESRD patients can yield modified outcomes such as prolonged life expectancy and improved dialysis quality and quality of life. This study aimed to systematically analyze the effect of HP + HD on the overall survival (OS) rates of ESRD patients and to provide support for clinical decision-making. METHODS: A computerized search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and SinoMed databases for relevant original research articles. Studies were included or excluded based on their compliance with predefined selection criteria. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included in the qualitative synthesis and quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis). The meta-analysis showed that the 1-year OS rate (odds ratio [OR]: 3.35, 95% CI: 1.89, 5.91, p < 0.05), 2-year OS rate (OR: 2.88, 95% CI: 1.84, 4.53, p < 0.05), and 5-year OS rate (χ2 = 4.3092, p < 0.05) of patients with ESRD treated with HP + HD were better than those treated with HD, but there was no significant difference in 3-year OS rate (OR: 1.97, 95% CI: 0.76, 5.06, p > 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed the same outcomes in different study designs (1-year OS rate: randomized controlled trials [RCTs]: OR: 4.38, 95% CI: 1.61, 11.88, p < 0.05; cohort studies: OR: 2.90, 95% CI: 1.44, 5.85, p < 0.05; 2-year OS rate: RCTs: OR: 2.99, 95% CI: 1.84, 4.84, p < 0.05) and different age-groups (1-year OS rate: 45-50 years: OR: 3.19, 95% CI: 1.55, 6.57, p < 0.05; 55-60 years: OR: 3.37, 95% CI: 1.07, 10.61, p < 0.05; 2-year OS rate: 50-55 years: OR: 2.86, 95% CI: 1.59, 5.16, p < 0.05: 60-65 years: OR: 4.41, 95% CI: 1.19, 16.30, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that the OS rates of ESRD patients treated with HP + HD were better than those of patients treated with HD. A speculative hypothesis for why this is the case may be that HP + HD can achieve the complementary elimination of metabolites, effectively preventing and treating complications caused by long-term dialysis and prolonging life expectancy. Therefore, HP + HD should be widely used in ESRD patients. The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.
BACKGROUND: The maintenance treatment of ESRD puts a great burden on individual patients, society, and the country of China as a whole. Hemoperfusion plus hemodialysis (HP + HD) in ESRD patients can yield modified outcomes such as prolonged life expectancy and improved dialysis quality and quality of life. This study aimed to systematically analyze the effect of HP + HD on the overall survival (OS) rates of ESRD patients and to provide support for clinical decision-making. METHODS: A computerized search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and SinoMed databases for relevant original research articles. Studies were included or excluded based on their compliance with predefined selection criteria. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included in the qualitative synthesis and quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis). The meta-analysis showed that the 1-year OS rate (odds ratio [OR]: 3.35, 95% CI: 1.89, 5.91, p < 0.05), 2-year OS rate (OR: 2.88, 95% CI: 1.84, 4.53, p < 0.05), and 5-year OS rate (χ2 = 4.3092, p < 0.05) of patients with ESRD treated with HP + HD were better than those treated with HD, but there was no significant difference in 3-year OS rate (OR: 1.97, 95% CI: 0.76, 5.06, p > 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed the same outcomes in different study designs (1-year OS rate: randomized controlled trials [RCTs]: OR: 4.38, 95% CI: 1.61, 11.88, p < 0.05; cohort studies: OR: 2.90, 95% CI: 1.44, 5.85, p < 0.05; 2-year OS rate: RCTs: OR: 2.99, 95% CI: 1.84, 4.84, p < 0.05) and different age-groups (1-year OS rate: 45-50 years: OR: 3.19, 95% CI: 1.55, 6.57, p < 0.05; 55-60 years: OR: 3.37, 95% CI: 1.07, 10.61, p < 0.05; 2-year OS rate: 50-55 years: OR: 2.86, 95% CI: 1.59, 5.16, p < 0.05: 60-65 years: OR: 4.41, 95% CI: 1.19, 16.30, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that the OS rates of ESRD patients treated with HP + HD were better than those of patients treated with HD. A speculative hypothesis for why this is the case may be that HP + HD can achieve the complementary elimination of metabolites, effectively preventing and treating complications caused by long-term dialysis and prolonging life expectancy. Therefore, HP + HD should be widely used in ESRD patients. The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.
Authors: Yan Xie; Benjamin Bowe; Ali H Mokdad; Hong Xian; Yan Yan; Tingting Li; Geetha Maddukuri; Cheng-You Tsai; Tasheia Floyd; Ziyad Al-Aly Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2018-08-03 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Thaminda Liyanage; Toshiharu Ninomiya; Vivekanand Jha; Bruce Neal; Halle Marie Patrice; Ikechi Okpechi; Ming-hui Zhao; Jicheng Lv; Amit X Garg; John Knight; Anthony Rodgers; Martin Gallagher; Sradha Kotwal; Alan Cass; Vlado Perkovic Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Yan Hong Gu; Xiu Hong Yang; Li Hua Pan; Xiao Li Zhan; Li Li Guo; Hui Min Jin Journal: Int J Artif Organs Date: 2019-03-28 Impact factor: 1.595