He Zhou1,2, Catherine Park1, Mohammad Shahbazi1, Michele K York3, Mark E Kunik4,5,6,7, Aanand D Naik4,6,7, Bijan Najafi1,7. 1. Interdisciplinary Consortium on Advanced Motion Performance (iCAMP), Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. 2. BioSensics LLC, Newton, Massachusetts, USA. 3. Neurology and Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. 4. Houston VA HSR&D Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA. 5. Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. 6. VA South Central Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Houston, Texas, USA. 7. Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine Section, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cognitive frailty (CF), defined as the simultaneous presence of cognitive impairment and physical frailty, is a clinical symptom in early-stage dementia with promise in assessing the risk of dementia. The purpose of this study was to use wearables to determine the most sensitive digital gait biomarkers to identify CF. METHODS: Of 121 older adults (age = 78.9 ± 8.2 years, body mass index = 26.6 ± 5.5 kg/m2) who were evaluated with a comprehensive neurological exam and the Fried frailty criteria, 41 participants (34%) were identified with CF and 80 participants (66%) were identified without CF. Gait performance of participants was assessed under single task (walking without cognitive distraction) and dual task (walking while counting backward from a random number) using a validated wearable platform. Participants walked at habitual speed over a distance of 10 m. A validated algorithm was used to determine steady-state walking. Gait parameters of interest include steady-state gait speed, stride length, gait cycle time, double support, and gait unsteadiness. In addition, speed and stride length were normalized by height. RESULTS: Our results suggest that compared to the group without CF, the CF group had deteriorated gait performances in both single-task and dual-task walking (Cohen's effect size d = 0.42-0.97, p < 0.050). The largest effect size was observed in normalized dual-task gait speed (d = 0.97, p < 0.001). The use of dual-task gait speed improved the area under the curve (AUC) to distinguish CF cases to 0.76 from 0.73 observed for the single-task gait speed. Adding both single-task and dual-task gait speeds did not noticeably change AUC. However, when additional gait parameters such as gait unsteadiness, stride length, and double support were included in the model, AUC was improved to 0.87. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that gait performances measured by wearable sensors are potential digital biomarkers of CF among older adults. Dual-task gait and other detailed gait metrics provide value for identifying CF above gait speed alone. Future studies need to examine the potential benefits of gait performances for early diagnosis of CF and/or tracking its severity over time.
BACKGROUND: Cognitive frailty (CF), defined as the simultaneous presence of cognitive impairment and physical frailty, is a clinical symptom in early-stage dementia with promise in assessing the risk of dementia. The purpose of this study was to use wearables to determine the most sensitive digital gait biomarkers to identify CF. METHODS: Of 121 older adults (age = 78.9 ± 8.2 years, body mass index = 26.6 ± 5.5 kg/m2) who were evaluated with a comprehensive neurological exam and the Fried frailty criteria, 41 participants (34%) were identified with CF and 80 participants (66%) were identified without CF. Gait performance of participants was assessed under single task (walking without cognitive distraction) and dual task (walking while counting backward from a random number) using a validated wearable platform. Participants walked at habitual speed over a distance of 10 m. A validated algorithm was used to determine steady-state walking. Gait parameters of interest include steady-state gait speed, stride length, gait cycle time, double support, and gait unsteadiness. In addition, speed and stride length were normalized by height. RESULTS: Our results suggest that compared to the group without CF, the CF group had deteriorated gait performances in both single-task and dual-task walking (Cohen's effect size d = 0.42-0.97, p < 0.050). The largest effect size was observed in normalized dual-task gait speed (d = 0.97, p < 0.001). The use of dual-task gait speed improved the area under the curve (AUC) to distinguish CF cases to 0.76 from 0.73 observed for the single-task gait speed. Adding both single-task and dual-task gait speeds did not noticeably change AUC. However, when additional gait parameters such as gait unsteadiness, stride length, and double support were included in the model, AUC was improved to 0.87. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that gait performances measured by wearable sensors are potential digital biomarkers of CF among older adults. Dual-task gait and other detailed gait metrics provide value for identifying CF above gait speed alone. Future studies need to examine the potential benefits of gait performances for early diagnosis of CF and/or tracking its severity over time.
Authors: Joe Verghese; Emmeline Ayers; Nir Barzilai; David A Bennett; Aron S Buchman; Roee Holtzer; Mindy J Katz; Richard B Lipton; Cuiling Wang Journal: Neurology Date: 2014-10-31 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Olga Theou; Lynne Cann; Joanna Blodgett; Lindsay M K Wallace; Thomas D Brothers; Kenneth Rockwood Journal: Ageing Res Rev Date: 2015-04-04 Impact factor: 10.895
Authors: Manuel M Montero-Odasso; Yanina Sarquis-Adamson; Mark Speechley; Michael J Borrie; Vladimir C Hachinski; Jennie Wells; Patricia M Riccio; Marcelo Schapira; Ervin Sejdic; Richard M Camicioli; Robert Bartha; William E McIlroy; Susan Muir-Hunter Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: K Aminian; C Trevisan; B Najafi; H Dejnabadi; C Frigo; E Pavan; A Telonio; F Cerati; E C Marinoni; Ph Robert; P-F Leyvraz Journal: Gait Posture Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 2.840
Authors: Sid E O'Bryant; Joy D Humphreys; Glenn E Smith; Robert J Ivnik; Neill R Graff-Radford; Ronald C Petersen; John A Lucas Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2008-07
Authors: Kim Delbaere; Jacqueline C T Close; A Stefanie Mikolaizak; Perminder S Sachdev; Henry Brodaty; Stephen R Lord Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2010-01-08 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Catherine Park; Md Moin Uddin Atique; Ramkinker Mishra; Bijan Najafi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-30 Impact factor: 4.614