Ticks infesting dogs and cats in North America: Biology, geographic distribution, and pathogen transmission.

A diverse array of ixodid and argasid ticks infest dogs and cats in North America, resulting in skin lesions, blood loss, and disease. The ticks most commonly found on pets in this region are hard ticks of the genera Amblyomma, Dermacentor, Ixodes, and Rhipicephalus, as well as the more recently established Haemaphysalis longicornis. Soft tick genera, especially Otobius and Ornithodoros, are also reported from pets in some regions. In this review, we provide a summary of the complex and diverse life histories, distinct morphologies, and questing and feeding behaviors of the more common ticks of dogs and cats in North America with a focus on recent changes in geographic distribution. We also review pathogens of dogs and cats associated with the different tick species, some of which can cause serious, potentially fatal disease, and describe the zoonotic risk posed by ticks of pets. Understanding the natural history of ticks and the maintenance cycles responsible for providing an ongoing source of tick-borne infections is critical to effectively combatting the challenges ticks pose to the health of pets and people.

Introduction

Ticks are common hematophagous ectoparasites of both medical and veterinary importance that readily infest a variety of vertebrate hosts including dogs, cats, and humans. In contrast to many other arthropod vectors, where only specific instars imbibe blood, all motile tick stages feed on blood (Nicholson et al., 2019). In addition to direct effects from attachment and blood feeding, such as trauma to the skin and anemia, ticks vector a variety of pathogens, many of which are zoonotic (Childs and Paddock, 2003; Sonenshine and Roe, 2013; Eisen et al., 2017; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2018). Several tick-borne pathogens are readily transmitted to dogs and cats (Groves et al., 1975; Little et al., 2010; Nicholson et al., 2010; Little et al., 2018). Clinical disease due to these agents is well-characterized in dogs (Shaw et al., 2001a), and occurs, although is less well understood, in cats (Shaw et al., 2001b; Magnarelli et al., 2005, 2007).

In North America, vaccines are only available to limit disease due to Borrelia burgdorferi infection in dogs, thus routine use of effective tick control products and avoiding tick infestations are crucial to protecting pets. However, the complex biology and diverse array of ticks active in this region make control and prevention inherently difficult. Ticks are relatively long-lived and prolific parasites with varying life histories, both among species and within species in differing geographic locations (Yunik et al., 2015; Ogden et al., 2018). Further complicating control efforts, most tick species spend a majority of their life span in the environment and dogs and cats are continually re-exposed to questing ticks in nature.

Over the past several decades, tick populations have increased and their geographic ranges have expanded (Paddock et al., 2016; Sonenshine, 2018). These changes are the result of a variety of factors, many of which are anthropogenic, including climate change, habitat fragmentation, and host availability (Paddock and Yabsley, 2007; Diuk-Wasser et al., 2010; Paddock and Goddard, 2015). Tick ranges and populations are dynamic, as are the infestation and disease risk faced by dogs and cats. In addition to the increases in tick abundance and geographic range, the establishment of a novel tick species in North America (Beard et al., 2018) provides further evidence that the tick risk facing dogs and cats has shifted in the last few decades. The objectives of the current review are to (1) describe the species of ticks that commonly infest dogs and cats in North America and (2) review the biology and current geographic range of each species and the veterinary and zoonotic pathogens they transmit.

Ixodid (hard) ticks

Ticks infesting dogs and cats are from two families: Ixodidae (hard ticks) and Argasidae (soft ticks). Ixodid ticks are characterized by the presence of a distinct hard sclerotized plate on the dorsum called a scutum, with or without ornamentation, and a capitulum (mouthparts) that extends anterior to the idiosoma (body). The life cycle of ixodid ticks consists of four stages: egg, larva, nymph, and adult, of which the latter three are motile. In female, nymphal, and larval ticks, the scutum extends from the capitulum covering the anterior one-third to half of the dorsal body surface; in males the scutum covers the entire dorsal surface of the idiosoma (Fig. 1). The incomplete scutum of females, nymphs, and larvae allows the posterior portion of the body to greatly expand as the tick imbibes blood, whereas the complete scutum of males limits the degree of expansion achieved while feeding (Nicholson et al., 2019).

Fig. 1.

Dorsal and lateral view of non-fed and fed female and male Amblyomma americanum.

All common species of hard ticks found on dogs and cats in North America have a three-host life cycle, with each new motile stage feeding on a different host. Eggs laid by adult females hatch and give rise to six legged larvae, commonly referred to as seed ticks. For sylvatic species, large numbers of unfed larvae seek hosts in low lying vegetation often utilizing small rodents, lizards, or birds. Larvae will drop from the host after feeding to repletion and molt to eight-legged nymphs. The unfed nymphs then quest for a suitable host, feed, drop off of the host, and molt to eight-legged adults. The unfed adults then seek a third, final host. Although feeding behavior varies between species, both males and females of the common ixodid species in North America attach and imbibe blood. Adult females will feed and mate, becoming dramatically engorged before detaching from the host to lay eggs and die. Females in populations of some species are able to reproduce parthenogenetically. Female ixodid ticks have only a single gonotrophic cycle, meaning a single clutch containing thousands of eggs are laid at one time before she dies (Apanaskevich and Oliver, 2013).

The majority of an ixodid tick’s life cycle is spent off-host in the environment (Nicholson et al., 2019). The time to life cycle completion varies greatly depending on climate, particularly temperature and humidity. In laboratory studies some ixodid species exhibited generation times ranging from 3 to 4 months while others had longer generation times of up to 8 months (Loomis, 1961; Troughton and Levin, 2007). Generally speaking ticks in tropical regions develop more quickly and may complete multiple generations within a single year. However, in areas with both dry and rainy seasons, completion takes longer as ticks stop host seeking when humidity is low (Nicholson et al., 2019). Ticks inhabiting areas with colder temperatures also develop more slowly, and can undergo diapause when it is coldest, extending the time to life cycle completion to two years or more (Nicholson et al., 2019).

Host-seeking strategies vary among tick species but can largely be categorized as either nidicolous (nest or burrow dwelling) or non-nidicolous (Waladde and Rice, 1982; Carroll et al., 2002). Within the non-nidicolous ticks there are two major “questing” strategies for locating hosts: ambush and hunting (Nicholson et al., 2019). Ambush ticks climb vegetation and passively wait for hosts with their first pair of legs extended to grasp the fur, feathers, or clothing of passing hosts (Nicholson et al., 2019). This first pair of legs contains the Haller’s organ, structures with setae that sense humidity, temperature, and carbon dioxide to assist with locating a host (Sonenshine and Roe, 2013; Carr et al., 2017). In contrast, ticks that exhibit hunting behavior actively pursue their host and are located on or very close to the ground, also utilizing the Haller’s organ for chemoreception, particularly of carbon dioxide (Sonenshine, 2018; Nicholson et al., 2019). Ticks that ambush hosts include Ixodes scapularis and Dermacentor variabilis (Carroll et al., 2002), while ticks such as Amblyomma americanum are considered hunters (Carroll et al., 2002; Sonenshine, 2018). Once a potential host has been acquired, the ixodid tick determines if the host is appropriate to attach and feed. If the correct host-recognition cues (e.g. odor, heat, and carbon dioxide) are not found, the tick may drop off and resume host seeking (Nicholson et al., 2019). Even after the suitability of the host has been recognized, ixodid ticks may spend several minutes to hours locating a feeding site (Nicholson et al., 2019). Preferred feeding sites for host attachment have been demonstrated for numerous tick species and stages on several different hosts including dogs, cats, cattle, birds, and humans (Koch, 1982; Barnard et al., 1989; Felz et al., 1996; Heylen et al., 2014; Duscher et al., 2013; Beck et al., 2014; Little et al., 2018; Saleh et al., 2019).

After reaching the feeding site the tick uses chelicerae to lacerate the epidermis and insert the chelicerae and hypostome into the dermis (Moorhouse, 1969; Kemp et al., 1982), initiating the attachment process. The first one to two days an adult female tick is attached, the tick prepares the feeding lesion by secreting cement from the salivary glands (Moorhouse, 1969; Sonenshine and Anderson, 2013). The amount of cement produced varies among tick species. Genera with shorter mouthparts (Dermacentor, Haemaphysalis, and Rhipicephalus) that only penetrate as far as the dermal-epidermal junction secrete more cement, and tick genera with longer mouthparts (Amblyomma and Ixodes) extending into the dermis produce less cement (Moorhouse, 1969). The cement secretion hardens around the chelicerae and helps secure the feeding position, ensuring the tick is firmly affixed (Sonenshine and Anderson, 2013). Once secure, the tick alternates salivating and imbibing, injecting anticoagulants and immunomodulatory compounds as it salivates, thus enlarging the wound (Ribeiro, 1989; Steen et al., 2006; Wikel, 2013; Nicholson et al., 2019) and enabling the tick to feed slowly from the pooling blood for several days (Suppan et al., 2018). As feeding progresses the tick must produce fresh cuticle to allow for the expansion of the body as it engorges (Lees, 1952; Flynn and Kaufman, 2011). Duration of attachment and time to engorgement range from as little as 2–3 days for larval ticks and from 2 weeks or longer for adult females (United States Department of Agriculture, 1976; Apanaskevich and Oliver, 2013). To allow for prolonged attachment to the host, ticks mute the host immune response by the secretion of numerous pharmacologically active compounds in the tick saliva, including anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive proteins (Ribeiro, 1989; Steen et al., 2006; Wikel, 2013).

Argasid (soft) ticks

Unlike Ixodidae, Argasidae lack a scutum and as such are commonly referred to as soft ticks. Most species have a rounded body margin, and as adults the capitulum and mouthparts are not visible protruding from the body when the tick is viewed dorsally (Nicholson et al., 2019). In contrast to the life cycles exhibited by ixodid ticks, argasids are more variable with the majority feeding multiple times on multiple hosts. Argasid ticks also develop through the same basic life stages (egg, larva, nymph, and adult) but have several nymphal instars rather than the single nymphal instar of ixodid ticks. The number of argasid nymphal instars varies among species and is influenced by temperature, engorgement status, and number of previous instars (Apanaskevich and Oliver, 2013). Some species of argasid ticks do not take blood meals as larvae or as stage I nymphs, instead directly molting to the next stage using nutrients stored from their previous stage while others do not feed as adults (Apanaskevich and Oliver, 2013).

Most argasids are long-lived nidicolous ticks, living in caves, burrows, or nests of their hosts and often undergoing several month-long intervals between feedings when nests are vacant (Nicholson et al., 2019). Like ixodid ticks, argasid ticks possess and utilize the specialized sensory Haller’s organ to locate their host (Gray et al., 2013). Argasid ticks are relatively rapid feeders, with some active stages feeding in as little as fifteen to thirty minutes (Apanaskevich and Oliver, 2013). With a few exceptions, the majority of soft ticks do not secrete cement. No new cuticle is secreted during feeding, and soft tick engorgement is limited by how far the existing cuticle can stretch (Suppan et al., 2018; Nicholson et al., 2019). Females are able to complete multiple gonotrophic cycles, and usually lay several small batches of a few hundred eggs each after taking a small blood meal, repeating the process sometimes months later. Other species are autogenous and lay eggs without taking a blood meal in the adult stage (Nicholson et al., 2019).

Ticks infesting dogs and cats in North America

Ixodid ticks of the most importance to dogs and cats in North America include: Amblyomma americanum (lone star tick), Amblyomma maculatum (Gulf Coast tick), Dermacentor variabilis (American dog tick), Haemaphysalis longicornis (longhorned or bush tick), Ixodes pacificus (western black-legged tick), Ixodes scapularis (eastern black-legged or deer tick), and Rhipicephalus spp. (brown dog ticks) (Koch, 1982; Dryden and Payne, 2004; Burroughs et al., 2016; Thomas et al., 2016; Shannon et al., 2017; Little et al., 2018; Saleh et al., 2019). Other less common ixodid tick species may also occasionally be found on dogs and cats in this region (Bishopp and Trembley, 1945; Koch, 1982; Wells et al., 2004; Little et al., 2018; Saleh et al., 2019; Ghosh et al., 2021; Duncan et al., 2020, 2021). Additionally, two genera of argasid ticks, Otobius spp. and Ornithodoros spp., infest dogs and cats in North America (Cooley and Kohls, 1944a, 1944b; Bishopp and Trembley, 1945; Breitschwerdt et al., 1994; Kelly et al., 2014; Esteve-Gasent et al., 2017; Saleh et al., 2019).

Amblyomma americanum (lone star tick)

Environment

Amblyomma americanum, the lone star tick, is a three-host ixodid tick commonly found in the eastern United States. Historically this tick was primarily restricted to the southeastern and southcentral United States (Bishopp and Trembley, 1945). More recently, the range of A. americanum has expanded considerably (Brown et al., 2011; Cortinas and Spomer, 2013; Barrett et al., 2015; Dahlgren et al., 2016) and can now be found in parts of most northeastern and Midwestern states (Springer et al., 2014; Monzon et al., 2016). Additionally, A. americanum is found with increasing frequency in southern Ontario (Nelder et al., 2019). Application of bioclimatic modelling and climate change forecasts to predict future geographical distributions of A. americanum suggest continued expansion in the upper Midwest, contraction in areas of coastal Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and eastern Texas, and no westward expansion beyond the current limit of the 100th meridian (Springer et al., 2015). Others examining the current and future potential distribution of A. americanum with ecological niche modelling support continued expansion of the lone star tick northward (Raghavan et al., 2019). Additionally, broad areas in northern California as well as the west coast of Oregon, Washington, and British Colombia are thought to be climactically suitable for A. americanum although there is no evidence to suggest populations of lone star ticks have established in these areas (Raghavan et al., 2019).

Amblyomma americanum can be found in a variety of habitats ranging from open grasslands and prairies to mature, climax forest. The greatest number of lone star ticks are found in wooded habitats with dense underbrush or trees < 6 m in height and low-lying branches (Hair and Howell, 1970; Semtner et al., 1971; Sonenshine et al., 1966). Within its preferred habitat, lone star ticks are not uniformly distributed and are found most along ecotones (Semtner et al., 1971), within forest openings, and areas with abundant animal hosts (Hair and Howell, 1970). Amblyomma americanum overwinters as adults and nymphs. Activity of both stages of lone star ticks in the spring are thought largely to be stimulated by mean and maximum daily temperature, however, temperature and humidity within the tick’s micro-habitat are key for their development and survival (Hair and Howell, 1970). Data collected in New Jersey noted that A. americanum adults did not quest at temperatures below 4.4 °C (Schulze et al., 2001).

Across the core range of A. americanum in the United States, each feeding stage of the tick fluctuates seasonally in levels of activity (Sonenshine et al., 1966; Hair and Howell, 1970; Jackson et al., 1996; Lavender and Oliver, 1996; Kollars et al., 2000; Goddard, 2007). Adults and nymphal A. americanum emerge in early spring and peak in activity in May. Adult A. americanum will remain active through June and July but their activity begins to subside by August. Despite the clear seasonality of A. americanum, adult lone star ticks can be found on preferred hosts, white- tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) anytime of the year suggesting they become active during warm weather breaks in colder months (Hair and Howell, 1970). Nymphal activity also subsides through summer but increases for a second time in September and into October. Activity of A. americanum larvae increases in June and continues through August and September, but declines rapidly thereafter.

Amblyomma americanum is euryxenous and will feed on a wide range of vertebrate animals. When active, lone star ticks aggressively seek hosts and are relatively non-specific when selecting a host. Nevertheless, larvae, nymphs, and adults of A. americanum most commonly infest medium- and large-sized wild and domestic mammals (Bishopp and Trembley, 1945; Hair and Howell, 1970; Childs and Paddock, 2003). White-tailed deer are principal hosts to all feeding stages of A. americanum (Koch, 1988) and are critical to maintain populations of lone star ticks in natural environments. Ground-inhabiting birds, such as wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) and bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus) are also readily infested with A. americanum larvae and nymphs (Bishopp and Trembley, 1945; Hair and Howell, 1970). Small mammals are rarely to occasionally infested with A. americanum larvae and nymphs (Bishopp and Trembley, 1945; Hair and Howell, 1970; Zimmerman et al., 1987; Kollars et al., 2000).

Morphology

Amblyomma americanum are medium-sized ticks with females being a little larger than males (Fig. 2). Lone star ticks are reddish brown, ornate, have long mouth parts, eyes, a rectangular basis capitulum, and festoons. Female A. americanum are easily identified by the conspicuous iridescent white dot on the posterior margin of the scutum. Its designation as the lone star tick is attributed to the resemblance of the conspicuous dot to the prominent single white star on the Texas state flag, known as the “Lone Star” flag. Male A. americanum are readily identified by having white markings on the margin of the scutum and flecked on the festoons. Nymphs and larvae of A. americanum, like most other immature ixodids, are more difficult to distinguish from other species of ticks. Nymphal A. americanum are light brown to reddish brown in color and have long mouth parts. Nymphs resemble adult A. americanum but are inornate and approximately half the size. Larval A. americanum are commonly called “seed ticks” because they are about the size of a poppy seed. Larval A. americanum are pale in color and difficult to see on an animal due to their small size. Seed ticks often occur in the 100s or 1000s on hosts as they migrate very little from where a clutch of eggs was deposited by a female. Keys are available to aid the identification of adult and immature A. americanum (Keirans and Litwak, 1989; Keirans and Durden, 1998; Coley, 2015).

Fig. 2.

Amblyomma americanum, lone star tick, dorsal and ventral view of each stage and description of key morphologic features. From top to bottom: Female, male, nymph, larva. Descriptions adapted from:

1Keirans, J.E., and T.R. Litwak. 1989. Pictorial key to the adults of hard ticks, family Ixodidae (Ixodida: Ixodoidea), East of the Mississippi River. Journal of Medical Entomology 26: 435–448.

2Cooley, R.A., G.M. Kohls. 1944. The genus Amblyomma (Ixodidae) in the United States. Journal of Parasitology. 30: 77–111.

3Keirans, J.E., and L.A. Durden. 1998. Illustrated key to the nymphs of the tick genus Amblyomma (Acari: Ixodidae) found in the United States. Journal of Medical Entomology 35: 489–495.

4Coley, K. 2015. Identification Guide to Larval Stages of Ticks of Medical Importance in the USA. University Honors Program Thesis, paper 110. Georgia Southern University.

Feeding and disease transmission

Dogs and cats are both readily infested by larval, nymphal, and adult A. americanum. In a national survey of ticks on dogs and cats recovered by veterinarians in the United States (Saleh et al., 2019), A. americanum was present on 23.1% of dogs (345 of 1494) with lone star ticks collected every month except February and November. In the same survey, A. americanum was collected from 29.5% of cats (99 of 336) with lone star ticks collected every month except January, February, and December. Proportions of dogs and cats infested with lone star ticks will vary depending on geographic region with infestations more common in the southcentral and southeastern United States. Examination of A. americanum infested dogs from southeastern Oklahoma and northwestern Arkansas, noted the fewest number of adult lone star ticks on the dorsum with an even distribution over the rest of the body (Koch, 1982). Nymphs were most abundant on the chest and front legs whereas larvae were mostly attached to dogs’ ears. Saleh et al. (2019) noted adult A. americanum preferred to attach to the abdomen, axillary, and inguinal regions of dogs. On cats, however, significantly more adult A. americanum were attached to the tail and perianal region (Saleh et al., 2019).

The bite of lone star ticks is painful and irritating due to their long mouthparts. Despite relatively high tick burdens, levels of A. americanum infestation are rarely severe enough on domestic animals to result in debilitating clinical disease from the tick bite alone. However, in white-tailed deer fawns, severe infestations of A. americanum may result in death due to anemia, tissue destruction, and secondary bacterial infection (Bolte et al., 1970; Hair et al., 1992). Lone star ticks are aggressive and annoying. Grossly, the bite of a lone star tick appears superficial and relatively innocuous in contrast to histopathological changes that take place in a tick bite lesion. Compared to pre-infestation levels, the number of immune cells in the bite lesion of an A. americanum female increased over the duration of attachment (Thomas et al., 2020). Significantly more neutrophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, and macrophages were noted 8 days post-infestation in dogs whereas significantly more eosinophils, lymphocytes, and macrophages were noted in cats. Pruritus due to infestation with A. americanum on dogs and cats may result in trauma and secondary bacterial infection; intradermal infestations with A. americanum described in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) have not yet been reported in pets in the region (Smith et al., 1986).

Amblyomma americanum are primary vectors for a variety of pathogens to dogs and cats. These pathogens include: Cytauxzoon felis, Ehrlichia chaffeensis, Ehrlichia ewingii, and Francisella tularensis (Table 1). Although experimental and limited field evidence suggests A. americanum may be a secondary vector of Rickettsia rickettsii (Breitschwerdt et al., 2011; Levin et al., 2017), more research is needed to explore the relative importance of this tick in transmitting the true Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) agent. Amblyomma americanum is a vector for other spotted fever group Rickettsia spp. including Rickettsia amblyommatis (Barrett et al., 2014).

Table 1

Tick species, commonly reported hosts, known canine and feline pathogens, and current distribution of ticks commonly found parasitizing dogs and cats in North America.

Species	Primary hosts (stages)	Disease agents of dogs and cats	Current distribution in North America
Amblyomma americanum	White-tailed deer (L, N, A), large and medium-sized mammals (L, N, A), birds (L, N)	Cytauxzoon felis Ehrlichia ewingii Ehrlichia chaffeensis Francisella tularensis	Eastern half of North America from Gulf of Mexico to northern United States
Amblyomma maculatum	Cattle and other large mammals (A), birds and small mammals (L, N)	Hepatozoon americanum	Found 402 km inland in states along the Gulf Coast and in states bordering the Atlantic Coast as far northeast as Delaware; also found in several land-locked Midwestern and southern states
Dermacentor variabilis	Dogs, coyotes, cattle, horses, and raccoons (A), small mammals (L, N)	Rickettsia rickettsii Cytauxzoon felis	Eastern half of North America from Gulf of Mexico to southern Canada; isolated populations along the Pacific Coast in the United States, and extending eastward into Idaho
Haemaphysalis longicornis	White-tailed deer, cattle, raccoons, opossums (L, N, A)	Not known to be a primary vector of any canine or feline disease agents in North America at this time	Reported in 15 eastern states and in Arkansas, but documented distribution continues to spread
Ixodes pacificus	Black-tailed deer (A), lizards, small rodents (L, N)	Anaplasma phagocytophilum Borrelia burgdorferi	California, western Oregon, western Washington and northward to British Columbia; also, in Utah and Nevada
Ixodes scapularis	White-tailed deer (A), small mammals (L, N in northern North America), lizards (L, N in the southern United States)	Anaplasma phagocytophilum Borrelia burgdorferi Ehrlichia muris	Eastern half of United States from Florida to central Texas and northward to eastern North Dakota and Maine; also common in southern Atlantic, Central, and some Western provinces in Canada
Rhipicephalus spp.	Dogs (L, N, A)	Anaplasma platys * Babesia vogeli Babesia gibsoni * Cercopithifilaria sp. * Ehrlichia canis Hepatozoon canis * Rickettsia rickettsii	Considered ubiquitous wherever there are dogs, with populations more intense in the southern United States, Hawaii, Mexico, and in the Caribbean
Otobius megnini	Cattle, goats, horses, sheep, wild ungulates (L, N)	Not a primary vector of any known disease agent	Southwestern and southcentral states, in states bordering the Pacific Coast into British Columbia, and in some southeastern states

Abbreviations: L larva; N nymph; A adult.

Transmission by ticks has not been confirmed in North America.

Pathogens

Amblyomma americanum has been demonstrated as a vector of C. felis to domestic cats (Reichard et al., 2009, 2010). In addition to adult A. americanum transmitting C. felis, nymphal lone star ticks have been shown to transmit the piroplasm to domestic cats (Allen et al., 2019). Dermacentor variabilis has also been demonstrated as a competent vector for C. felis to domestic cats (Blouin et al., 1984) and bobcats (Blouin et al., 1987). Cytauxzoonosis in domestic cats occurs throughout the southcentral and southeastern United States (Sherrill and Cohn, 2015), in an area that overlaps the distribution of both A. americanum and D. variabilis. In a study conducted in Oklahoma by Reichard et al. (2008), the highest number of cytauxzoonosis cases occurred in May and September when activities of A. americanum adults and nymphs were expected to be highest. Cytauxzoon felis has been documented in bobcats from two states, North Dakota (Shock et al., 2011) and Pennsylvania (Birkenheuer et al., 2008), in which no known cases of cytauxzoonosis have been reported from domestic cats. The prevalence of C. felis in bobcats is higher in states with established populations of A. americanum (Shock et al., 2011). Cytauxzoon felis DNA was present in A. americanum nymphs collected from 3 cats with cytauxzoonosis in Missouri (Bondy et al., 2005). In wild-collected, unfed A. americanum and D. variabilis from Oklahoma, the minimum infection of C. felis was 0.5% in male (1 of 153), 0.8% in nymphal (3 of 393), and 1.9% in female (3 of 161) lone star ticks, and 0.0% in female (n = 74) and 0.0% in male (n = 86) American dog ticks (Reichard et al., 2010). Shock et al., 2014 examined A. americanum and D. variabilis from Kentucky, Tennessee, Georgia, and Texas and found C. felis DNA only in American dog ticks from Tennessee (1.8%; 8 of 442) and Georgia (0.8%; 1 of 125).

Amblyomma americanum is a primary vector for E. chaffeensis (Ewing et al., 1995; Varela-Stokes, 2007) and E. ewingii (Anziania et al., 1990). Examination of 8662 dogs from the southcentral and southeastern United States, where A. americanum populations are most abundant, showed a higher percentage of dogs are exposed to E. ewingii (5.1%) than E. chaffeensis (2.8%) (Beall et al., 2012). Despite dogs being naturally exposed to and infected by E. chaffeensis, attempts to infect dogs experimentally by transmission feeding infected A. americanum have failed (Ewing et al., 1995). Transovarial transmission of E. chaffeensis in A. americanum does not appear to take place (Long et al., 2003). Numerous publications exist reporting the presence of E. chaffeensis and E. ewingii DNA in A. americanum throughout the geographic range of the tick, and prevalence generally ranges from <1.0% to approximately 10% (Anderson et al., 1993; Lockhart et al., 1997; Yu et al., 1997; Burket et al., 1998; Murphy et al., 1998; Roland et al., 1998; Steiner et al., 1999; Ijdo et al., 2000; Irving et al., 2000; Whitlock et al., 2000; Wolf et al., 2000; Stromdahl et al., 2001; Steiert and Gilfoy, 2002; Goddard et al., 2003; DeShields et al., 2004; Long et al., 2004; Mixson et al., 2004; Varela et al., 2004a; Schulze et al., 2005; Mixson et al., 2006; Castellaw et al., 2010; Cohen et al., 2010; Yabsley, 2010; Schulze et al., 2011; Fritzen et al., 2011; Fitak et al., 2014; Gaines et al., 2014; Maegli et al., 2016; Sayler et al., 2016; Simpson et al., 2019) depending on experimental design, detection methodology, and sample size.

Francisella tularensis (subspecies tularensis, or type A), causative agent of tularemia, can be vectored by several arthropods including ticks. Transmission of F. tularensis through ticks is considered biological whereas transmission through other arthropods is mechanical. It is believed that D. variabilis is the primary vector of F. tularensis and maintains infections among wild animals, whereas A. americanum acts as a bridge vector for human infection (Eisen, 2007; Mani et al., 2015). Information on infection of F. tularensis in A. americanum is limited to several reports of either natural infections from lone star ticks collected off hosts in Arkansas (Calhoun, 1954), experimental infection and demonstration of transstadial transmission (Hopla, 1953; Hopla and Downs, 1953), and quantification, colonization, and duration of infection (Mani et al., 2015).

Zoonotic concerns

Amblyomma americanum has emerged as a serious parasite and vector of pathogens to humans in the United States (Childs and Paddock, 2003; Paddock and Yabsley, 2007). Larvae, nymphs, and adults of A. americanum all can infest and feed on humans. Amblyomma americanum is the most commonly recovered tick from humans in the southeastern United States (Merten and Durden, 2000). In surveys, 83% of ticks recovered from humans in Georgia and South Carolina were A. americanum (Felz et al., 1996); 63% of ticks collected off humans in Mississippi were A. americanum (Goddard, 2002). Along with D. variabilis (34.0%), A. americanum (34.3%) was the most commonly recovered tick species from United States Air Force personnel (Campbell and Bowles, 1994). Amblyomma americanum is either a known or suspected vector for several established or potential pathogens of humans including: Ehrlichia chaffeensis (Childs and Paddock, 2003; Paddock and Yabsley, 2007), E. ewingii (Childs and Paddock, 2003; Paddock and Yabsley, 2007), Panola Mountain Ehrlichia (PME) (Loftis et al., 2008; Reeves et al., 2008), Rickettsia amblyommatis (Billeter et al., 2007a, b; Jiang et al., 2010; Karpathy et al., 2016), Bourbon virus (Lambert et al., 2015; Savage et al., 2017; Jackson et al., 2019), Heartland virus (Brault et al., 2018), and Borrelia lonestari (James et al., 2001; Varela et al., 2004b). The bite of A. americanum has been associated with development of red meat allergy in humans. This delayed anaphylaxis is believed to be initiated by feeding of A. americanum and the production of antibodies against galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose (alpha-gal), a carbohydrate produced in all mammals besides humans, great apes, and new world monkeys (Commins et al., 2011; Steinke et al., 2015).

Amblyomma maculatum (Gulf Coast tick)

Amblyomma maculatum is an aggressive, three-host species commonly known as the Gulf Coast tick (Paddock and Goddard, 2015; Nadolny and Gaff, 2018). Historically found only as far as 161–257 km (100–160 miles) inland in states bordering the Gulf Coast and southern Atlantic Coast, this tick is now established 402 km (250 miles) inland in coastal states and is endemic in states along the Atlantic Coast into Delaware and in several land-locked Midwestern and southern states (Paddock and Goddard, 2015; Portugal and Goddard, 2016; Lockwood et al., 2018; Nadolny and Gaff, 2018; Maestas et al., 2020; Phillips et al., 2020). Immature Gulf Coast ticks feed on a variety of birds and rodents, while adult A. maculatum infest larger mammals including cattle, coyotes (Canis latrans), feral swine (Sus scrofa), horses, sheep, and white-tailed deer. However, Gulf Coast ticks occasionally feed on domestic dogs and cats (Dryden and Payne, 2004; Paddock and Goddard, 2015; Little et al., 2018; Nadolny and Gaff, 2018; Saleh et al., 2019).

Gulf Coast ticks are able to tolerate exposed, arid and hot environments. Common habitats include mesquite areas, oak savannah, prairie, and scrublands, especially when adjacent to wetland areas (Paddock and Goddard, 2015; Nadolny and Gaff, 2018; Maestas et al., 2020). The catholic feeding behavior of A. maculatum, their ability to thrive in both dry and humid environments, expansion of white-tailed deer and feral swine populations, frequent movement of livestock, and migration patterns of avian hosts have all likely contributed to the broadening geographic distribution of this tick species over the past 50–70 years. The establishment and spread of coastal A. maculatum populations are also facilitated by anthropogenic disturbances, and inland populations may contract or bloom according to precipitation patterns (Paddock and Goddard, 2015; Nadolny and Gaff, 2018).

Host-seeking adult Gulf Coast ticks are found on vegetation in open, exposed areas, and are able to tolerate harsh summertime conditions in which other common sympatric tick species would languish. Seasonal peak activity of immature A. maculatum has not fully been elucidated, and field survey data investigating questing behaviors vary depending on region (Goddard, 2007; Paddock and Goddard, 2015; Portugal and Goddard, 2016; Nadolny and Gaff, 2018). Experimentally, nymphal Gulf Coast ticks quest low on vegetation and migrate horizontally at a slow speed. This questing behavior may be the reason why immature A. maculatum are commonly found on ground-dwelling birds and other small animals. Adults of A. maculatum are active during March through September, but as with immatures, data differ somewhat with the geographic region surveyed and months of activity (Portugal and Goddard, 2016; Nadolny and Gaff, 2018).

Amblyomma maculatum is a member of the Amblyomma maculatum group, which also includes A. neumanni, A. parvitarsum, A. tigrinum, and A. triste. Within this group, A. maculatum, A. tigrinum, and A. triste are exceptionally difficult to distinguish by morphology during all instars, and therefore misidentifications have likely occurred since their original descriptions (Estrada-Peña et al., 2005; Mertins et al., 2010; Lado et al., 2018). Phylogenetic comparisons have led some researchers to hypothesize that A. maculatum and A. triste are indeed the same species. However, further studies are needed to support or refute this hypothesis (Lado et al., 2018), and therefore A. maculatum is regarded as distinct from A. triste in the current review.

Keys are available to aid in species identification of immature and adult Amblyomma spp. in the United States (Cooley and Kohls, 1944a, 1944b; Keirans and Durden, 1998). Like other Amblyomma species, A. maculatum have characteristically elongate mouthparts (Fig. 3) (Cooley and Kohls, 1944a, 1944b). Because morphologies are quite similar among immature Amblyomma spp., consultation with a diagnostic lab having specific entomologic expertise may be advisable. Subtle morphologic differences between immature Amblyomma spp. as observed under magnification include characteristic margins of the basis capitulum with presence/absence of lateral projections, presence/absence of projections on the ventral basis capitulum, shape and dentition of hypostomes, and presence/absence of spurs on Coxae I–III (Cooley and Kohls, 1944a, [Cooley and Kohls, 1944b] 1944b; Keirans and Durden, 1998).

Fig. 3.

Amblyomma maculatum, Gulf Coast tick, dorsal and ventral view of each stage and description of key morphologic features. From top to bottom: Female, male, nymph, larva. Descriptions adapted from:

1Keirans, J.E., and T.R. Litwak. 1989. Pictorial key to the adults of hard ticks, family Ixodidae (Ixodida: Ixodoidea), East of the Mississippi River. Journal of Medical Entomology 26: 435–448.

2Cooley, R.A., G.M. Kohls. 1944. The genus Amblyomma (Ixodidae) in the United States. Journal of Parasitology. 30: 77–111.

3Keirans, J.E., and L.A. Durden. 1998. Illustrated key to the nymphs of the tick genus Amblyomma (Acari: Ixodidae) found in the United States. Journal of Medical Entomology 26: 489–495.

4Coley, K. 2015. Identification Guide to Larval Stages of Ticks of Medical Importance in the USA. University Honors Program Thesis, paper 110. Georgia Southern University.

Amblyomma spp. adults are more easily differentiated. Among other characteristics, female A. maculatum have an ornate scutum with pale markings in an extensive pattern and a very short spur on the first pair of coxae. Male A. maculatum have an ornate scutum with a filigree pattern in white and brown, and one spur on the second, third, and fourth pair of coxae (Cooley and Kohls, 1944a, [Cooley and Kohls, 1944b] 1944b; Lado et al., 2018). Amblyomma maculatum and D. variabilis males and females are sometimes confused based on their large sizes and ornate patterns (Paddock and Goddard, 2015), but careful examination of mouthpart length and basis capitulum shape can lead to successful species identification (Cooley and Kohls, 1944a, 1944b).

Little is known about the direct effects of feeding A. maculatum on cats and dogs, and attachment site preferences have not been reported. On wildlife hosts, immature A. maculatum most often attach near or on the head region. On cattle, immature A. maculatum most often attach to dorsal body areas (withers, midline, and tail-head) (Ketchum et al., 2005). Adult A. maculatum preferentially feed on inner and outer surfaces of the external ear of livestock (especially cattle), and over time may cause the inflammatory, destructive condition dubbed “gotch ear” (Edwards, 2011; Paddock and Goddard, 2015). Other direct effects of feeding Gulf Coast ticks on cattle are well-documented and include abscesses, anemia, edema, and predisposition to myiasis and secondary infection (Nadolny and Gaff, 2018). Similar consequences from A. maculatum infestations in dogs and cats may occur but reports are lacking and warrant further consideration.

Amblyomma maculatum is primarily of concern to canine medicine because it is the vector of Hepatozoon americanum, the apicomplexan parasite causing American canine hepatozoonosis (ACH; Table 1). Immature A. maculatum acquire H. americanum via feeding on infected canids; the parasite subsequently develops within ticks during ecdysis, resulting in numerous sporulated oocysts in emerged instars. Dogs become infected with H. americanum via ingestion of Gulf Coast ticks harboring the oocysts. Ingestion of ticks may occur through grooming of self or other dogs, or possibly by the incidental ingestion of infected ticks parasitizing prey species (Vincent-Johnson et al., 1997; Mathew et al., 1998; Johnson et al., 2009; Allen et al., 2011). Rarely, the feeding of Gulf Coast ticks has been associated with paralysis in dogs (Gothe et al., 1979; Espinoza-Gomez et al., 2011; Paddock and Goddard, 2015).

Experimentally, oocysts of H. americanum are found free in the body cavity of A. maculatum, and may be abundant. Each oocyst contains numerous sporocysts that are comprised of hundreds of infective sporozoites (Mathew et al., 1998). In enzootic areas, prevalence of H. americanum infection in Gulf Coast tick populations is not known but seems low (KE Allen, unpublished data). Coyotes may serve as reservoirs of H. americanum to feeding A. maculatum in Oklahoma and Texas (Kocan et al., 2000; Garrett et al., 2005; Starkey et al., 2013). Dogs with ACH are typically diagnosed in regions where Gulf Coast ticks are established, but infections have been documented in other states due to displacement or travel history (Allen et al., 2008; Li et al., 2008).

DNA of Anaplasma platys, E. chaffeensis, and E. ewingii has been documented within field- collected A. maculatum. These zoonotic canine pathogens transmit via tick feeding and are thought to primarily use other tick vectors in nature (Williamson et al., 2010; Maegli et al., 2016; Breitschwerdt et al., 2014; Mays et al., 2016; Allerdice et al., 2017; Maestas et al., 2020). Gulf Coast ticks have also been experimentally shown to vector Panola Mountain Ehrlichia (PME), which naturally cycles between A. americanum and likely white-tailed deer reservoirs in the United States (Paddock and Goddard, 2015; Loftis et al., 2016); DNA of PME was detected in 0.5–4.3% of A. maculatum tested from several Gulf Coast states (Loftis et al., 2016). However, the potential role of A. maculatum as a natural alternative vector for any of these bacterial organisms is not clear (Williamson et al., 2010; Jiang et al., 2012; Loftis et al., 2016; Allerdice et al., 2017; Maestas et al., 2020).

Amblyomma maculatum is chiefly recognized as a risk to human health because it is the vector of Rickettsia parkeri, an emerging spotted fever rickettsia. Cases have been documented in mid-Atlantic, southeastern, and southern states, and in some regions of Arizona (Hardstone Yoshimizu and Billeter, 2018). DNA of R. parkeri has been detected in the blood of domestic dogs by PCR; dogs are not known to develop apparent clinical signs with infection, and may serve as potential reservoirs to feeding ticks (Grasperge et al., 2012; Hardstone Yoshimizu and Billeter, 2018). Field- collected Gulf Coast ticks have also been shown to harbor DNA of Rickettsia felis, an emerging flea-borne infection in humans that is found world-wide. Although the pathogen has been molecularly detected in dogs in Africa, to date it has not been documented in dogs in North America (Moonga et al., 2019).

Gulf Coast ticks may also transmit more poorly understood spotted fever rickettsia to humans including R. amblyommatis (formerly Rickettsia amblyommii and Candidatus Rickettsia amblyommii) and Rickettsia montanensis (Nadolny et al., 2014; Karpathy et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2017; Harris et al., 2017; Hardstone Yoshimizu and Billeter, 2018; Maestas et al., 2020). Molecular evidence suggests that both of these organisms can infect dogs (Barrett et al., 2014; Hardstone Yoshimizu and Billeter, 2018), and therefore possibly Gulf Coast ticks feeding on dogs. Also, as in canine medicine, the role of A. maculatum as a vector of Ehrlichia spp. to humans is not clear (Williamson et al., 2010; Jiang et al., 2012; Breitschwerdt et al., 2014; Paddock and Goddard, 2015; Loftis et al., 2016; Mays et al., 2016; Allerdice et al., 2017; Maestas et al., 2020). Feeding Gulf Coast ticks have also been associated with tick paralysis (Gothe et al., 1979; Espinoza-Gomez et al., 2011; Paddock and Goddard, 2015).

Dermacentor variabilis (American dog tick)

A variety of Dermacentor spp. occur in North America and infest dogs and cats, including D. albipictus, D. andersoni, D. occidentalis, and D. variabilis. However, D. variabilis, the American dog tick, is the most common species recovered from dogs and cats throughout the United States (Little et al., 2018; Saleh et al., 2019). Dermacentor albipictus, the winter tick, is found across the United States and Canada and commonly infests large ungulates but has been reported from a few dogs and cats in the Midwestern and western United States and from Alberta and British Columbia in Canada (Lindquist et al., 2016; Saleh et al., 2019; Duncan et al., 2020). Dermacentor andersoni is found in Rocky Mountain states and western Canada. The Pacific Coast tick, D. occidentalis, is found from central Oregon to California in the United States; this tick commonly infests humans and has occasionally been reported from dogs (Hooker et al., 1912; Merten and Durden, 2000; Vigil, 2013). In Mexico D. occidentalis is found in Baja California and Baja California Sur (Guzmán-Cornejo et al., 2016). The most common Dermacentor sp. infesting dogs and cats in North America is D. variabilis and will be the focus of the current review.

Dermacentor variabilis is one of the most widespread ixodid ticks in North America. Its distribution ranges from Florida to southern Canada in the eastern half of the United States, and extends to the Gulf of Mexico, with isolated populations also occurring along the Pacific Coast in California, Oregon, and Washington, and extending eastward into Idaho (Bishopp and Trembley, 1945; Wilkinson, 1967; Stout et al., 1971; Rotramel et al., 1976; Easton et al., 1977). In Canada, D. variabilis is present in 8 of 10 provinces and 2 of 3 territories, with the greatest abundance in parts of Nova Scotia as well as southern Manitoba and Ontario. The species has also been documented in Alaska (Dergousoff et al., 2013; Durden et al., 2016; Lindquist et al., 2016). In Mexico, D. variabilis has been documented in 18 of 32 states throughout the country (Guzmán-Cornejo et al., 2016). Traditionally, D. variabilis has been considered absent from the Rocky Mountain region of North America, with a related species, D. andersoni, aptly called the Rocky Mountain wood tick, present in this area. However, as far back as 1939, there have been reports that these two Dermacentor spp. overlapped in distribution in eastern California, southern Oregon, in addition to localities in Montana, North and South Dakota, and Nebraska in the United States, and in south-central Saskatchewan in Canada (Gibbons, 1939; Bishopp and Trembley, 1945; Dergousoff et al., 2013). Generally, D. andersoni is found in areas with hot and dry summers, while D. variabilis is in areas with summers that are more humid (Wilkinson, 1967).

Dermacentor variabilis is commonly found questing in low elevation grasslands and along the forest edge in addition to the boundaries of trails and roadways (Easton et al., 1977; Sonenshine, 1979; Dergousoff et al., 2013). Typical host species for D. variabilis range from small mammals such as voles (Microtus spp.) and chipmunks (Tamias spp.) for immature ticks to medium and larger-sized mammals such as opossums (Didelphis virginianus), raccoons (Procyon lotor), dogs, white-tailed deer, and humans for adult ticks (Kollars et al., 2000). Populations of American dog ticks in Canada have expanded greatly northward in recent years and it is considered established in portions of Ontario, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and Nova Scotia (Dergousoff et al., 2013; Yunik et al., 2015; Wood et al., 2016). Recent work predicting the future range of D. variabilis in response to climate change indicated that areas of suitable habitat could increase by as much as 50% over the next 50 years (Minigan et al., 2018), allowing for even further northward expansion of the American dog tick into northern parts of Canada. Additionally, suitable alternate hosts for immature stages of D. variabilis (Sonenshine, 2018) are present, supporting the recent northward expansion.

Dermacentor variabilis is an ornate reddish-brown tick; both males and females have a distinct lacy silvery-white pattern covering the scutum, a rectangular basis capitulum with the width exceeding the length, and palps that are relatively broad and short (Fig. 4). All life stages of Dermacentor spp. have festoons and eyes, but only adults possess ornate scuta (Brinton et al., 1965). Several species of Dermacentor have similar appearances making morphologic identification difficult (Goddard et al., 2020). Geography has traditionally been used to inform specific identification, but recent work has demonstrated that in areas that were historically considered D. andersoni range, D. variabilis may be the more abundant tick (Dergousoff et al., 2013; Duncan et al., 2021). Keys are available to differentiate adult and immature Dermacentor ticks, but in cases where there is uncertainty molecular techniques to speciate ticks should be utilized.

Fig. 4.

Dermacentor variabilis, American dog tick, dorsal and ventral view of each stage and description of key morphologic features. From top to bottom: Female, male, nymph, larva. Descriptions adapted from:

1Keirans, J.E., and T.R. Litwak. 1989. Pictorial key to the adults of hard ticks, family Ixodidae (Ixodida: Ixodoidea), East of the Mississippi River. Journal of Medical Entomology 26: 435–448.

2Brinton, E. P.; D.E. Beck, and D.M. Allred. 1965. Identification of the adults, nymphs and larvae of ticks of the genus Dermacentor Koch (Ixodidae) in the western United States. Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biological Series: Vol. 5 : No. 4, Article 1.

American dog ticks commonly attach and feed on both dogs and cats throughout their geographic range. While ticks can be found anywhere on the host, a significant dorsal preference is seen for attachment, with most ticks being found on the head, neck, ears, and back for both dogs and cats (Koch, 1982; Little et al., 2018; Saleh et al., 2019). An engorged female American dog tick consumes more than 1.4 mL of blood from a canine host (Koch and Sauer, 1984). Compared to other ixodid ticks when feeding the mouthparts of D. variabilis are restricted to the superficial epidermis, but a large amount of cement is secreted resulting in marked hypertrophy of the epidermis at the site of attachment (Moorhouse, 1969).

Dermacentor variabilis transmits a variety of pathogens to dogs and cats via saliva during tick feeding (Table 1). The most important are R. rickettsii and other spotted fever group Rickettsia spp., as well as F. tularensis (Philip and Jellison., 1934; Allison and Little, 2013). However, American dog ticks are considered a possible secondary or minor vector for a number of other pathogens including Cytauxzoon felis, E. chaffeensis, and E. ewingii, which are more commonly transmitted by the lone star tick (Reichard et al., 2010; Little, 2010).

In North America D. variabilis is one of the most important vectors of R. rickettsii, especially in the southeastern and central United States (McDade and Newhouse, 1986; Hecht et al., 2019). Rickettsia rickettsii is maintained in D. variabilis populations transovarially and transstadially, making the tick both the vector and reservoir of the pathogen (McDade and Newhouse, 1986). Canine serosurveys identified R. rickettsii antibodies in 10.4% of dogs in the United States (Yancey et al., 2014). However, PCR surveys of D. variabilis often do not detect R. rickettsii DNA or detect it at a very low prevalence, less than 1% (Stromdahl et al., 2010; Hecht et al., 2019), but often detect other spotted fever group Rickettsii spp., such as R. montanensis (Fritzen et al., 2011; Little et al., 2018).

The proportion of D. variabilis infected with a pathogen varies depending on the specific pathogen and the geographic location. Cytauxzoon felis is present in the eastern and southern regions of the United States. The bobcat is considered the historic reservoir, but in recent years domestic cats with persistent infections have been considered potentially important reservoirs of C. felis (Birkenheuer et al., 2008; Reichard et al., 2010). Reported prevalences of C. felis detected via PCR from healthy asymptomatic cats in the southern United States range from less than 1% up to 30.3% (Haber et al., 2007; Brown et al., 2010; Rizzi et al., 2015; Nagamori, 2016). DNA of C. felis was detected in 0–15.8% of D. variabilis tested from the central and southern United States (Bondy et al., 2005; Shock et al., 2014; Zieman et al., 2017; Little et al., 2018). However, A. americanum is now considered an important vector of C. felis and covers a large portion of the geographic region where cytauxzoonosis occurs most commonly (Reichard et al., 2010; Mueller et al., 2013).

While D. variabilis has been shown to transmit Ehrlichia canis experimentally, this pathogen has only been described from field-caught D. variabilis in a few reports (Johnson et al., 1998; Sosa-Gutierrez et al., 2016). Ehrlichia chaffeensis has been documented in 0–6.7% of field-collected D. variabilis in Virginia, Kentucky, and Missouri, while the prevalence of E. ewingii in these ticks was slightly lower ranging from 0 to 3.3% (Steiert and Gilfoy, 2002; Fritzen et al., 2011; Wright et al., 2014). DNA of E. ewingii has also been recovered from D. variabilis removed from an infected dog in Oklahoma (Murphy et al., 1998).

Humans and dogs are both susceptible to infection with R. rickettsii from D. variabilis (Nicholson et al., 2010). Infection with R. rickettsii in cats is considered uncommon (Allison and Little, 2013). Concurrent infections with R. rickettsii and Ehrlichia spp. have been documented in humans and their pet dogs in the United States (Buller et al., 1999; Paddock et al., 2002; Elchos and Goddard, 2003). Dermacentor variabilis is a principal vector of R. rickettsii to both dogs and humans in the eastern and central United States, while in the West, D. andersoni is considered the more important vector of R. rickettsii. The majority of Rocky Mountain spotted fever cases reported in humans in the United States originate from states extending from Oklahoma and Missouri east to North Carolina and Virginia (Drexler et al., 2017; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2018). Dermacentor variabilis is also an important vector of F. tularensis, and is considered a key source of human infection (Klock et al., 1973; Petersen et al., 2009). Dogs and cats are typically infected with F. tularensis after contact with or ingestion of infected tissues from rabbits or other wild mammals; clinical disease is most commonly seen in cats and is considered rare in dogs (Feldman et al., 2003). Additionally, the absorption of toxins from D. variabilis saliva can sometimes result in tick paralysis (Lane et al., 1984; Gothe and Neitz, 1991; Diaz, 2010).

Haemaphysalis longicornis (longhorned tick)

Historically Haemaphysalis spp. in North America have been considered ticks of wildlife with limited medical and veterinary importance, rarely infesting domestic animals and people (Keirans and Litwak, 1989; Egizi et al., 2019). The rabbit tick, H. leporispalustris, has been infrequently found on dogs in North America, while H. chordeilis and H. juxtakochi primarily infest birds and ungulates, respectively (Bishopp and Trembley, 1945; Kohls, 1960; Lindquist et al., 2016). However, in 2017, natural infestations with the longhorned tick, H. longicornis, were identified for the first time in North America from a sheep in New Jersey, United States (Rainey et al., 2018; United States Department of Agriculture, 2020). Haemaphysalis longicornis is native to East Asia and is established in Australia and New Zealand (Hoogstraal et al., 1968), where it is considered a significant pest of people, livestock, and companion animals (Shimada et al., 2003; Heath, 2013; Heath, 2016; Greay et al., 2016). Since the initial report in 2017, H. longicornis has been reported in 15 different states in the eastern and south-central United States and on numerous hosts including humans, dogs, and cats in addition to domestic livestock (cattle, sheep) and wildlife (white-tailed deer, coyotes, raccoons, opossums), with its range continuing to increase (Beard et al., 2018; Saleh et al., 2019; United States Department of Agriculture, 2020). Subsequent reexamination of archived samples demonstrated that H. longicornis has been infesting North American wildlife since at least 2010 (Beard et al., 2018). Introduced populations of the longhorned tick are parthenogenic (Oliver et al., 1973; Heath, 2013; Rainey et al., 2018).

Haemaphysalis longicornis thrive in humid, warm-temperate conditions but can tolerate temperatures ranging from −2 °C to 40 °C and occupy a variety of climates and latitudes (Hoogstraal et al., 1968; Sutherst and Moorhouse, 1972; Heath, 2013, 2016). Populations are often found among long grass and rushes (Heath, 2016), with unfed nymphs surviving longer in areas with long as opposed to short grass (Sutherst and Bourne, 1991). In the first recognized infestations in New Jersey, United States, all feeding stages of longhorned ticks were recovered from the sheep, and larvae were found on vegetation within the sheep paddock, but not outside the paddock where the grass was mowed (Rainey et al., 2018).

As a recently established species, the seasonality of North American populations of H. longicornis is still being determined, but early work in the northeastern United States found that activity of adult longhorned ticks peaked in late July, with nymphs peaking from June to July, and larvae having the highest activity in August (Tufts et al., 2019). This pattern is similar to that seen in populations of H. longicornis in South Korea and China (Zheng et al., 2012; Johnson et al., 2017). The full extent of the longhorned tick’s geographic distribution in North America is currently unknown. Habitat and climate preferences of H. longicornis in other regions have been used to model the potential range of this species in North America. Although predictions vary, potential ranges include the southeastern United States, the Pacific Coast extending into Canada, as well as Mexico, and areas of the Great Lakes region in the United States and Canada (Raghavan et al., 2019; Rochlin, 2019). To date, both models confirm extensive suitable habitat for H. longicornis in the southeastern and central Midwestern United States (Raghavan et al., 2019; Rochlin, 2019).

Adult H. longicornis are inornate, reddish-brown ticks with short mouthparts and a rectangular dorsal basis capitulum with straight lateral margins (Fig. 5). The lateral projection of the second palpal segment is characteristic of the genus; eyes are absent, but festoons are present (Cooley, 1946). Haemaphysalis longicornis adults are differentiated from its cogeners in North America (H. chordeilis, H. juxtakochi, and H. leporispalustris) by the presence of a dorsal spur on the third palpal segment, and keys are available to aid in the identification of adults and immature stages (Cooley, 1946; Egizi et al., 2019).

Fig. 5.

Haemaphysalis longicornis, longhorned tick, bush tick, cattle tick, dorsal and ventral view of female (top), nymph (middle), larva (bottom) and description of key morphologic features. Descriptions adapted from:

1Keirans, J.E., and T.R. Litwak. 1989. Pictorial key to the adults of hard ticks, family Ixodidae (Ixodida: Ixodoidea), East of the Mississippi River. Journal of Medical Entomology 26: 435–448.

2Hoogstraal, H., F.H.S. Roberts, G.M. Kohls, V.J. Tipton. 1968. Review of Haemaphysalis (Kaiseriana) longicornis Neumann (resurrected) of Australia, New Zealand, New Caledonia, Fiji, Japan, Korea, and Northeastern China and USSR, and its parthenogenic and bisexual populations (Ixodoidea, Ixodidae). Journal of Parasitology 54: 1197–1213.

3Egizi, A.M., R.G. Robbins, L. Beati, S. Nava, C.R. Evans, J.L. Occi, D.M. Fonseca. 2019. A pictorial key to differentiate the recently detected exotic Haemaphysalis longicornis Neumann, 1901 (Acari, Ixodidae) from native congeners in North America. ZooKeys 818: 117–128.

In parts of the world where H. longicornis is established, longhorned ticks readily infest dogs and cats and are commonly removed from pets (Iwakami et al., 2014; Greay et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2017). On livestock and wildlife hosts, H. longicornis was found to infest the head and ears, including the periocular region more commonly than elsewhere on the host (Heath et al., 1987; Zheng et al., 2011, 2012). This attachment preference was also noted in the recent North American introduction in New Jersey where ticks were concentrated on the face and ears of the infested sheep (Rainey et al., 2018). Attachment site preferences for dogs and cats have not been reported.

Haemaphysalis longicornis is capable of transmitting several pathogens to pets, livestock, and people (Beard et al., 2018). To date, there have been no reports of pathogens recovered from longhorned ticks removed from dogs and cats in North America, and the only pathogen reported from the United States has been Theileria orientalis Ikeda genotype in host seeking H. longicornis from Virginia (Beard et al., 2018; Thompson et al., 2020). Under experimental conditions, H. longicornis failed to transmit B. burgdorferi sensu stricto (s.s.), the causative agent of Lyme disease, but it was able to acquire and transmit R. rickettsii at a very low frequency between tick generations (Breuner et al., 2020; Stanley et al., 2020). The importance of H. longicornis as an experimentally competent vector of R. rickettsii in North America is unknown at this time, but highlights the need for additional studies to determine the potential role of longhorned ticks in pathogen transmission in North America.

In its historic range H. longicornis transmits several different pathogens including severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus (SFTSV), which causes a hemorrhagic fever in people (Luo et al., 2015). However, while H. longicornis has been shown to attach and feed on people in North America, to date no human pathogens have been recovered from these ticks (Beard et al., 2018; Thompson et al., 2020; Tufts et al., 2019). The apparent rapid spread of H. longicornis in North America, specifically in the eastern United States, has been partially attributed to its ability to reproduce parthenogenetically (Stanley et al., 2020). As the longhorned tick becomes further established and more widespread in North America, its involvement in transmission of zoonotic pathogens warrants further consideration.

Ixodes scapularis (black-legged tick, deer tick) and Ixodes pacificus (western black-legged tick)

Ixodes spp. are ticks of wildlife that readily infest domestic animals and people. Approximately 40 Ixodes spp. have been described in North America, and several have been reported from dogs and cats in this region, including I. affinis, I. angustus, I. banksi, I. cookei, I. kingi, I. marxi, I. muris, and I. texanus (Rand et al., 2007; Durden et al., 2016; Nadolny and Gaff, 2018; Little et al., 2018; Saleh et al., 2019; Ghosh et al., 2021). However, by far the most common species found on domestic animals, including pets, are I. scapularis in the eastern United States and I. pacificus in the West; these two species will be the focus of the current review.

Just a few decades ago, I. scapularis populations were considered to be somewhat concentrated in fairly focal areas of the upper Midwestern and northeastern United States, with additional populations present in the South (Dennis et al., 1998). Apparent changes in habitat, host, and climate in recent years have allowed this tick to re-establish throughout most of eastern North America, with populations of I. scapularis now found from the Atlantic Coast across to central Texas and up into eastern North Dakota and extending as far north as the southern regions of the Western, Central, and Atlantic provinces of Canada (Eisen et al., 2016a; Clow et al., 2017). In contrast, the geographic range of I. pacificus in western North America has remained fairly stable and extends from the foothills of the Sierra Nevada in California northward into British Columbia (Eisen et al., 2016a).

Ixodes scapularis and I. pacificus populations are found in wooded habitats. A dense understory and accumulation of leaf litter provides favorable microclimates for development and survival of immature and adult ticks in the environment (Lindsay et al., 1999). Seasonal activity of the different stages varies by geographic region. In northern North America, adult I. scapularis are usually most active in the fall and winter with peak activity in October and November when temperatures are between 5–15 °C; a second, smaller peak of adult activity occurs with the onset of spring weather in March and April. In contrast, in Florida and South Carolina, adult I. scapularis activity is highest January through March (Ogden et al., 2004, 2018). In northern regions of North America, immature I. scapularis are most commonly found questing in late spring and summer. Nymphs become active at 15–25 °C and often emerge a few weeks before the larvae of the next generation (Ogden et al., 2004). The pattern of activity for immature stages in the southern United States is less well defined; immature stages in this region quest below the leaf litter, usually feed on lizards rather than small mammals, and are rarely found on people or pets (Oliver, 1996; Arsnoe et al., 2015; Little et al., 2018; Saleh et al., 2019). In northwestern California, adult I. pacificus quest from late October through May with activity peaking in January, nymphs are active January through October, and larvae are found April through June. At the southern extent of the I. pacificus range, seasonal activity, particularly of the immature stages, is confined to a much shorter period of time and all three stages are primarily active in the winter (Salkeld et al., 2014; MacDonald and Briggs, 2016).

Recent increases in the distribution of I. scapularis in the northern and mid-Atlantic United States have been attributed to re-establishment of the historical range of this tick, continuing a trend seen for the past several decades (Spielman, 1994; Eisen et al., 2016a). This range expansion of I. scapularis is considered to be a result of the combined influences of habitat change, increase in white-tailed deer populations, and climate change (Eisen et al., 2016b; Ogden et al., 2018). In the past two decades, the previously distinct foci of tick populations in the northeastern and upper Midwestern United States have largely converged (Eisen et al., 2016a). Ixodes scapularis populations have also spread across western New York, western Pennsylvania, and northern Maine, as well as into higher elevations of Appalachia (Simmons et al., 2015; Herrin et al., 2014; Eddens et al., 2019; Dewage et al., 2019), putting more people and pets at risk of both I. scapularis infestation and infection with associated pathogens (Little et al., 2021).

Adult Ixodes spp. are inornate, reddish brown to black in color, and have mouthparts longer than the basis capitulum (Fig. 6). Both eyes and festoons are absent. All stages (larva, nymph, adult) of Ixodes spp. bear a distinct anal groove that arches anterior to the anus. Confirming identification to the species level, even for adult ticks, may require consultation with a diagnostic laboratory with specific expertise; for less common species, both morphologic and molecular identification may be preferred. The presence and number of spurs on the coxae, shape of the scutum, and pattern of dentition on the hypostome are all helpful in confirming the identity of a given Ixodes sp. specimen. Adult I. scapularis have prominent internal spurs on the first pair of coxae. Keys are available to aid in identification of adult and immature Ixodes spp. (Keirans and Litwak, 1989; Durden and Keirans, 1996).

Fig. 6.

Ixodes scapularis, black-legged tick or deer tick, dorsal and ventral view of each stage and description of key morphologic features. From top to bottom: Female, male, nymph, larva. Descriptions adapted from:

1Keirans, J.E., and T.R. Litwak. 1989. Pictorial key to the adults of hard ticks, family Ixodidae (Ixodida: Ixodoidea), East of the Mississippi River. Journal of Medical Entomology 26: 435–448.

2Durden, L.A., and J.E. Keirans. 1996. Nymphs of the Genus Ixodes (Acari: Ixodidae) of the United States: Taxonomy, Identification Key, Distribution, Hosts, and Medical Importance. Thomas Say Publications in Entomology: Monographs. Lanham, Maryland. 76 pp.

3Coley, K. 2015. Identification Guide to Larval Stages of Ticks of Medical Importance in the USA. University Honors Program Thesis, paper 110. Georgia Southern University.

Ixodes scapularis and I. pacificus have broad host ranges. Larvae, nymphs, and adult I. scapularis infest and feed on a diverse array of wild and domestic mammals, birds, and reptiles (Yuval and Spielman, 1990). However, differences are observed in host preference according to geographic location and tick species (Bishopp and Trembley, 1945; Cooley and Kohls, 1945; Keirans et al., 1996; Castro and Wright, 2007). Surveying naturally infested hosts throughout the range of I. scapularis demonstrated that immature black-legged ticks in northern areas feed on small mammals (e.g., white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus), shrews (Soricidae), chipmunks, etc.) followed by ground-dwelling birds (Mather et al., 1989). In southern areas, immature I. scapularis prefer to feed on lizards (Oliver et al., 1993a) over small mammals. In comparison to surveys of naturally infested animals, host- selection experiments conducted in the lab (James and Oliver, 1990), demonstrated that when given a choice, immature I. scapularis, regardless of whether ticks originated from northern or southern populations, preferentially feed on mice over other hosts. It is likely that natural feeding patterns of I. scapularis result from a multitude of variables (e.g., host availability, questing duration, questing height, climate, etc.), many of which have yet to be elucidated in detail (James and Oliver, 1990). Regardless of geographic location, both northern and southern adult I. scapularis feed (Oliver et al., 1993b) and rely (Wilson et al., 1990) on white-tailed deer to maintain tick populations. In addition to white-tailed deer, other medium and large-sized mammals are commonly infested with I. scapularis adults and nymphs.

In a national survey of ticks on canine and feline companion animals recovered by veterinarians in the United States, I. scapularis was present on 27.4% (409 of 1494) of infested dogs and 46.4% (156 of 336) of cats (Saleh et al., 2019). Dogs were mostly infested with adult I. scapularis but a few nymphs were also recorded. Cats were also mostly infested with adult I. scapularis but a larger proportion of nymphs and larvae were recovered from cats. Proportions of dogs and cats with I. scapularis vary depending on geographic region with differences in tick activity based on local climate and weather (Eisen et al., 2016b). Examination of tick infested dogs from southeastern Oklahoma and northwestern Arkansas (Koch, 1982) noted adult I. scapularis attached to the head and neck. Saleh et al. (2019) also demonstrated that I. scapularis adults preferentially attached to the head, ears, neck and dorsum of infested dogs. Similarly, I. scapularis were commonly recovered from the head, ears, neck, and dorsum of infested cats (Little et al., 2018; Saleh et al., 2019).

In the western United States, I. pacificus also infests a diverse array of wild and domestic mammals, birds, and lizards (Padgett and Lane, 2001; Castro and Wright, 2007). Western fence lizards (Sceloporus occidentalis) are considered preferred hosts for immature I. pacificus which are found more in greater abundance and prevalence on reptiles compared to wild deer mice (Peromyscus spp.) and pinyon mice (P. truei) (Lane and Loye, 1989). Columbian black-tailed deer (O. hemionus columbianus) along with other medium and large-sized mammals are hosts for adult I. pacificus (Padgett and Lane, 2001).

In comparison to humans, I. scapularis and I. pacificus transmit relatively few pathogens to dogs and cats, namely Anaplasma phagocytophilum and B. burgdorferi (Table 1). Ixodes scapularis also transmits Ehrlichia muris eauclairensis in the upper Midwest. From a public health perspective, I. scapularis presents a serious public health concern as this tick vectors seven known pathogens to humans: Anaplasma phagocytophilum, B. burgdorferi, B. mayonii, B. miyamotoi, E. muris eauclairensis, Babesia microti, and Powassan virus (Eisen and Eisen, 2018). Nymphal I. scapularis, in particular, are an important stage for pathogen transmission in the Northeast and Upper Midwest of the United States (Mather et al., 1996; Diuk-Wasser et al., 2010). On the West Coast, I. pacificus vectors A. phagocytophilum and B. burgdorferi, and is a presumed vector of B. miyamotoi to humans (Eisen and Paddock, 2020). Dogs and cats are not primary hosts for any of these pathogens and humans become infected from spill-over events from wild animal reservoirs.

Anaplasma phagocytophilum was shown to be transmitted by I. scapularis in 1996 (Telford et al., 1996), and I. pacificus in 2006 (Teglas and Foley, 2006). Ticks become infected by feeding on A. phagocytophilum infected wild rodents such as the white-footed mouse and eastern chipmunk in the eastern and Midwestern United States, and dusky-footed woodrats (Neotoma fuscipes), gray squirrels (Sciurus griseus), and chipmunks in western states (Carrade et al., 2009). Seroprevalence of A. phagocytophilum in dogs has been decreasing in mid-Atlantic states (e.g., Connecticut, Maryland, New Jersey, Rhode Island) as well as in Virginia, Minnesota, and Wisconsin (Dewage et al., 2019). However, seroprevalence of A. phagocytophilum has continued to increase in Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont (Dewage et al., 2019). Cats living in A. phagocytophilum endemic areas can be seropositive but clinical disease appears uncommon (Billeter et al., 2007a, b; Lappin et al., 2020).

Prevalence of A. phagocytophilum in I. scapularis ranges from 0.1–20% in adults and 2.7–13% in nymphs (reviewed by Little and Molaei, 2020). One study suggested that I. scapularis were 98% more likely to be infected with A. phagocytophilum if infected with B. burgdorferi compared to ticks not infected (Little and Molaei, 2020). Prevalence of A. phagocytophilum in I. pacificus ranges from 0.4–4.3% in adults to 0.0–0.2% in nymphs (Eisen and Paddock, 2020).

Borrelia burgdorferi was first identified as the etiological agent of Lyme disease in 1982 (Burgdorfer et al., 1982). Experimental infections of B. burgdorferi in laboratory-reared dogs corroborated observations of naturally infected dogs in that Lyme disease was a multisystemic, polyarthritic condition in canines (Appel et al., 1993). Estimates of B. burgdorferi antibodies in dogs across the United States suggests a decrease in seroprevalence in several states along the mid-Atlantic coast and in Wisconsin (Dewage et al., 2019). These numbers are in stark contrast to an increase in the seroprevalence of B. burgdorferi antibodies in dogs from other northeastern and Midwestern states (e.g., Iowa, Michigan, Maine, New York, Pennsylvania) where Lyme borreliosis is endemic or emerging, as well as in a few states in the upper South (e.g., North Carolina, South Carolina, West Virginia) (Dewage et al., 2019; Little et al., 2021). Cats are susceptible to infection with B. burgdorferi but little is known about the clinical course of the disease (Hoyt et al., 2018; Lappin et al., 2015; Magnarelli et al., 2005).

In New England and the upper Midwestern United States, the prevalence of B. burgdorferi in I. scapularis is relatively high compared to other tick-borne pathogens, typically ranging from 24–64% in adults and 10–23% in nymphs (Tilly et al., 2008; Hamer et al., 2010; Turtinen et al., 2015; Little and Molaei, 2020), depending on experimental methodology, sampling strategy, and endemicity of sampling location. In other regions of the United States, the prevalence of B. burgdorferi is much lower to non-detectable (Maggi et al., 2019). Although, recent data suggests that prevalence of B. burgdorferi is increasing in I. scapularis in areas where the tick is expanding in range (Hickling et al., 2018). Immature ticks become infected when they ingest the spirochete while feeding on B. burgdorferi infected wild rodents (Mather et al., 1989). Nymphal I. scapularis are considered the most important stage for transmitting B. burgdorferi to humans and animals (Mather et al., 1996; Diuk-Wasser et al., 2010). Questing nymphs of I. scapularis are rarely collected by dragging techniques or found infesting people in the southeastern United States (Arsnoe et al., 2015). The prevalence of B. burgdorferi in I. pacificus is considerably lower than that of I. scapularis, with estimates usually less than 5% (Burgdorfer et al., 1985; MacDonald et al., 2017). Analysis of I. pacificus and other ticks in California for infection with B. burgdorferi suggest the highest risk of Lyme disease is in north-central and Sierra Nevada foothill regions of the state with little to no risk in southern regions (Rose et al., 2019).

Ehrlichia muris eauclairensis was first identified in human patients in the upper Midwest with most cases occurring in Minnesota and Wisconsin (Pritt et al., 2011; Johnson et al., 2015; Pritt et al., 2017). Ixodes scapularis larvae were able to acquire and nymphs were able to transmit E. muris eauclairensis to C57BL/6 J mice (Karpathy et al., 2016). Prevalence of E. muris eauclairensis was 2.9% (22 of 757) in I. scapularis adults and 0.9% (10 of 1150) in nymphs (Murphy et al., 2017). Electron microscopy demonstrated that E. muris eauclairensis exhibits an affinity for epithelial cells, neuronal cells of the synganglion, salivary glands, and male accessory glands of I. scapularis (Lynn et al., 2015). Infection of E. muris eauclairensis in a dog resulted in decreased appetite, lethargy, recurrent bouts of vomiting, and fever (Hegarty et al., 2012). Dogs seroconvert to infection with E. muris eauclairensis and antibodies to the pathogen are thought to contribute to the rise in seroprevalence to Ehrlichia spp. in the upper Midwest (Little et al., 2014).

Both I. scapularis and I. pacificus bite and feed on humans. In addition to the risk of pathogen transmission (Eisen and Eisen, 2018), tick bites are painful and annoy humans (Merten and Durden, 2000; Nelder et al., 2014; Lindquist et al., 2016). Borrelia burgdorferi that causes Lyme disease in humans is the most commonly reported vector-borne pathogen in the United States (Rosenberg et al., 2018). All stages of I. scapularis are commonly reported from people in the eastern and northern United States (Merten and Durden, 2000) and eastern Ontario (Nelder et al., 2014). Ixodes pacificus are commonly recovered from humans in far western states (Merten and Durden, 2000). Despite a basic understanding of the epidemiology of I. scapularis and Lyme disease, infestations of black-legged ticks on humans (Eisen and Eisen, 2018) and companion animals continue to commonly occur (Saleh et al., 2019). Furthermore, it appears I. scapularis is expanding its range in the upper Midwest, northeast and mid-Atlantic regions, while remaining stable in the southeastern United States (Eisen et al., 2016a).

Risk of infestation with I. scapularis is highest for humans in woodland, mixed grassy, brushy, or ecotones of natural areas located around domestic and peridomestic communities or recreation areas (Carroll et al., 1992; Stafford and Connecticut Agricultural Experiment, S., 2007; Hahn et al., 2018). Outdoor recreational activities (Salkeld et al., 2019) and contact with wood (e.g., sitting on logs, gathering wood, sitting against trees, walking, stirring and sitting on leaf litter, just sitting on leaf litter) increase the risk of I. pacificus infestation (Lane et al., 2004). Engorgement indices quantifying specific tick morphological measurements at known time intervals have been developed to estimate duration of attachment as an indirect indicator for risk of pathogen transmission (Yeh et al., 1995). Over 60% of infested people removed I. scapularis adults by 36 h of attachment, but only 10% found and removed nymphal blacklegged ticks within the first 24 h of feeding (Yeh et al., 1995).

Rhipicephalus spp. (brown dog ticks)

Brown dog ticks (Rhipicephalus spp.) have the widest geographic distribution of any tick in the world and are now recognized to be a species group comprised of as many as five different species, or operational taxonomic units (OTUs), including R. sanguineus sensu lato (=tropical) and R. sp. I–IV (Dantas-Torres et al., 2013). Because the taxonomy is still under debate, this review will refer to these ticks as Rhipicephalus spp. or brown dog ticks. Two main populations of brown dog ticks have been identified in North America to date. Commonly referred to as “tropical” and “temperate,” these populations do not mate and produce offspring, and can be distinguished from one another on the basis of mitochondrial sequences (16S rDNA, 12S rDNA, and cox1), morphology, and through cross-breeding experiments (Levin et al., 2012; Dantas-Torres et al., 2013; Sanches et al., 2016; Zemtsova et al., 2016; Jones et al., 2017). Intense brown dog tick infestations are more common in warmer areas in the region including Mexico, the Caribbean, and the southern United States. However, due to the propensity of these ticks to establish and flourish indoors, populations of brown dog ticks can be found anywhere there are dogs (Dryden and Payne, 2004).

Brown dog ticks have a strong host preference for dogs and are distinctly endophilic. Accordingly, infestations are commonly associated with kennels or homes where dogs are present, and these ticks are often found crawling on walls, emerging from gaps in the structures, under upholstery cushions, and in carpeted areas where the dogs spend the majority of their time. In warmer areas, these ticks can also survive outdoors so long as cracks and crevices in walls, between rocks, or in the ground are present to provide safe havens for egg deposition by females (Walker et al., 2000; Dantas-Torres, 2010). Although translocation events occasionally occur, tropical brown dog ticks are generally found in areas with annual mean temperatures of >20 °C and temperate brown dog ticks are present where annual mean temperatures are less than 20 °C (Zemtsova et al., 2016; Jones et al., 2017). This disparate species distribution is thought to be related, in part, to poor survival of fed immature stages of tropical brown dog ticks under more severe winter conditions (Labruna et al., 2017).

Survey of dogs has shown infestations with adult brown dog ticks in Oklahoma are most common in July, August, and September, with a second, smaller peak of adult activity in March, April, and May. Larvae were only found on dogs June through September, and nymphs were present in July and again in September and October (Koch, 1982). In Mexico, dogs were found infested with all stages throughout the year although prevalence of infestation was highest spring through fall and lowest in the winter months (Cruz-Vazquez and Garcia-Vazquez, 1999). Brown dog ticks exhibit a strong host preference for domestic dogs in all stages (larvae, nymphs, adults) although specimens are occasionally reported from cats and people (Demma et al., 2005; Thomas et al., 2016; Little et al., 2018; Saleh et al., 2019). In recent years, apparent rapid northward expansion of tropical brown dog ticks has been identified in California and western Arizona (Villarreal et al., 2018).

Adult Rhipicephalus spp. are inornate, reddish brown, and have relatively short mouthparts and a hexagonal basis capitulum (Fig. 7). Both festoons and eyes are present. The different taxonomic groups are considered morphologically similar although morphology varies, including in the appearance of festoons, Haller’s organ, accessory shield, adanal shield, and spiracular plates (Dantas-Torres et al., 2013; Caetano et al., 2017). Short mouthparts that are approximately the length of the hexagonal basis capitulum are also evident on larvae and nymphs (Dantas-Torres, 2010).

Fig. 7.

Rhipicephalus sp., brown dog tick, dorsal and ventral view of each stage and description of key morphologic features. From top to bottom: Female, male, nymph, larva. Descriptions adpated from:

1Keirans, J.E., and T.R. Litwak. 1989. Pictorial key to the adults of hard ticks, family Ixodidae (Ixodida: Ixodoidea), East of the Mississippi River. Journal of Medical Entomology 26: 435–448.

2Walker, J.B., J.E. Keiran, and I.G. Horak. 2000. The genus Rhipicephalus (Acari, Ixodidae): A guide to the brown ticks of the world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York. 643 pp.

3Coley, K. 2015. Identification Guide to Larval Stages of Ticks of Medical Importance in the USA. University Honors Program Thesis, paper 110. Georgia Southern University.

Brown dog ticks readily attach to and feed on dogs, and the presence of dogs is critical to long-term establishment of a population of these ticks in a given area. Rhipicephalus spp. ticks may attach and feed anywhere and on any dog, and adults are documented to move between infested dogs resulting in interrupted feeding (Little et al., 2007). However, both feeding site preferences and breed preferences of brown dog ticks have been described. A slight but significant dorsal preference is seen for attachment, and most ticks are found on the head, especially the ears, and the back, but brown dog ticks also readily attach between the toes and in the inguinal and axillary regions (Dantas-Torres, 2010; Saleh et al., 2019). A comparison study using co-housed dogs of different breeds revealed Cocker Spaniel dogs harbored many more ticks than Beagles in the same environment, suggesting ticks were less attracted to Beagles (Louly et al., 2010).

Dogs with brown dog tick infestations often present with very high numbers of ticks, and blood loss anemia — at times severe and life threatening — can occur when infestations are intense (Dantas-Torres, 2010; Herndon and Little, 2015). Bite site reactions may become inflamed and secondary infections occasionally develop, especially with high intensity infestations, but due in part to shorter mouthparts, the trauma caused by brown dog tick feeding is often less severe than that of other tick species. However, brown dog ticks transmit a wide array of pathogens to dogs (Table 1), including Babesia vogeli, E. canis, R. rickettsii, and other spotted fever group Rickettsia spp. (Dantas-Torres, 2010). Most of these agents are transmitted through saliva during tick feeding, but for Hepatozoon canis dogs ingest the tick to become infected (Baneth et al., 2007). While suspected, tick transmission has not been confirmed for some Rhipicephalus sp.-associated pathogens in North America including A. platys, Cercopithifilaria sp., H. canis, and Babesia gibsoni (Allen et al., 2008; Dantas-Torres, 2010; Lineberry et al., 2020). The latter agent is considered more likely to move between dogs in this region via fighting and bite wounds (Yeagley et al., 2009).

Disease caused by brown dog tick-transmitted pathogens is much more common in the southern United States, Mexico, and the Caribbean where this tick commonly occurs than in other areas of North America. Even in regions where disease associated with brown dog ticks is well documented, the prevalence of a given bacterial or protozoal pathogen in ticks is usually low (not detected or <1%) in the absence of active, ongoing transmission among dogs on a given premise. However, when ticks are removed from infected dogs, and especially when engorged ticks that contain concentrated blood from several days of feeding are tested, prevalence of infection in ticks may be much higher. For example, in Yucatan, Mexico, 36% of fed brown dog ticks removed from dogs and 45% of those from an animal shelter with ongoing E. canis transmission were PCR positive for E. canis (Pat-Nah et al., 2015). In contrast, PCR for Anaplasma spp. and Ehrlichia spp. failed to confirm any infections in 519 engorged adult brown dog ticks removed from 100 dogs in northern Mexico despite the fact that A. platys was detected in 3 dogs and E. canis was found in 4 dogs (Almazán et al., 2016). In another study in southern California, United States, E. canis was not detected in unfed, questing Rhipicephalus sp. ticks although R. rickettsii was detected by PCR in one tick (Wikswo et al., 2007).

As the strongly preferred host, dogs serve as the reservoir of pathogens transmitted by brown dog ticks, and in the absence of tick control, infection of dogs is very likely. Canine serosurveys and PCR surveys in the Caribbean, where brown dog ticks are common, have documented E. canis antibodies or DNA in 25–50% of dogs and A. platys antibodies or DNA in 10–25% (Yabsley et al., 2008; Qurollo et al., 2014; Starkey et al., 2016). In the southwestern United States, Mexico, and Central America, antibodies reactive to spotted fever group Rickettsia spp. are detected in approximately 10% of dogs tested although during an outbreak canine seroprevalence as high as 70% has been reported (Demma et al., 2006; Wikswo et al., 2007; Moreira-Soto et al., 2016; Pieracci et al., 2019).

Brown dog ticks are an important vector of R. rickettsii in the southwestern United States, Mexico, and Central America. Large outbreaks of human disease have been associated with dog overpopulation, dramatic increases in Rhipicephalus sp. numbers, and spillover leading to human infection (Demma et al., 2005, 2006; Nicholson et al., 2006; Eremeeva et al., 2011). Human cases are more commonly seen in areas where canine seroprevalence is high, and dogs can be used as sentinels to predict risk in humans (Demma et al., 2005; McQuiston et al., 2011). Dogs can also serve as an amplifying host for R. rickettsii, with infection detected in approximately 10% of nymphs and 36% of adults that fed as larvae and nymphs, respectively, on infected dogs (Piranda et al., 2011). Rhipicephalus sp. females also pass R. rickettsii infection transovarially, but the route appears inefficient, suggesting horizontal transmission would be necessary to maintain a source of infected ticks in a given area (Piranda et al., 2011). Rickettsia massiliae has been described in brown dog ticks in North America although the role of this agent as a human pathogen in the region is unclear (Eremeeva et al., 2006; Beeler et al., 2011; Fornadel et al., 2013). Zoonotic infection with E. canis has also been described (Perez et al., 2006).

Otobius megnini (spinose ear tick)

Otobius spp. are soft ticks which parasitize a single host during their life cycle, and only the immature stages are parasitic. Two species present in North America are known to infest dogs and cats — O. megnini and O. lagophilus. Otobius megnini prefers the arid climate of southwestern states, but has extended beyond these regions and infests a variety of animals across the United States including dogs and cats (Soulsby, 1968; Sonenshine and Roe, 2013; Levin, 2016; Little et al., 2018; Saleh et al., 2019); thus, the species is of primary concern in veterinary medicine. Otobius lagophilus, predominantly found in the southwestern United States, infests wild rabbits (Sylvilagus spp. and Lepus spp.) and rarely cats (Cooley and Kohls, 1944a, 1944b; Bacha, 1957).

Otobius megnini, commonly called the spinose ear tick, was first described in 1883 under the scientific name Argas megnini, was later transferred to the genus Ornithodoros, and finally the genus Otobius was erected in 1912 (Keirans and Pound, 2003; Niebuhr et al., 2013). The tick species prefers dry, hot environments and was historically limited to the southwestern United States and Mexico. Immature stages of O. megnini feed within the external ear canals of a variety of mammals including cattle, goats, horses, sheep, wild ungulates, and less frequently dogs and cats (Soulsby, 1968; Sonenshine and Roe, 2013; Levin, 2016; Little et al., 2018; Saleh et al., 2019). Infestation occurs more often in winter and spring months, but O. megnini can be found on animals year-round (Levin, 2016). Seasonal abundance may vary according to geographic region and annual climactic pattern (Nava et al., 2009; Niebuhr et al., 2013).

Time to life cycle completion of O. megnini depends upon humidity and temperature, which influence time of egg incubation, feeding and molting of immatures, oviposition by females, and larval hatch rate (Vial, 2009; Diyes and Rajakaruna, 2017; Rajakaruna and Diyes, 2019). Unfed larvae are quite active; after finding and climbing onto a suitable host, larval spinose ear ticks will migrate to the ears and locate far within the external acoustic meatus to feed and undergo ecdysis. Although O. megnini is generally accepted to have at least two nymphal instars, consensus among all researchers has yet to be reached. Replete nymphs will drop from host ear canals into the environment, seek shelter in protected microenvironments, and molt to adults (Loomis, 1961; Hoogstraal, 1985; Wanchinga and Barker, 1986; Nava et al., 2009; Niebuhr et al., 2013; Diyes and Rajakaruna, 2017; Njaa, 2017; Rajakaruna and Diyes, 2019).

Adult O. megnini are free-living and thrive in semi-arid climates. They are often found within cracks and crevices of tree bark, log fences, barns, in pasture shelters under accumulated debris, and under logs and fence posts. Unmated females can survive an average of nearly 5 months and a maximum of 18 months under laboratory conditions. Males can live an average of 100 days (Niebuhr et al., 2013; Rajakaruna and Diyes, 2019). Adults mate in the environment, and within approximately two weeks gravid females will produce 4–10 egg clutches comprised of often hundreds of eggs; oviposition occurs during a single, protracted gonotrophic cycle. Larvae may emerge within two-week’s time, but this short of a hatch period appears to occur when environmental temperatures are 25–33 °C. Emerged O. megnini larvae may survive in favorable environmental conditions off-host without a blood meal for nearly three months (Wanchinga and Barker, 1986; Niebuhr et al., 2013; Diyes and Rajakaruna, 2017).

The covert anatomic location that spinose ticks parasitize likely resulted in the inadvertent translocation of infested livestock. Now, in addition to southwestern states previously recognized, the tick species is documented in states bordering the Pacific Coast into British Columbia, in southcentral states, and in several southeastern states. Also, spinose ear ticks are now found in Australia, Africa, Asia, Central and South America, and Europe (Niebuhr et al., 2013; Levin, 2016; Rajakaruna and Diyes, 2019).

A related species, O. lagophilus has been rarely reported infesting cats (Cooley and Kohls, 1944a, [Cooley and Kohls, 1944b] 1944b; Bacha, 1957). Otobius lagophilus is primarily found in the southwestern United States, although isolated reports have occurred in other geographic regions including Canada. Otobius lagophilus has a similar biology to O. megnini, but the parasitic phase of O. lagophilus most commonly attaches around the face and ears of hosts, instead of within the ear canals. Adults of O. lagophilus are found free in the environment but can be found within rodent burrows, suggesting rodents may also serve as natural wildlife hosts. Nymphs of O. megnini and O. lagophilus are morphologically similar, but can be differentiated based on integument spine size, hypostome dentition, and spiracular shape. Otobius lagophilus was once suggested as a vector of Colorado tick fever and a poorly characterized spotted fever group rickettsial agent in the 1950s; however, the tick species is not currently known to vector any pathogens (Bacha, 1957).

Adults of O. megnini are non- parasitic and therefore of little clinical significance. Male and female O. megnini possess vestigial mouthparts which are not visible from the dorsal aspect, and their cuticles are somewhat granular. Males and females are morphologically similar except that females are typically larger and have a slightly smaller genital aperture. Adults are greyish to dark brown in color (Diyes and Rajakaruna, 2017). Capitula of nymphs and larvae extend anteriorly when viewed from the dorsal aspect (Fig. 8). Only the nymphal instars have backward-projecting spines that cover the integument; characteristic spines and preferred anatomic location on hosts earned the tick species its common name. Typically, nymphs are the stages observed infesting animals.

Fig. 8.

Otobius megnini, spinose ear tick, dorsal and ventral view of nymph (top) and larva (bottom) and description of key morphologic features. Descriptions adapted from:

1Cooley, R.A., and G.M. Kohls. 1944. The Argasidae of North America, Central America, and Cuba. American Midland Naturalist Monograph No. 1.

Engorged nymphs appear greyish-blue in color, and have a midline constriction that confers a violin-shaped body. Unfed nymphs are less than half the size of engorged nymphs and may appear ivory or reddish brown in color. Larvae are usually not observed infesting hosts due to their small size and location deep within the external ear canal. Engorged larvae may appear greyish, pinkish, or ivory in color. Unfed larvae are minute especially unlikely to be detected within host ear canals or in the environment (Sonenshine and Roe, 2013; Soulsby, 1982; Diyes and Rajakaruna, 2017; Njaa, 2017; Saari, 2019).

Otobius megnini larvae feed for up to two weeks (Niebuhr et al., 2013; Diyes and Rajakaruna, 2017). After this feeding period, they molt to nymphs in host ear canals within two-week’s time (Loomis, 1961; Niebuhr et al., 2013; Diyes and Rajakaruna, 2017). Nymphs feed intermittently for approximately 2–4 months, remaining in the ear of the same host throughout (Loomis, 1961; Vial, 2009; Niebuhr et al., 2013; Diyes and Rajakaruna, 2017). However, the collective parasitic phase of O. megnini has been documented to exceed 200 days (Nava et al., 2009). As nymphs mature and grow, they can be observed feeding in more shallow portions of the ear canal or attached to the auricular dermis (Njaa, 2017).

Consequences of infestation with O. megnini are related to the trauma caused by blood-feeding larvae and nymphs within the ear canal and associated discomfort. Severe irritation leads to otitis externa with a waxy exudate. Local reactions at attachment sites include perivascular to interstitial dermatitis containing abundant eosinophils and neutrophils (Duron et al., 2015; Njaa, 2017). Large numbers of spinose ear ticks can produce ulcerative lesions. Animals may exhibit vigorous head-shaking. Ear scratching and rubbing of the head may lead to excoriation of the ear pinnae (Levin, 2016; Njaa, 2017; Saari, 2019).

Infections of O. megnini with Coxiella burnetii (Q fever), Colorado tick fever virus, F. tularensis, and R. rickettsii have been reported, but the tick’s vector competence for these agents is unknown (Bowman, 2013; Levin, 2016). Investigations into the vector capacity of O. megnini for B. burgdorferi and E. canis have yielded no evidence supporting competence. In general, O. megnini is not considered an important vector of any known pathogenic agent in North America (Ewing et al., 1990; Rajakaruna and Diyes, 2019). The detriment of spinose ear tick infestations seems mainly due to annoyance and direct injury caused by immature instars within the external ear canal (Sonenshine and Roe, 2013; Njaa, 2017; Diyes and Rajakaruna, 2017; Levin, 2016).

Sparse reports of O. megnini infesting humans include immature stages found attached to the conjunctiva of the eye and within the ear canal (Jellison et al., 1948; Naudé et al., 2001; Diyes and Rajakaruna, 2017). Paralysis as a possible result of O. megnini infestation has been documented (Peacock, 1958; Nava et al., 2009). The spinose ear tick was once suspected as a potential vector of C. burnetii and F. tularensis to humans (Jellison et al., 1948; Nava et al., 2009). However, as humans are rarely ever parasitized by O. megnini, the risk of pathogen transmission to humans by this tick species is extraordinarily low.

Ornithodoros spp.

Ornithodoros species are soft ticks that are found worldwide (Mullen and Durden, 2019; Horton, 2015; Elelu, 2018). The two species of concern in companion animal medicine in North America are O. hermsi and O. turicata. Ornithodoros hermsi is found in coniferous forests at elevations of 1500–8000 feet in Rocky Mountain States, in states west of the Rocky Mountains, and in southern British Columbia. Ornithodoros turicata prefers drier habitats at lower elevations; the species is found in southcentral and southwestern states and into Mexico (Dworkin et al., 2008). The subspecies O. turicata americanus, only present in Florida, was proposed based on the marked geographic distance from western populations and possible difference in biology (Beck et al., 1986; Lopez et al., 2016; Krishnavahjala et al., 2018).

Ornithodoros hermsi preferentially feeds on deer and diurnal rodents including chipmunks (Tamias spp.) and tree squirrels (Tamiasciurus spp.), and tends to infest nests or tree cracks and crevices near nests (Fritz et al., 2013; Sage et al., 2017; Talagrand-Reboul et al., 2018). Ornithodoros turicata has been collected in association with numerous mammals including cattle, ground squirrels (Spermophilus spp.), pigs, and prairie dogs (Cynomys spp.) (Donaldson et al., 2016). Coyotes may serve as a natural host of O. turicata in Texas. Ornithodoros turicata is often found in underground burrows and cavern floors. In Florida, O. turicata americanus is consistently found in dens of gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus), suggesting they serve as natural hosts of the tick subspecies. Occasionally, Ornithodoros spp. infesting shelter-seeking wildlife may be translocated to vacation cabins or rustic residences and there subsist on other hosts present including dogs and humans (Dworkin et al., 2008; Donaldson et al., 2016; Lopez et al., 2016; Krishnavahjala et al., 2018; Talagrand-Reboul et al., 2018).

Ornithodoros species possess hypostomes that are well developed and very similar between males, females, and nymphal instars. The integument is comprised of both discs and mammilla which create various patterns that are continuous from dorsal to ventral surfaces. The bodies typically have very flattened appearances except after feeding, in which case the dorsa are markedly convex. As adults, species may be distinguishable by the presence or absence of eyes and tarsal features. Ornithodoros hermsi is significantly smaller than O. turicata. The integument of O. turicata is made up of characteristically conical mammillae, and the tarsi on the first pair of legs have dorsal projections. Nymphal stages can be differentiated from adults by characteristic protuberances on legs, which become more prominent with successive molts (United States Department of Agriculture, 1976; Dworkin et al., 2008).

The life cycles of O. hermsi, O. turicata, and O. turicata americanus are very similar, despite preferring different natural habitats and associated hosts (Beck et al., 1986; Dworkin et al., 2008). Like other Ornithodoros spp., they are endophilic, nidicolous, nocturnal, rapid feeders (≤ 1.5 h until replete), and directly leave hosts after blood meal acquisition. Motile stages include a single larval instar and several successive nymphal instars preceding the molt to females or males. Larvae and younger nymphs require a single blood meal before ecdysis, while larger nymphs feed more than once. Adults feed numerous times during their lifespans, and females oviposit after each blood meal. In the laboratory, nymphs of O. turicata can survive prolonged periods without a blood meal. Adults can survive without a blood meal for 5 years, but can live for over 10 years with regular feedings. Based on field studies, natural Ornithodoros spp. populations may be similarly hardy and long-lived (Beck et al., 1986; Donaldson et al., 2016; Talagrand-Reboul et al., 2018).

Ornithodoros hermsi and O. turicata transmit Borrelia hermsii and Borrelia turicatae, respectively, which are causative agents of tick-borne relapsing fever (TBRF) (Dworkin et al., 2008; Elelu, 2018; Talagrand-Reboul et al., 2018). Geographically, the Borrelia sp. causing TBRF generally corresponds to the distribution of its Ornithodoros sp. vector; in Rocky Mountain and western states, TBRF is predominantly caused by B. hermsii, while in arid regions of the southern United States, TBRF is predominantly caused by B. turicatae (Horton, 2015; Krishnavahjala et al., 2018). Borrelia hermsii and B. turicatae have been isolated from dogs in Washington and Texas, respectively (Kelly et al., 2014). Additionally, B. turicatae was identified in a dog in Florida (Schwan et al., 2009). Ornithodoros turicata americanus is present in Florida, but the natural transmission of B. turicatae by the tick subspecies is not well understood (Krishnavahjala et al., 2018). Rodents and other small mammals are regarded as natural wildlife hosts for TBRF spirochetes (Talagrand-Reboul et al., 2018).

Although Ornithodoros species tend to stay in protected habitats near or where wildlife hosts reside to support their frequent need for blood meals, they are generalists and will feed on other animals in close proximity. Dogs may become infested with Ornithodoros spp. by sleeping in infested cabins or by exploring natural habitats (for example, caves or underground burrows) (Kelly et al., 2014; Elelu, 2018; Talagrand-Reboul et al., 2018). The quick transfer time of Borrelia spp. by Ornithodoros spp., and also that spirochetes may be secreted in both saliva and coxal fluid, facilitates transmission. Borrelia spp. are maintained transstadially in their respective vectors and may transmit transovarially. Despite multiple factors contributing to efficiency of Borrelia spp. transmission by Ornithodoros spp., the diagnosis of TBRF in dogs is rare. As Ornithodoros spp. ticks are fast-feeders, nocturnal, and typically flee hosts after repletion, they are unlikely to be observed by owners. However, TBRF is recognized as an emerging tick-borne disease that is under-diagnosed in veterinary medicine (Dworkin et al., 2008; Elelu, 2018; Talagrand-Reboul et al., 2018).

Ornithodoros spp. occasionally feed on humans. Cases of human TBRF caused by B. hermsii are often seasonal and typically traced back to events in which humans were sleeping in rustic cabins or within sleeping bags in caves in areas of the western United States (Dworkin et al., 2008; Talagrand-Reboul et al., 2018). Human TBRF cases caused by B. turicatae have occurred predominantly in Texas, with older reports in Kansas and Oklahoma. Human cases of B. turicatae in Florida (potentially transmitted by O. turicata americanus) have not been reported (Dworkin et al., 2008). In California, Borrelia parkeri was documented as the causative agent of TBRF in a single human patient in 1939, and has since been detected in Ornithodoros parkeri collected within the state; the true medical importance of this spirochete remains unclear (Dworkin et al., 2008; Barbour and Miller, 2014).

Conclusions

Tick species in North America are diverse in ecology, host-seeking behavior, and pathogens they transmit. Ticks are also dynamic and adaptable, as demonstrated by their changing geographic distributions and establishment in new areas. Factors promoting this expansion include anthropogenic disturbances of terrain, climate change, movement of livestock, translocation via migratory bird hosts, and increases in wildlife populations, particularly white-tailed deer. Here we summarized the current geographic distribution, feeding habits and preferences, and known or novel pathogen transmission patterns for important tick species feeding on dogs and cats in North America. The wildlife-associated ixodid ticks of North America, including A. americanum (lone star tick), A. maculatum (Gulf Coast tick), D. variabilis (American dog tick), I. scapularis (black-legged tick, deer tick), I. pacificus (western black-legged tick), and now H. longicornis (longhorned tick), continue to extend beyond their historic geographic ranges. The domestic dog dependent Rhipicephalus spp. (brown dog ticks) are now documented to occasionally feed on cats and humans. The argasid O. megnini (spinose ear tick), once limited to the southwestern United States, is now found internationally due to movement of infested livestock. Ornithodoros spp. vector relapsing fever in humans, a zoonotic infection now considered emerging in dogs.

As humans continue to encroach into natural tick habitats, modify landscape, and transport livestock and companion animals long distances, tick species will adapt accordingly and extend into new areas. It is critical to continually reassess where tick species occur and evaluate associated pathogen endemicity. Regular surveillance and geospatial predictive mapping efforts investigating changing tick populations in North America are important to protect the health of pets and owners alike. Understanding the basic biology, life history, distribution, and pathogen transmission systems of the common ticks of dogs and cats in this region is vitally important to successfully address the health challenges ticks create.