Literature DB >> 33970738

Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of abemaciclib for the treatment of HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer.

Gebra Cuyun Carter1, Kristin M Sheffield1, Anala Gossai2, Yu-Jing Huang1, Yajun Emily Zhu1, Lee Bowman1, Emily Nash Smyth1, Raina Mathur2, Aaron B Cohen2,3, Erik Rasmussen2, Shreya Balakrishna2, Claudia Morato Guimaraes1, Sarah Rybowski1, Andrew D Seidman4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective observational study described baseline characteristics, real-world treatment patterns, and outcomes among patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with abemaciclib in the United States.
METHODS: De-identified electronic health record-derived data were used to describe patients who began abemaciclib treatment on or after 30 June 2016 and ≥4 months before data cutoff (31 December 2018). Real-world response (rwR) and real-world progression assessments were abstracted from clinical documentation. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate the real-world best response. The Kaplan-Meier method estimated real-world time to first response (rwTTFR) and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS).
RESULTS: The median age of 118 female patients at abemaciclib initiation was 66.5 years (interquartile range, 57.0, 73.0). The breakdown of patients who received abemaciclib in first, second, third, or later lines was 28.8%, 21.2%, 20.3%, and 29.7%, respectively. Patients received abemaciclib as monotherapy (12.7%) or in combination with endocrine therapy: fulvestrant (59.3%); aromatase inhibitor (22.9%); aromatase inhibitor and fulvestrant (5.1%). There were 68 patients (57.6%) with ≥1 rwR assessment: 41.2% with a real-world complete response or real-world partial response. Median rwTTFR was 3.6 months (95% confidence interval, 3.5, 5.2). Twelve-month rwPFS probability was 61.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: This study represents utilization and outcomes associated with abemaciclib approximately 1 year following FDA approval. Treatment patterns demonstrated heterogeneity and, as in clinical trials, patients appeared to benefit from abemaciclib treatment in the real world. More research investigating outcomes associated with abemaciclib treatment is needed, with larger samples and longer follow-up to enable closer evaluation by subgroup, regimen, and line of therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abemaciclib; CDK4/CDK6 inhibitor; breast cancer; metastatic breast cancer; real-world utilization

Year:  2021        PMID: 33970738     DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1923468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  2 in total

1.  Real-World Patient Characteristics, Utilization Patterns, and Outcomes of US Patients with HR+, HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated with Abemaciclib.

Authors:  Emily Nash Smyth; Julie Beyrer; Kimberly R Saverno; Elizabeth Hadden; Hamed Abedtash; Angelo DeLuca; Garreth W Lawrence; Sarah Rybowski
Journal:  Drugs Real World Outcomes       Date:  2022-09-12

2.  Real-World Tumor Response of Palbociclib Plus Letrozole Versus Letrozole for Metastatic Breast Cancer in US Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Adam Brufsky; Xianchen Liu; Benjamin Li; Lynn McRoy; Rachel M Layman
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 4.493

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.