Literature DB >> 33970464

Biennial Analysis of Medication Guide Length and Estimated Readability for New Molecular Entity Drugs, 2011-2017.

Paul R Jones1, Elisabeth J Walther2, Andrew Nguyen2, Jonas Santiago2, Bryon M Pearsall2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A medication guide (MG) is a form of FDA-approved labeling that provides patients with information about certain prescribed drugs so that patients can use these drugs safely and effectively. Given ongoing efforts by FDA and industry to continuously improve MG content and format, we hypothesized that more recently approved MGs for new molecular entities (NMEs) would be shorter and more readable compared to NME MGs approved earlier.
METHODS: We analyzed 53 NME MGs that were either approved in 2011 (n = 16), 2013 (n = 9), 2015 (n = 12), or 2017 (n = 16) to determine whether MG page length, word count, and readability scores differed by year. Readability was estimated by Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Fry graph (FRY), and Gunning's Fog Index (FOG) scores.
RESULTS: Mean page length was significantly lower in 2017 than in 2011 and 2013 (ps < .0001). Mean FKGL scores reflected sentences and words found in 8th grade textbooks, but mean FOG and FRY scores were consistent with sentences and words found in 10th and 11th grade textbooks.
CONCLUSIONS: Although more recent NME MGs were shorter than older NME MGs, additional research is warranted to determine whether shorter MGs lead to improved readability. Developers choosing to estimate MG readability with equations should consider using multiple readability formulas and weigh the strengths and weaknesses of this approach. Using validated tools to more comprehensively assess MG readability should also be considered.
© 2021. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FDA; Health literacy; Medication guide; Prescription drugs; Readability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33970464      PMCID: PMC8338801          DOI: 10.1007/s43441-021-00270-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci        ISSN: 2168-4790            Impact factor:   1.337


  10 in total

1.  Readability of patient information leaflets on antiepileptic drugs in the UK.

Authors:  I C Wong
Journal:  Seizure       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.184

Review 2.  Assessing readability of patient education materials: current role in orthopaedics.

Authors:  Sameer Badarudeen; Sanjeev Sabharwal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Differences in perceived difficulty in print and online patient education materials.

Authors:  Michael Farnsworth
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2014

4.  A new readability yardstick.

Authors:  R FLESCH
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1948-06

5.  Preferences for patient medication information: what do patients want?

Authors:  Julia Kish-Doto; Monica Scales; Paula Eguino-Medina; Tania Fitzgerald; Janice P Tzeng; Lauren A McCormack; Amie O'Donoghue; Oluwamurewa Oguntimein; Suzanne L West
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2014

6.  A critical review of FDA-approved Medication Guides.

Authors:  Michael S Wolf; Terry C Davis; William H Shrank; Marolee Neuberger; Ruth M Parker
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-08-01

7.  Evaluation of written prescription information provided in community pharmacies: a study in eight states.

Authors:  Bonnie L Svarstad; Dara C Bultman; Jeanine K Mount; Ellen R Tabak
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2003 May-Jun

Review 8.  Designing effective written health education materials: considerations for health professionals.

Authors:  Tammy Hoffmann; Linda Worrall
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 3.033

9.  Usability of FDA-approved medication guides.

Authors:  Michael S Wolf; Jennifer King; Elizabeth A H Wilson; Laura M Curtis; Stacy Cooper Bailey; James Duhig; Allison Russell; Ashley Bergeron; Amanda Daly; Ruth M Parker; Terry C Davis; William H Shrank; Bruce Lambert
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Consumers Better Understand and Prefer Simplified Written Drug Information: An Evaluation of 2 Novel Formats Versus the Current CMI.

Authors:  Julie Aker; Melissa Beck; Julie I Papay; Tom Cantu; Melissa Ellis; Dan Keravich; Kristen Bibeau
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.778

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.