Literature DB >> 3396963

Reproducibility of ambulatory oesophageal pH monitoring.

F Johnsson1, B Joelsson.   

Abstract

To evaluate the reproducibility of ambulatory 24 hour intraoesophageal pH monitoring, 20 patients were randomly selected to undergo two consecutive investigations. Fifteen patients were classified as either abnormal, or normal on both test days. The amount of acid reflux, expressed as percentage of time with oesophageal pH below 4.0 during the two 24 hour periods, showed 77% concordance. The upright and recumbent periods of measurement showed different degrees of concordance: 83% and 62%, respectively. The reproducibility during time periods of different length was found to increase with increasing length of day time pH recording. A 16 hour period during evening and night had a reproducibility of only 58%, however. It is concluded that there is fairly good reproducibility when measuring gastro-oesophageal reflux over 24 hours, but that the reproducibility is poorer at night, during the postprandial period and when daytime monitoring is shorter than 10 hours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3396963      PMCID: PMC1433777          DOI: 10.1136/gut.29.7.886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  17 in total

1.  Continuous oesophageal pH recording and acid-clearing test. A study of reproducibility.

Authors:  S Boesby
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 2.423

2.  Alginate-antacid in the reduction of gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Authors:  C Stanciu; J R Bennett
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1974-01-26       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  A frequency-duration index (FDI) for the evaluation of ambulatory recordings of gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Authors:  F J Branicki; D F Evans; J A Jones; A L Ogilvie; M Atkinson; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Ambulatory 24 hour intraesophageal pH-monitoring in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  F Johnsson; B Joelsson; P E Isberg
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Esophageal intraluminal pH recording in the assessment of gastroesophageal reflux and its consequences.

Authors:  M Atkinson; A Van Gelder
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1977-04

6.  Correlation between manometric and pH tests for gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Authors:  C Stanciu; R C Hoare; J R Bennett
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Patterns of gastroesophageal reflux in health and disease.

Authors:  T R Demeester; L F Johnson; G J Joseph; M S Toscano; A W Hall; D B Skinner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Cimetidine in gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Authors:  J R Bennett; G Buckton; H D Martin
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.216

9.  Interdigestive phasic contractions of the human lower esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  J Dent; W J Dodds; T Sekiguchi; W J Hogan; R C Arndorfer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Ambulatory monitoring of oesophageal pH in reflux oesophagitis using a portable radiotelemetry system.

Authors:  F J Branicki; D F Evans; A L Ogilvie; M Atkinson; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  38 in total

1.  An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management--the Genval Workshop Report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Esophageal histology does not provide additional useful information over clinical assessment in identifying reflux patients presenting for esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Authors:  S Nandurkar; N J Talley; C J Martin; T Ng; S Adams
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Reproducibility of 24 hour oesophageal pH studies in infants.

Authors:  F J Hampton; U M MacFadyen; H Simpson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  What is a normal upper gastrointestinal tract?

Authors:  D G Colin-Jones; P L Golding
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-03-30

5.  Capsule pH monitoring: is wireless more?

Authors:  R H Holloway
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  Symptom association analysis in ambulatory gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring.

Authors:  A J Bredenoord; B L A M Weusten; A J P M Smout
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Variations in results of simultaneous ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring.

Authors:  F J Hampton; U M MacFadyen; J F Mayberry
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Acid reflux event detection using the Bravo wireless versus the Slimline catheter pH systems: why are the numbers so different?

Authors:  J E Pandolfino; Q Zhang; M A Schreiner; S Ghosh; M P Roth; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-05-28       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 9.  [Correct diagnosis for indication in gastroesophageal reflux disease].

Authors:  A H Hölscher; E Bollschweiler; Ch Gutschow; P Malfertheiner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 10.  Diagnosis of reflux disease.

Authors:  N I McDougall
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1996 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.