Anders Batman Mjelle1,2, Anesa Mulabecirovic1, Edda Jonina Olafsdottir2, Odd Helge Gilja1,3,4, Roald Flesland Havre2,3,4, Mette Vesterhus5,6. 1. Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. 2. Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. 3. Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. 4. National Centre for Ultrasound in Gastroenterology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. 5. Department of Medicine, Haraldsplass Diakonale Sykehus AS, Bergen, Norway. 6. Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has a high impact on the global health
burden, with a prevalence of 25%
1
. Although
commonly associated with obese adults, it is the most prevalent liver disease in
children
2
. Even in lean adolescents, the prevalence
is estimated to be 8%
3
. In adults,
non-obese and lean NAFLD is associated with increased mortality
4
.The criterion standard for diagnosis of NAFLD is liver biopsy. It is often performed
in children to stage the severity and to eliminate other liver diseases
2
, but its use is more limited in adults
5
. NAFLD can potentially cause fibrosis and cirrhosis,
and ultimately chronic liver failure necessitating liver transplantation. Thus,
noninvasive monitoring is warranted. Conventional ultrasound (US) examination is
applied in both diagnosis and follow-up, with a global sensitivity and specificity
of 0.85 and 0.94, respectively, but it is not recommended due to poor performance in
cases of mild steatosis (i. e., involving 5–33% of
hepatocytes)
2
5
6
.Ultrasound attenuates as the US waves penetrate tissue. To compensate for this, the
time-gain compensation function is used to amplify reflections from deeper locations
to obtain a more even B-mode image. The attenuation increases with increasing fat
content in the liver tissue. The measurement of attenuation at different scanning
depths and in different organs, e. g., using the hepato-renal index for
assessing fatty liver in NAFLD patients, has been described and used to identify and
quantify liver steatosis
7
.The controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), implemented in the Fibroscan®
system, uses this attenuation within liver tissue to calculate the CAP,
simultaneously measuring liver stiffness. CAP has been shown to correlate with the
histopathological degree of liver steatosis in adults
8
9
and children
10
, with a pooled sensitivity and specificity for mild steatosis of 0.87
and 0.91, respectively
11
. On this basis, adult
guidelines suggest that CAP is a promising tool but state that there is a need for
more information
5
. Different cutoff values have
been suggested for the diagnosis of NAFLD: for adults 248 dB/m
9
and in children 225 dB/m
10
. Reliability criteria for CAP measurements are not
established, but both the interquartile range (IQR) (e. g.,
< 0.4) and IQR divided by the median (IQR/M) (e. g.,
< 0.1, < 0.2, or < 0.3) have been
proposed
12
13
.There is a lack of studies in pediatric and combined adult and pediatric populations,
particularly in subjects without obesity or suspected liver disease. We aimed to
explore CAP in healthy non-obesechildren and adults to establish normal CAP values,
with simultaneous examination with B-mode ultrasound and liver stiffness
measurements. The study was part of a previously published project aiming to
establish reference LSM values for children and adults
14
15
.
Materials and Methods
Subjects
The study was performed at a single university hospital from August 2017 to
January 2018. We prospectively recruited children aged 8–17 years and
adults aged 25–70 years. All examinations were performed by one of two
operators experienced in liver stiffness measurements and certified Fibroscan
users. Inclusion criteria consisted of valid CAP and LSM using Fibroscan, no
history of liver disease or any chronic disease with the potential of affecting
the liver, and lack of obesity defined as an international obesity task force
(IOTF) grade 2. A total of 87 children and 100 adults were recruited. Height,
weight, waist circumference, and body mass index (BMI) were recorded and
converted into z-scores (standard score; standard deviations below or above the
mean). BMI z-score was used in analyses in children and in the entire cohort,
while BMI was used in analyses with adults. Blood was drawn for liver
biochemistry analyses in all adults but not in children. Fatty liver index,
non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) fibrosis scores, and Fib-4, a commonly
used noninvasive liver fibrosis score, were calculated for all adults using
published algorithms
16
17
18
. Subjects with abnormal liver
function tests or B-mode signs of steatosis or splenomegaly were excluded.
B-mode ultrasound evaluation
All participants underwent B-mode ultrasound evaluation using a standardized
protocol, including evaluation of the liver, gall bladder, spleen, and kidneys
prior to elastography and CAP measurements. The distance between the skin and
the liver capsule was recorded.
Liver stiffness measurements (LSM)
Elastography and CAP measurements were performed according to the protocol, with
subjects in a supine position with the right hand resting under their head,
after ≥3 hours of fasting. All participants were examined using
transient elastography (TE, Fibroscan with an M-probe), point shear wave
elastography (pSWE; in Samsung RS80A with the CA1–7A convex array
probe), and two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE; in children: GE
Logiq E9, in adults: GE Logiq S8; both with the C1–6 convex array
probe). A valid LSM was defined as the median value of 10 acquisitions, given an
interquartile range divided by the median (IQR/M) of
≤30%. CAP values were accepted if the LSM by Fibroscan
measurement was considered valid.
Controlled attenuation parameter
Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) was reported in dB/m, using the
median of 10 acquisitions. The interquartile range (IQR) was registered for all
measurements.
Statistical analysis
We used SPSS version 25 (SPSS Inc, 2016, Armonk, NY) for all analyses. All
variables were tested for normality before presenting data as either
mean±standard deviation (SD) or median (range), as appropriate. For
comparison of groups, standard paired T-test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, or
Pearson Chi-Square test was used as appropriate. Correlations were tested by
Pearsoncorrelation coefficient. The upper limit of normal (ULN) value was defined as
mean+1.64 SD unless otherwise specified. P values <0.05 were
considered significant.
Ethical aspects
The study was in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the
Regional Committee on Medical and Health Research Ethics.
Results
A total of 176 subjects were included for final analyses (82 children aged
8–17 years [31 males; 37.8%], 94 adults aged 25–70 years [46
males; 48.9%]). Reasons for exclusion were steatosis on B-mode ultrasound in
adults (n=6) and either failure to obtain valid measurements (n=3)
or obesity (n=2) in the case of children. Background characteristics are
shown in
Table 1
.
Table 1
Background characteristics of patients undergoing
ultrasound elastography and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP)
measurements.
Total panel
Children
Adults
Number
176
82
94
Males, number (%)
77 (43.8)
31 (37.8)
46 (48.9)
Age, median (range)
26 (8–69)
13.3 (8.4–17.9)
42.5 (25–69)
Body mass index z-score, mean (SD)
0.2 (0.9)
−0.1 (1.0)
0.4 (0.7)
Overweight subjects (IOTF=1), n (%)
35 (19.9)
5 (6.1)
30 (31.9)
Overweight subjects according to BMI z-score, n (%)
Table 1
Background characteristics of patients undergoing
ultrasound elastography and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP)
measurements.* TE = transient elastography; pSWE = point shear
wave elastography; 2D-SWE = two-dimensional shear wave elastography;
kPa = kilopascals; IOTF (International Obesity Task Force); Fib-4
= Fibrosis-4 index; NAFLD = nonalcoholic fatty liver
disease.
Overall results
In the total population, the mean CAP was 208±44.1 dB/m (range
100–348).CAP values increased with age. Dividing participants into children, young adults
(<39.9 years), and adults (40–70 years), the mean values were
191, 210, and 232, respectively (p-values 0.018, 0.018, and <0.001,
respectively, for comparisons between consecutive age groups). In linear
regression, CAP was associated with age, BMI z-score, skin-to-capsule distance,
and sex (p-values 0.049, 0.011, 0.011, and 0.049, respectively) (
Fig. 1
). CAP was significantly correlated with
BMI z-score in children (rho 0.27, p=0.014) and adults (rho 0.54,
p<0.001). This difference in the degree of correlation reflects a
steeper rise in adults than children (
Fig. 2
).
CAP values were not affected by LSM by either TE, 2D-SWE, or pSWE.
Fig. 1
Body mass index z-score versus controlled attenuation
parameter for all participants, aged 8–70 years. Rho 0.45
(p<0.001).
Fig. 2
Body mass index z-score versus controlled attenuation
parameter for all participants, with children in blue and adults in red,
with fit lines for both subgroups.
Body mass index z-score versus controlled attenuation
parameter for all participants, aged 8–70 years. Rho 0.45
(p<0.001).Body mass index z-score versus controlled attenuation
parameter for all participants, with children in blue and adults in red,
with fit lines for both subgroups.Regarding quality criteria, the overall CAP interquartile range (IQR) was
41±23 (range 7–225). We found that 53% of values were
within the proposed quality criteria of IQR <40, while 19, 55 and
81% had an IQR/M value less than 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3,
respectively. IQR exerted no effect on CAP value. IQR was not affected by CAP,
LSM (or LSM IQR/M) by any system, sex, or age.
CAP in children
In children aged 8–17 years, the mean CAP was 191±38
dB/m (range 100–296 dB/m), and 82% and
94% of subjects had CAP results within the normal range as defined
by the published cutoff value <225 for children and <248
dB/m for adults, respectively. ULN calculation yielded a cutoff
value of 253 dB/m. The only significant factors affecting CAP in
children were the BMI z-score (
Table 3
) and
waist circumference z-score (p-values 0.01 and 0.011, respectively). The
skin to capsule distance was not associated with CAP. The CAP value was
found to rise with BMI z-score, starting at a BMI z-score between –1
and 0 (
Fig. 3
). Using the published cutoff
value of 225 dB/m, BMI z-scores were not significantly higher in the
high compared to the low CAP group (mean value +0.34 vs.
–0.2 p=0.051).
Fig. 3
Body mass index z-score versus controlled attenuation
parameter (CAP) for children aged 8–17 years. Rho 0.27
(p=0.014). The vertical line (z-score –1) reflects
where a rise in CAP values begins. Above the –1 reference
line, there is a highly significant relationship between CAP and BMI
z-score (rho 0.36, p=0.002) while there is no such
relationship for those below –1 (rho -0.04,
p=0.88).
Body mass index z-score versus controlled attenuation
parameter (CAP) for children aged 8–17 years. Rho 0.27
(p=0.014). The vertical line (z-score –1) reflects
where a rise in CAP values begins. Above the –1 reference
line, there is a highly significant relationship between CAP and BMI
z-score (rho 0.36, p=0.002) while there is no such
relationship for those below –1 (rho -0.04,
p=0.88).CAP IQR was 44.6±20 (range 10–101). We found that 45%
had an IQR <40, while 9, 44 and 72% had an IQR/M
value less than 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3, respectively.Trying to establish an upper limit of normal (ULN) for these quality criteria
in our presumably healthy, non-obesechildren using the lowest 90%
of values, the IQR and IQR/M cutoff values would be <69 and
IQR/M <0.4, respectively.
CAP in adults
In adults, the mean CAP was 223±44 dB/m (range
100–348), and 56% and 77% of subjects had CAP
results within the normal range as defined by the published cutoff value
<225 for children and <248 dB/m for adults,
respectively. ULN calculation yielded a cutoff value of 295 dB/m.
CAP correlated with age, sex, BMI (
Fig. 4
),
waist circumference, and skin to capsule distance (
Table 2
). However, the skin-to-capsule distance was the only
factor showing independent association to CAP in linear regression
(p=0.005).
Fig. 4
Controlled attenuation parameter (dB/m) versus
BMI for adults, demonstrating a significant relationship (rho 0.574,
p<0.001).
Table 2
Correlation between CAP and clinical features
and laboratory values for adults.
Controlled attenuation parameter (dB/m) versus
BMI for adults, demonstrating a significant relationship (rho 0.574,
p<0.001).Table 2
Correlation between CAP and clinical features
and laboratory values for adults.BMI: body mass index; GGT: gamma-glutamyl transferase; NAFLD:
non-alcoholic fatty liver index; ALT: alanine transaminase; FIB-4:
Fibrosis-4; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density
lipoprotein.The mean CAP values for men and women were 235±45 and 210±40,
respectively. Adults with CAP >248 dB/m had a significantly
higher BMI compared to those with a lower CAP (mean value 25.8 vs. 23.1,
p<0.001).CAP values were highly correlated with the fatty liver index (rho 0.55,
p<0.001) (
Figs. 5
and
6
) and correlated with the NAFLD fibrosis
score (rho 0.21, p=0.046). CAP was not correlated with Fib-4 or ALT
(
Table 2
). The percentage of subjects
with low, indeterminate, or high-risk values for different indexes are shown
in
Table 1
, based on published values
16
17
19
20
.
Fig. 5
Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) is significantly
correlated with the fatty liver index in adults (rho 0.55,
p<0.001).
Fig. 6
Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) for low,
moderate, and high fatty liver index (FLI). FLI: <30 (ruled
out); 30–59 (indeterminate); ≥60 (ruled in).
Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) is significantly
correlated with the fatty liver index in adults (rho 0.55,
p<0.001).Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) for low,
moderate, and high fatty liver index (FLI). FLI: <30 (ruled
out); 30–59 (indeterminate); ≥60 (ruled in).Interquartile range (IQR) was 37.6 (25), with a range of 7–225. We
found that 61% had an IQR <40, while 28, 64, and 89%
had an IQR/M value less than 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3, respectively.Using the lowest 90% of values to establish a ULN in adults, the IQR
and IQR/M cutoff values would be <57 and <0.3,
respectively.
Discussion
This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first study reporting CAP values in
healthy non-obesechildren and adults of all ages. Previous studies in adults have
shown that a raised CAP is often found in apparently healthy individuals without
evident steatosis upon ultrasound examination
21
.
Our study is the first to describe that CAP increases with increasing BMI z-score
even in healthy subjects with a BMI z-score
below
zero (corresponding to a
BMI <22 in adults). In line with our findings, an association between CAP
and BMI has previously been shown in adults, with an estimated rise of 4.4
dB/m per BMI unit. However, whether this is valid for the entire BMI specter
or only for a specific interval remains uncertain
9
22
. In contrast, a biopsy-controlled
study including children and young adults up to 24 years of age reported a higher
BMI in subjects with steatosis than those without steatosis while displaying no
significant association between BMI and CAP. All subjects with proven steatosis had
a BMI z-score >1.0
10
.In children, we found that 18.3% had a CAP above the suggested cutoff value
of 225 dB/m. Only five children (6.1%) were above the suggested
adult cutoff value of 248 dB/m; all of them were normal weight, with BMI
z-scores ranging from –1.7 to +1.2. In our study, all but one of the
children with a CAP >248 dB/m had BMI z-scores ≤1.0,
suggesting that steatosis was less likely based on the aforementioned
biopsy-controlled study
10
. NAFLD may occur in
non-overweight individuals, so-called “lean” NAFLD. A study with
1482 adolescents (12–18 years) with a BMI below the 85
th
percentile (corresponding to a BMI z-score less than +1) found that
8% had suspected NAFLD, but with no difference in BMI z-score between those
with and without suspected NAFLD
3
. Similar or
higher incidence rates have been firmly established in lean adults, even in
biopsy-proven studies
23
24
25
26
.
To our knowledge, there are no reports specifically investigating CAP in individuals
with a below-average BMI.The rise in CAP across BMI z-scores was steeper in adults than children. Given an
identical increase in BMI in children and adults, adults showed a more substantial
CAP increase (
Fig. 2
).In adults, CAP was correlated with all anthropometric values indicating obesity: BMI,
waist circumference, and skin-to-capsule distance (
Table
2
). These parameters were highly correlated and challenging to use as
independent variables. Interestingly, in linear regression, the only factor
independently associated with CAP in adults was the skin-to-liver capsule distance,
indicating that this measure of subcutaneous fat tissue is more closely associated
with steatosis than BMI. BMI is considered a rather reliable predictor of body fat,
but obesity may be either overestimated or underestimated based on the amount of
muscle tissue, and a high BMI does not necessarily indicate obesity or a high degree
of body fat
27
. However, although easy to obtain,
skin-to-capsule distance requires ultrasound, making BMI more available for
clinicians without ultrasound access.Our finding of a high degree of correlation between CAP and the fatty liver index
confirms previous results
28
. There was a small but
significant correlation with NAFLD fibrosis score and no correlation with Fib-4.
There are several reasons why it is difficult to compare a new parameter with these
index scores: Both Fib-4 and the NAFLD fibrosis score have been shown to have
unacceptable diagnostic accuracy among non-obese individuals as well as in subjects
aged ≤35 or >65 years, making them difficult to interpret in our
material
29
30
. That
being said, they both perform best when used to rule out, not rule in, advanced
fibrosis, and none of our subjects were above the upper cutoff value, where an
excellent specificity has been demonstrated
31
.Table 3
Correlation between CAP and clinical features for
children.CAP correlated with age in adults but not in children. In linear regression, we found
that the increasing CAP values during adulthood only reflected the increasing
prevalence of obesity with age. CAP values were higher in adults than in children.
This difference persisted after correction for the increased BMI in adulthood,
suggesting that CAP increase may be a phenomenon linked to the transition into
adulthood, as there was no significant effect of age within the two individual
cohorts. This is in contrast to liver stiffness measurements, where an age effect is
often found in children
15
.The use of quality criteria is heavily advocated in liver stiffness measurements,
particularly the use of IQR/M. There is no consensus on the use of similar
criteria in CAP measurements. However, it was reported that IQR seems to be
independent of CAP values and that an IQR <40 increases the diagnostic
accuracy of CAP
12
. Other authors have not been able
to reproduce this while arguing that a low IQR/M for CAP significantly
increases the accuracy of diagnosing steatosis
13
,
with several suggested cutoff values: <0.1, <0.2, and
<0.3.In our study, we observe that a substantial number of subjects do not meet the
proposed quality criteria, with an IQR <40 in 45% and 61%,
and an IQR/M <0.1 in 9% and 28%, in children and
adults, respectively.Our findings support a lack of correlation between CAP and IQR value, meaning that
measurement variation is similar for a range of CAP values. Thus, with a stable IQR
value across CAP values, the IQR/M will decrease when the CAP increases. In
our cohort of healthy individuals, it is impossible to evaluate the effect of IQR or
IQR/M on diagnostic accuracy.Although already obviously useful, CAP will hopefully continue to improve, with
promising modifications, such as continuous CAP, in the pipeline
32
.
Limitations
The major limitation is the lack of liver biopsies or magnetic resonance
imaging-based fat fraction quantification (MRI-PDFF), making us unable to rule
out liver steatosis with certainty. We tried to combat this by excluding obese
individuals and performing B-mode ultrasound to rule out increased liver
echogenicity. We performed blood tests to exclude other liver diseases in
adults, but it was deemed unethical in healthy children.
Conclusion
CAP is highly correlated to BMI z-score across all ages, even in subjects with a BMI
below average (z-score <0). Skin-to-capsule distance in adults is a stronger
predictor of increased CAP compared to BMI. Approximately 1 in 5 healthy, non-obese
subjects had a CAP value above the suggested cutoffs for liver steatosis, warranting
further research to clarify whether this should lead to an adjustment of reference
values. Using our results, CAP ULN would be increased from 225 and 248 to 253 and
295 in children and adults, respectively.
Table 3
Correlation between CAP and clinical features for
children.
Authors: Naga Chalasani; Zobair Younossi; Joel E Lavine; Michael Charlton; Kenneth Cusi; Mary Rinella; Stephen A Harrison; Elizabeth M Brunt; Arun J Sanyal Journal: Hepatology Date: 2017-09-29 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Thomas Karlas; David Petroff; Magali Sasso; Jian-Gao Fan; Yu-Qiang Mi; Victor de Lédinghen; Manoj Kumar; Monica Lupsor-Platon; Kwang-Hyub Han; Ana C Cardoso; Giovanna Ferraioli; Wah-Kheong Chan; Vincent Wai-Sun Wong; Robert P Myers; Kazuaki Chayama; Mireen Friedrich-Rust; Michel Beaugrand; Feng Shen; Jean-Baptiste Hiriart; Shiv K Sarin; Radu Badea; Kyu Sik Jung; Patrick Marcellin; Carlo Filice; Sanjiv Mahadeva; Grace Lai-Hung Wong; Pam Crotty; Keiichi Masaki; Joerg Bojunga; Pierre Bedossa; Volker Keim; Johannes Wiegand Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2016-12-28 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Paul Angulo; Elisabetta Bugianesi; Einar S Bjornsson; Phunchai Charatcharoenwitthaya; Peter R Mills; Francisco Barrera; Svanhildur Haflidadottir; Christopher P Day; Jacob George Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2013-07-13 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Paul Angulo; Jason M Hui; Giulio Marchesini; Ellisabetta Bugianesi; Jacob George; Geoffrey C Farrell; Felicity Enders; Sushma Saksena; Alastair D Burt; John P Bida; Keith Lindor; Schuyler O Sanderson; Marco Lenzi; Leon A Adams; James Kench; Terry M Therneau; Christopher P Day Journal: Hepatology Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Georg Semmler; Katharina Wöran; Bernhard Scheiner; Lukas Walter Unger; Rafael Paternostro; Judith Stift; Philipp Schwabl; Theresa Bucsics; David Bauer; Benedikt Simbrunner; Albert Friedrich Stättermayer; Matthias Pinter; Michael Trauner; Thomas Reiberger; Mattias Mandorfer Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2020-01-17 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Lukas Denkmayr; Alexandra Feldman; Lars Stechemesser; Sebastian K Eder; Stephan Zandanell; Michael Schranz; Michael Strasser; Ursula Huber-Schönauer; Stephan Buch; Jochen Hampe; Bernhard Paulweber; Carolin Lackner; Heike Haufe; Karl Sotlar; Christian Datz; Elmar Aigner Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2018-12-17 Impact factor: 4.241