Literature DB >> 33969113

Development of Donor Recipient Chimeric Cells of bone marrow origin as a novel approach for tolerance induction in transplantation.

Joanna Cwykiel1,2, Maria Madajka-Niemeyer2, Maria Siemionow1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cell therapies and chimerism-based strategies are currently the most successful approach for tolerance induction in transplantation. This study aimed to establish and characterize novel Donor Recipient Chimeric Ccell (DRCC) therapy of bone marrow (BM) origin presenting donor-recipient phenotype to support tolerance induction.
METHODS: Ex vivo fusions of fully MHC-mismatched BM cells from ACI (RT1a) and Lewis (RT1l) rats were performed using polyethylene-glycol (PEG). The creation of rat DRCC was tested by flow cytometry (FC), confocal microscopy and PCR. FC characterized DRCC's phenotype (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD45, CD90, CD11b/c, CD45RA, OX-82, or CD4/CD25) and apoptosis, while mixed lymphocyte reaction assessed DRCC's immunogenicity and colony forming unit assay tested DRCC's differentiation and proliferation. DRCC's polyploidy was evaluated using Hoechst33342 staining and COMET assay tested genotoxicity of fusion procedure. ELISA analyzed the secretion of IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, TGFß1, IFNγ and TNFα by DRCC at day 1, 5 and 14 post-fusion. The DRCC's phenotype after long-term culturing was assessed by reverse-transcription PCR.
RESULTS: The chimeric state of DRCC was confirmed. Fusion did not change the expression of hematopoietic markers compared to BM controls. Although an increased number of early and late apoptotic (Annexin V+/Sytox blue- and Annexin V+/Sytox blue+, respectively) DRCC was detected at 24h post-fusion, the number significantly decreased at day 5 (38.4%±3.1% and 22.6%±2.5%, vs. 28.3%±2.5% and 13.9%±2.6%, respectively, P<0.05). DRCC presented decreased immunogenicity, increased expression of IL-10 and TGFβ1 and proliferative potential comparable to BM controls. The average percentage of tetraploid DRCC was 3.1%±0.2% compared to 0.96%±0.1% in BM controls. The lack of damage to the DRCC's DNA content supported the DRCC's safety. In culture, DRCC maintained proliferation for up to 28 days while preserving hematopoietic profile.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed feasibility of DRCC creation via ex vivo PEG mediated fusion. The created DRCC revealed pro-tolerogenic properties indicating potential immunomodulatory effect of DRCC therapy when applied in vivo to support tolerance induction in solid organ and vascularized composite allograft transplantation. 2021 Stem Cell Investigation. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Donor recipient chimeric cell (DRCC); cell fusion; cell therapy; immunomodulation; transplantation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33969113      PMCID: PMC8100823          DOI: 10.21037/sci-2020-044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cell Investig        ISSN: 2306-9759


  71 in total

1.  Biological progression from adult bone marrow to mononucleate muscle stem cell to multinucleate muscle fiber in response to injury.

Authors:  Mark A LaBarge; Helen M Blau
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. 1975.

Authors:  G Köhler; C Milstein
Journal:  Biotechnology       Date:  1992

Review 3.  Intercellular exchanges of membrane patches (trogocytosis) highlight the next level of immune plasticity.

Authors:  Julien Caumartin; Joel Lemaoult; Edgardo D Carosella
Journal:  Transpl Immunol       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 1.708

4.  In vitro measurement of cell death with the annexin A5 affinity assay.

Authors:  Hugo van Genderen; Heidi Kenis; Petra Lux; Lisette Ungeth; Cecile Maassen; Niko Deckers; Jagat Narula; Leo Hofstra; Chris Reutelingsperger
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 5.  Stem cell factor as a survival and growth factor in human normal and malignant hematopoiesis.

Authors:  H T Hassan; A Zander
Journal:  Acta Haematol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.195

6.  Cardiac Stem Cell Hybrids Enhance Myocardial Repair.

Authors:  Pearl Quijada; Hazel T Salunga; Nirmala Hariharan; Jonathan D Cubillo; Farid G El-Sayed; Maryam Moshref; Kristin M Bala; Jacqueline M Emathinger; Andrea De La Torre; Lucia Ormachea; Roberto Alvarez; Natalie A Gude; Mark A Sussman
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 17.367

7.  Extensive fusion of haematopoietic cells with Purkinje neurons in response to chronic inflammation.

Authors:  Clas B Johansson; Sawsan Youssef; Kassie Koleckar; Colin Holbrook; Regis Doyonnas; Stephane Y Corbel; Lawrence Steinman; Fabio M V Rossi; Helen M Blau
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 8.  Tissue Regeneration in the Chronically Inflamed Tumor Environment: Implications for Cell Fusion Driven Tumor Progression and Therapy Resistant Tumor Hybrid Cells.

Authors:  Thomas Dittmar; Kurt S Zänker
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Fusion between hematopoietic and epithelial cells in adult human intestine.

Authors:  Alain D Silk; Charles E Gast; Paige S Davies; Farnaz D Fakhari; Gretchen E Vanderbeek; Motomi Mori; Melissa H Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Interleukin 10 (IL-10) inhibits human lymphocyte interferon gamma-production by suppressing natural killer cell stimulatory factor/IL-12 synthesis in accessory cells.

Authors:  A D'Andrea; M Aste-Amezaga; N M Valiante; X Ma; M Kubin; G Trinchieri
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1993-09-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  1 in total

1.  Donor Recipient Chimeric Cells Induce Chimerism and Extend Survival of Vascularized Composite Allografts.

Authors:  Joanna Cwykiel; Arkadiusz Jundzill; Aleksandra Klimczak; Maria Madajka-Niemeyer; Maria Siemionow
Journal:  Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz)       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.291

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.