| Literature DB >> 33969082 |
Abstract
The outbreak of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has resulted in a global public health emergency. Patients with cirrhosis were deemed more susceptible to viral infection because of their dysregulated immune response. Similar to the general population, cirrhotic patients exhibit various degrees of COVID-19-related liver injury, which could be attributed to direct virus cytotoxicity, systemic immune system activation, drug-related liver injury, reactivation of pre-existing liver disease, and hypoxic hepatitis. The clinical symptoms in patients with cirrhosis and COVID-19 were similar to those in the general population with COVID-19, with a lower proportion of patients with gastrointestinal symptoms. Although respiratory failure is the predominant cause of mortality in cirrhotic patients with COVID-19, a significant proportion of them lack initial respiratory symptoms. Most evidence has shown that cirrhotic patients have relatively higher rates of morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19. Advanced cirrhosis was also proposed as an independent factor affecting a poor prognosis and the need to consider COVID-19 palliative care. General measures implemented to prevent the transmission of the virus are also essential for cirrhotic patients, and they should also receive standard cirrhosis care with minimal interruptions. The efficacy of the available COVID-19 vaccines in cirrhotic patients still needs investigation. ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.Entities:
Keywords: Acute liver injury; COVID-19; Cirrhosis; Prognosis; SARS-CoV-2; Therapy
Year: 2021 PMID: 33969082 PMCID: PMC8080735 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i13.2951
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Clin Cases ISSN: 2307-8960 Impact factor: 1.337
Clinical characteristics of cirrhotic patients infected with SARS-CoV-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Qi | 21 | China | HCV: 9.5% | CTP-A: 76.2% | 4.8% | Variceal bleeding: 19% |
| HBV: 42.9% | CTP-B: 14.3% | |||||
| ALD: 9.5% | CTP-C: 9.5% | Ascites: 23.8% | ||||
| AIH: 4.8% | MELD: 8 (7-11) | |||||
| Liu | 17 | China | HCV: 11.8% | CTP-A: 88.2% | APASL:11.8% | Variceal bleeding: 5.9% |
| HBV: 70.6% | CTP-B: 5.9% | |||||
| CTP-C: 5.9% | ||||||
| Iavarone | 50 | Italy | HCV: 28% | CTP-A: 40% | EASL: 28% | HE: 22% |
| HBV: 10% | CTP-B: 28% | |||||
| ALD: 24% | CTP-C: 32% | |||||
| NAFLD: 6% | MELD: 9 (6-15) | |||||
| Sarin | 43 | Asia | Viral: 60.4% | CTP-A: 53.8% | APASL: 11.6% | AD event: 9.3% |
| MAFLD: 32.5% | CTP-B: 37.2% | Variceal bleeding: 9.3% | ||||
| ALD: 4.6% | CTP-C: 9% | HE: 7% | ||||
| AIH: 2.3% | Ascites: 23.3% | |||||
| Jaundice: 23.3% | ||||||
| SBP: 7% | ||||||
| Moon | 103 | International | HCV: 10.5% | CTP-A: 44.7% | N/A | AD event: 25.7% |
| HBV: 11.8% | CTP-B: 29.1% | Variceal bleeding: 1% | ||||
| ALD: 19.7% | CTP-C: 26.2% | HE: 16.5% | ||||
| NAFLD: 22.4% | MELD: 10 | Ascites: 27.2% | ||||
| SBP: 2.9% | ||||||
| Lee | 14 | Korea | HCV: 14.3% | CTP-A: 64.3% | N/A | Secondary infection: 7.1% |
| HBV: 35.7% | CTP-B: 35.7% | |||||
| ALD: 35.7% | MELD: 8 (7-12) | |||||
| AIH: 7.1% | ||||||
| Bajaj | 37 | United States | HCV: 24.3% | MELD: 17.6 ± 8.6 | NACSELD: 30% | Variceal bleeding: 14% |
| ALD: 24.3% | ||||||
| HE: 14% | ||||||
| NASH: 24.3% | ||||||
| Kim | 227 | United States | N/A | Compensated: 59% | N/A | AD event: 29.5% |
| Variceal bleeding: 3.1% | ||||||
| Decompensated: 41% | ||||||
| HE: 10.1% | ||||||
| Ascites: 4.8% | ||||||
| Shalimar | 26 | India | HCV: 7.7% | CTP: 8.6 ± 2.3 | EASL: 34.6% | AD event: 61.5% |
| HBV: 11.5% | MELD: 18.1 ± 9.6 | Variceal bleeding: 30.8% | ||||
| ALD: 34.6% | Ascites: 7.7% | |||||
| NAFLD: 7.7% | ||||||
| AIH: 15.4% | ||||||
| Marjot | 386 | International | HCV: 11% | CTP-A: 52% | EASL: 23% | AD event: 46% |
| HBV: 21% | CTP-B: 30% | Variceal bleeding: 3% | ||||
| ALD: 38% | CTP-C: 17% | HE: 27% | ||||
| NAFLD: 26% | MELD: 12 (8-19) | Ascites: 28% | ||||
| SBP: 3% | ||||||
| Jeon | 67 | Korea | N/A | N/A | N/A | Variceal bleeding: 3% |
| Ascites: 3% | ||||||
| HE: 4.5% |
Cirrhosis severity based on Child-Turcotte-Pugh classification and model for end-stage liver disease score.
Definition of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) based on the The North American Consortium for the Study of End-Stage Liver Disease, Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver, and The European Association for the Study of the Liver guidelines.
Definition of ACLF was not mentioned in the study.
ACLF: Acute-on-chronic liver failure; AD: Acute decompensation; HCV: Hepatitis C virus; HBV: Hepatitis B virus; ALD: Alcohol-related liver disease; AIH: Autoimmune hepatitis; CTP: Child-Turcotte-Pugh; MELD: Model for end-stage liver disease; APASL: Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver; NAFLD: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; EASL: The European Association for the Study of the Liver; SBP: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis; HE: Hepatic encephalopathy; MAFLD: Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease; NASH: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; NACSELD: The North American Consortium for the Study of End-Stage Liver Disease
Figure 1Putative mechanisms of coronavirus disease-2019-related liver injury in the normal liver and the cirrhotic liver. Compared with a normal liver, a cirrhotic liver is more vulnerable to direct injury by the virus because of the widespread ACE2 expression; increased cytokine levels and immune response; similar extent of drug-induced liver injury; more prominent pre-existing liver disease activation; and more severe hypoxic hepatitis. The arrow represents the magnitude of each effect on the liver. The image of SARS-CoV-2 was adapted from an image created by Desiree Ho for the Innovative Genomics Institute. Available from: https://innovativegenomics.org/free-covid-19-illustrations/.
Clinical complications and outcomes of cirrhotic patients infected with SARS-CoV-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Qi | 21 | N/A | ICU: 23.8% | 23.8% |
| MV: 14.3% | ||||
| Shock: 14.3% | ||||
| ARDS: 28.6% | ||||
| RRT: 9.5% | ||||
| ECMO: 9.5% | ||||
| Liu | 17 | Mild | ICU: 17.6% | 17.6% |
| Severe | MV: 11.8% | |||
| Shock: 11.8% | ||||
| ARDS: 29.4% | ||||
| Iavarone[ | 50 | N/A | ICU: 4% | 34% |
| MV: 4% | ||||
| Shock: 8% | ||||
| ARDS: 52% | ||||
| Sarin | 43 | Severe | ICU: 25.6% | 16.3% |
| MV: 23.2% | ||||
| Shock: 14% | ||||
| Moon | 103 | N/A | ICU: 23.3% | 39.8% |
| MV: 17.5% | ||||
| RRT: 4.9% | ||||
| Lee | 14 | N/A | ICU: 35.7%MV: 21.4% | 28.6% |
| RRT: 7.1% | ||||
| Shock: 28.6% | ||||
| ARDS: 35.7% | ||||
| Bajaj | 37 | N/A | ICU: 43% | 30% |
| MV: 38% | ||||
| Shock: 30% | ||||
| RRT: 19% | ||||
| Kim | 227 | N/A | Death, hospitalization, oxygen support, ICU, vasopressor support, or MV: 70.5% | 25.1% |
| Shalimar | 26 | Mild | N/A | 42.3% |
| Moderate | ||||
| Severe | ||||
| Marjot | 386 | N/A | ICU: 28% | 32% |
| MV: 18.4% | ||||
| RRT: 5.4% | ||||
| Jeon | 67 | N/A | ICU: 3% | 9% |
| Shock: 6% | ||||
| RRT: 1.5% |
Severe COVID-19 was defined as severe pneumonia (i.e., SpO2 < 93% despite high -flow nasal cannula O2 or a respiratory rate (RR) > 30 per minute), features of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), acute kidney, heart or circulatory failure, altered sensorium or a combination of the above.
Mild, moderate, and severe coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) were defined as the presence of only upper respiratory tract symptoms without any signs of breathlessness and hypoxia, the presence of pneumonia with a RR between 24 and 30/min and SpO2 between 90% and 94% on room air, and the presence of pneumonia with a RR > 30/min or SpO2 < 90% on room air or severe respiratory distress, respectively.
Severe COVID-19 was defined when patients had 1 of the following criteria: (1) RR ≥ 30/min; (2) Resting SpO2 < 93%; or (3) Oxygenation index of 300 mm Hg or less. Mild COVID-19 was defined as mild clinical symptoms without pneumonia on imaging.
COVID-19: Coronavirus disease-2019; ICU: Intensive care unit; MV: Mechanical ventilator; ARDS: Acute respiratory distress syndrome; RRT: Renal replacement therapy; ECMO: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Guidelines recommended for the management of cirrhosis patients during the COVID-19 pandemic
|
|
|
|
|
| Outpatient | Common rules of physical distancing | Limited outpatient visitsWearing mask and keeping appropriate distancing | Phone or telemedicine |
| Early admission for patient infected with SARS-CoV-2 | Limited family or friend accompanied | Limited travel | |
| Prevent decompensation ( | Video conference, phone or telemedicine | Continue hepatitis B and C treatment | |
| Telemedicine or remote monitor | Provide prescriptions for 90 d instead of 30 dLimited travel | ||
| Continue hepatitis B and C treatment | Continue hepatitis B and C treatment | ||
| Receive vaccination for | |||
| Inpatient | Designate non-COVID-19 ward | Designate non-COVID-19 ward | Option of palliative treatment for advanced liver disease with COVID-19 disease |
| Perform SARS-CoV-2 testing in patient with new or worsening decompensation or ACLF | Perform SARS-CoV-2 testing in patient with new or worsening decompensation or ACLF | ||
| Option of palliative treatment for patient with advanced liver disease with COVID-19 | Minimize interaction and transport for patient | ||
| Telemedicine equipmentLimit patient visitors | |||
| Endoscopy | Limit to emergency ( | Limit to emergency ( | Limit to emergency ( |
| SARS-CoV-2 testing prior to endoscopic procedureNo delay in endoscopy in areas with low COVID-19 burden | SARS-CoV-2 testing prior to endoscopic procedure | PPE used in endoscopy for patient and staff | |
| Noninvasive tool for variceal surveying | PPE used in endoscopy for patient and staff | Variceal survey can be arbitrary postponed 3 mo depend on COVID-19 outbreak. | |
| Clean and disinfect the operation room | Noninvasive tool for variceal survey | ||
| Prophylaxis with beta-blocker instead of endoscopic screening | Prophylaxis with beta-blocker instead of endoscopic screening | ||
| HCC surveillance | Deferred in patients with COVID-19 until recovery | Deferred in patients with COVID-19 until recovery | Prioritized for patients at high risk |
| Prioritized for patients at high risk ( | Continued radiological surveillance, but an arbitrary delay of 2 mo is reasonable | Continued radiological surveillance, but an arbitrary delay of 3 mo is reasonable |
EASL: European Association for the Study of the Liver; AASLD: American Association for the Study of Liver Disease; APASL: Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver; COVID-19: Coronavirus disease-2019; SARS-CoV-2: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; HE: Hepatic encephalopathy; SBP: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis; ACLF: Acute on chronic liver failure; GI: Gastrointestinal; PPE: Personal protective equipment; HCC: Hepatocellular carcinoma