Lori Brand Bateman1, Mona N Fouad1, Andrew Sullivan2, Laura Heider3, Gabriela R Oates4. 1. Division of Preventive Medicine, The Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1717 11th Ave. South, Birmingham, AL, 35205, USA. 2. Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1075 13th Street South, Birmingham, AL, 35294-4440, USA. 3. Ochsner Health, 17050 Medical Center Drive, Baton Rouge, LA 70816, USA. 4. Division of Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1600 7th Avenue South, Lowder 620, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Bikeshare programs have emerged across the US to promote bicycling as an active mode of transportation that could potentially improve health and quality of life. However, bikeshare usage is low in some settings. The purpose of this qualitative study is to explore barriers and facilitators of bikeshare use and to identify potential strategies to increase participation in urban environments. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted with urban bikeshare users in Birmingham, Alabama. Thematic analysis was guided by the PRECEDE model, which identifies predisposing (intrapersonal), reinforcing (interpersonal), and enabling (structural) factors related to a health program. RESULTS: In the four focus groups, the most prominent barriers to utilization identified were age, disability, stigma, and lack of awareness of programs (intrapersonal), having small children (interpersonal), lack of safety and bicycling infrastructure, bikeshare characteristics such as location, time constraints, cost, ease of use, and availability of bikes (structural). The most prominent facilitators included enjoyment (intrapersonal), peer support (interpersonal), and convenience, location, cost, and availability of electric bikes (structural). Recommendations to increase usage were primarily structural, such as infrastructure improvement, incentive programs, awareness and safety campaigns, expansion to neighborhoods and trails, increasing time users can ride before docking, and providing more electric bikes. CONCLUSION: To increase bikeshare use in urban settings, use-restricting policies must be addressed.
INTRODUCTION: Bikeshare programs have emerged across the US to promote bicycling as an active mode of transportation that could potentially improve health and quality of life. However, bikeshare usage is low in some settings. The purpose of this qualitative study is to explore barriers and facilitators of bikeshare use and to identify potential strategies to increase participation in urban environments. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted with urban bikeshare users in Birmingham, Alabama. Thematic analysis was guided by the PRECEDE model, which identifies predisposing (intrapersonal), reinforcing (interpersonal), and enabling (structural) factors related to a health program. RESULTS: In the four focus groups, the most prominent barriers to utilization identified were age, disability, stigma, and lack of awareness of programs (intrapersonal), having small children (interpersonal), lack of safety and bicycling infrastructure, bikeshare characteristics such as location, time constraints, cost, ease of use, and availability of bikes (structural). The most prominent facilitators included enjoyment (intrapersonal), peer support (interpersonal), and convenience, location, cost, and availability of electric bikes (structural). Recommendations to increase usage were primarily structural, such as infrastructure improvement, incentive programs, awareness and safety campaigns, expansion to neighborhoods and trails, increasing time users can ride before docking, and providing more electric bikes. CONCLUSION: To increase bikeshare use in urban settings, use-restricting policies must be addressed.
Entities:
Keywords:
active transportation; bikeshare; neighborhood disadvantage; qualitative methods
Authors: James Woodcock; Phil Edwards; Cathryn Tonne; Ben G Armstrong; Olu Ashiru; David Banister; Sean Beevers; Zaid Chalabi; Zohir Chowdhury; Aaron Cohen; Oscar H Franco; Andy Haines; Robin Hickman; Graeme Lindsay; Ishaan Mittal; Dinesh Mohan; Geetam Tiwari; Alistair Woodward; Ian Roberts Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-11-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Natalie Mueller; David Rojas-Rueda; Tom Cole-Hunter; Audrey de Nazelle; Evi Dons; Regine Gerike; Thomas Götschi; Luc Int Panis; Sonja Kahlmeier; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen Journal: Prev Med Date: 2015-04-18 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Maggie L Grabow; Scott N Spak; Tracey Holloway; Brian Stone; Adam C Mednick; Jonathan A Patz Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2011-11-02 Impact factor: 9.031