| Literature DB >> 33968106 |
Collins Kipngetich Tanui1, Divine Yutefar Shyntum1, Precious K Sedibane1,2, Daniel Bellieny-Rabelo1, Lucy N Moleleki1,2.
Abstract
To adapt to changing environmental niches, bacteria require taxis, a movement toward or away from a stimulus (ligand). Chemotaxis has been studied in some members of the Soft Rot Pectobacteriaceae (SRP), particularly members of the genus Dickeya. On the contrary, there are fewer studies on this topic for the other genus in the SRP group, namely Pectobacterium. This study evaluated chemotactic responses in Pectobacterium brasiliense (Pb 1692) to various ligands. A total of 34 methyl-accepting chemotactic proteins (MCPs) were identified in the Pb 1692 genome and the domain architectures of these MCPs were determined. Four Pb 1692 MCPs previously shown to be differentially expressed during potato tuber infection were selected for further functional characterization. Toward this end, Pb 1692 mutant strains each lacking either AED-0001492, AED-0003671, AED-0000304, or AED-0000744 were generated. Two of these mutants (AED-0001492 and AED-0003671), were attenuated in their ability to grow and respond to citrate and are thus referred to as MCP cit2 and MCP cit1 , respectively, while the other two, AED-0000304 (MCP xyl ) and AED-0000744 (MCP asp ), were affected in their ability to respond to xylose and aspartate, respectively. Trans-complementation of the mutant strains restored swimming motility in the presence of respective ligands. The four MCP mutants were not affected in virulence but were significantly attenuated in their ability to attach to potato leaves suggesting that ecological fitness is an important contribution of these MCPs toward Pb 1692 biology.Entities:
Keywords: Pectobacterium brasiliense; blackleg disease; chemotaxis; ecological fitness; methyl accepting chemotaxis proteins; soft rot; virulence
Year: 2021 PMID: 33968106 PMCID: PMC8100591 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.650894
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
FIGURE 1Representation of domain organization of all 34 MCP in Pb 1692 strain. The organization containing both MCP and HAMP domains is the most common in Pb 1692 strain. All predicted domain structures were made through HMMER software with the support of the Pfam-A database. Transmembrane regions were predicted by the Phobius algorithm. The genes highlighted: (1) black was not upregulated, (2) blue was down-regulated, and (3) red was up-regulated during in-planta infection. Furthermore, genes with “*” indicated those mutated and characterized.
Halo diameter (cm) in motility plate supplemented with 1 mM chemical substance.
| Growth conditions | Halo diameter (cm) in motility plate supplemented with 1 mM chemical substance | ||||||||
| Δ | Δ | Δ | Δ | ||||||
| M9 + Glucose | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.2 |
| M9 + Citric acid | 2.3 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 0.3 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.3 |
| M9 + Aspartate | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 0.1 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.4 |
| M9 + Aspartic acid | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 0.1 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| M9 + Xylose | 2.1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 2.1 |
| M9 + Fructose | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.2 |
| M9 + Jasmonic acid | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.4 |
| M9 + Glutamic acid | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.3 |
| M9 + Ribose | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| M9 + Arginine | 2.0 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| M9 + Valine | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| M9 + Glutamine | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.3 |
| M9 + Methionine | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.2 |
| M9 + Sucrose | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| M9 + Asparagine | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| M9 + Alanine | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.5 |
| M9 + Histidine | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| M9 + Phenylalanine | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| M9 + Serine | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 |
| M9 + Leucine | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| M9 + Maleic acid | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| M9 + Maltose | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| M9 + Mannose | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| M9 + Cysteine | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
FIGURE 2Swimming motility assay. Pb 1692 wild-type was spotted on minimal media supplemented with 1 mM of xylose (A), aspartate (B), and citrate (C,D). Similarly, mutant strains lacking AED-0000304 (Pb1692ΔMCP), AED-0000744 (Pb1692ΔMCP), AED-0003671 (Pb1692ΔMCP), and AED-0001492 (Pb1692ΔMCP) were spotted on minimal media supplemented with 1 mM of xylose (E), aspartate (F) and citrate (G,H), respectively. Complemented strains Pb1692ΔMCP–pxyl Pb1692ΔMCP–pasp, Pb1692ΔMCP–pcit1, and Pb1692ΔMCP–pcit2, were spotted on minimal media supplemented with 1 mM of aspartate (I), xylose (J) citrate (K,L), respectively.
FIGURE 3MCP mutants were attenuated in their ability to attach to potato leaves. Determination of CFU/ml from potato leaves after 2 h incubation with 10 μl of each mutant strain (OD600 equivalent to 1.0) in M9 media. Three independent experiments were performed each with three technical replicates with a corresponding standard error of the mean. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between mutants, wild-type, and complemented strains are shown by an asterisk.
Bacterial and plasmid strains were used in this study.
| Bacterial strains/plasmid | Characteristic | Source |
| Isolated from potato in Brazil, sequenced strain | ||
| This study | ||
| This study | ||
| This study | ||
| This study | ||
| This study | ||
| This study | ||
| This study | ||
| This study | ||
| pKD4 | Plasmid containing a Kanr cassette flanked by FTR sites | |
| pKD20 | Plasmid expressing the lambda red genes | |
| pJET1.2/blunt | Cloning vector, Ampr | Thermo-Fisher |
Primers used in this study (*represents primers used for fusion).
| Primer | 5′-3′ nucleotides | Source |
| name | ||
| TFcit1 | Agcatggaagaactgacatcg | This study |
| TRcit1 | Aaccatgttcgggttgttgtg | This study |
| F1cit1* | Agccaaatcagtactgaagcctc | This study |
| R1cit1 | Cgaagcagctccagcctacacatgcattataactctccatgtataacg | This study |
| kFcit1 | Cgttatacatggagagttataatgcatgtgtaggctggagctgcttcg | This study |
| kRcit1 | gtgaagtatccgggcgtgaggcgttaaacatatgaatatcctccttagttcctattccgaag | This study |
| F2cit1 | cttcggaataggaactaaggaggatattcatatgtttaacgcctcacgcccggatacttcac | This study |
| R2cit1* | Ttggttgcgtgatgcgtctgc | This study |
| TFcit2 | Gattcacaccatgcagcacac | This study |
| TRcit2 | Ttcgttcctgctctcatgacc | This study |
| F1cit2* | Acatttcaatctgcgtgtcgtc | This study |
| R1cit2 | Gaagcagctccagcctacacagctaagaacatgacgtctctccgg | This study |
| KFcit2 | Ccggagagacgtcatgttcttagctgtgtaggctggagctgcttc | This study |
| KRcit2 | Cagggctgaaggatcgaacgttagcatatgaatatcctccttagttc | This study |
| F2cit2 | Gaactaaggaggatattcatatgctaacgttcgatccttcagccctg | This study |
| R2cit2* | Cgcataacgattattcagagc | This study |
| TFcit2 | Gattcacaccatgcagcacac | This study |
| TFasp | Aaagaaggcgactggattgc | This study |
| TRasp | Accgagtaatgggcaacgtag | This study |
| F1asp* | Gtcttactgttacacggaacg | This study |
| R1asp | Cgaagcagctccagcctacacacttacgaaacataaattatccctg | This study |
| KFasp | Cagggataatttatgtttcgtaagtgtgtaggctggagctgcttcg | This study |
| KRasp | Gccatttaacgattagcgggcatcatatgaatatcctccttagttc | This study |
| F2asp | Gaactaaggaggatattcatatgatgcccgctaatcgttaaatggc | This study |
| R2asp* | Aggtatcgctgagcgaaagtg | This study |
| TFxyl | Gctctgcgcgatgcggatatc | This study |
| TRxyl | Ctatgcaggtcgtagacgcag | This study |
| F1xyl* | Ccagctccaacttcggtaacg | This study |
| R1xyl | Cgaagcagctccagcctacacagggatttcataggtgtgctc | This study |
| KFxyl | Gagcacacctatgaaatccctgtgtaggctggagctgcttcg | This study |
| KRxyl | Gtcttaatgcactaccttgataacagcgcatatgaatatcctccttagttc | This study |
| F2xyl | Gaactaaggaggatattcatatgcgctgttatcaaggtagtgcattaagac | This study |
| R2xyl* | Ttcatcggcatcgctatcttg | This study |
| TFxyl | Gctctgcgcgatgcggatatc | This study |
| CFcit1F | Tggaccaccttctaacgttcg | This study |
| CRcit1R | Ttgataccgctatagggttcc | This study |
| CFcit2 | Tcactaatcggtatacttcac | This study |
| CRcit2 | Acgtcatatcagggctgaagg | This study |
| CFasp | Agataccagcggacatggcac | This study |
| CRasp | Ctcagatagggtctagtgttg | This study |
| CFxyl | Tgagcccttcttacctcttcac | This study |
| CRxyl | Aggacagcagatactgctgtc | This study |