| Literature DB >> 33968087 |
Yang Wei1,2, Xuejiao Gao1, Feng Zhao2, Didar Baimanov2,3, Yalin Cong2,3,4, Yingying Jiang2,5, Saima Hameed2, Yixin Ouyang2,6, Xingfa Gao1, Xiaoying Lin7, Liming Wang2,3.
Abstract
Perovskite nanomaterials (NMs) possess excellent physicochemical properties and have promising applications in light-emitting diodes (LEDs), lasers, photodetectors, and artificial synapse electronics. Potential exposure to these NMs happens in the manufacture and application of the perovskite-based products, however, the biological safety of these NMs is still unknown. Here, we used the LaNiO3 NM (LNO), a typical kind of perovskite nanostructures to study the interaction with macrophages (J774A.1) and to explore its biological effects at the cellular level. Firstly, we characterized the properties of LNO including the size, shape, and crystal structure using Transmission electronic microscope (TEM), Dynamic lighting scattering (DLS), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). Secondly, to gain a better understanding of the biological effect, we evaluated the effect of LNO on cell viability and found that LNO induced cell autophagy at a concentration of 5 μg/ml and influenced the inflammatory response based on RT-PCR result. Finally, we demonstrated the mechanism that LNO causes cell autophagy and immune response is probably due to the metal ions released from LNO in acidic lysosomes, which triggered ROS and increased lysosomal membrane permeation. This study indicates the safety aspect of perovskite NMs and may guide the rational design of perovskite NMs with more biocompatibility during their manufacture and application.Entities:
Keywords: LaNiO3; autophagy; dissolution; inflammation response; perovskite nanomaterials
Year: 2021 PMID: 33968087 PMCID: PMC8100511 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.676773
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Characterization of LNO. (A) TEM images of LNO NMs as dispersed in water and ALF. (B) Powder X-ray diffraction patterns of LNO NMs as dispersed in water (red line) and ALF (black line). (C) Size distribution of LNO NMs in water as determined by DLS.
Figure 2Cytotoxicity and localization of lno nms. (A) Images of j774a.1 cells before and after treatment with 2.5 and 5 µg/ml LNO as observed by an optical microscope. (B) Dosage-dependent effects of LNO on J774A.1 viability after 24 h exposure as determined by cck-8 assay (n=6). (C) TEM images of subcellular structures and intracellular location of LNO after 24 h treatment. The arrows indicate the lysosomes.
Figure 3Cell autophagy induced by LNO. (A) TEM images for the subcellular structures indicating the induced autophagolysosome in J774A.1 cells after 12 h exposure to 5 µg/ml LNO. (B) Images of the autophagy-specific fluorescent probe when J774A.1 cells were exposed to LNO for 12 h and labeled with the probes as observed by CLSM. (C) The expression of autophagy-related proteins including lC3-i, lC3-ii, and p62 in J774A.1 cells after LNO exposure for 12 has detected by western blotting. (D) The ratio of intensity of the lC3-i, lC3-ii, and p62 protein expression compared to β-actin as calculated by the gray value according to Image J software. (E) The ratio of the lC3-ii VS lC3-i expression calculated by the gray value according to Image J software.
Figure 4Influence of LNO on the lysosomal membrane permeation. The lysosomal membrane integrity of J774A.1 before (A) and after the exposure (B) to 5 μg/ml LNO 12 h using AO staining. The scale bar represents 20 μm.
Figure 5Cellular uptake of LNO and the release of La and Ni from LNO. (A) The uptake of LNO in J774A.1 cells after exposure to 5 µg/ml LNO as determined by ICP-MS (n=5). The signs (** and ***) indicates significant different for the level of La and Ni between the group and that at 3h uptake with p < 0.01 an p < 0.001, respectively. (B) The exocytosis of La and Ni elements in the supernatant as detected by ICP-MS. Cells were exposed to 5 µg/ml LNO for 12 h and then further cultured in fresh medium for 36 h (n=5). The signs (** and ***) indicates significant different for the level of La and Ni between the group and that at exo 12h with p < 0.01 an p < 0.001, respectively. (C) The percentage of the released La ions and Ni ions in J774A.1 cells that was calculated by the formula of the amount of element released/the uptaken element amount. (D) The persistent release of metal ions from LNO when LNO was incubated with ALF solution as detect by ICP-MS (n=5). The sign *** indicates the very significant difference between samples and control (p < 0.001).
Figure 6Intracellular ROS level after the exposure to LNO. (A–C) Optical images for intracellular ROS stained by DCFHDA when cells are treated by 2.5 and 5 µg/ml LNO for 12 h. (D) Quantitative analysis of relative intensity of intracellular DCF fluorescence based on optical images. Data are expressed by mean value and standard errors (n=3).
Figure 7Regulation of immune response in the macrophages by LNO. The expression of NF-κB (A),TNF-α (B), IL-6 (C), and IL-1β (D) in J774A.1 cells after the exposure to 2.5 and 5 µg/ml LNO for 12 h as measured by RT-PCR (n=3). The sign ** indicates the significant difference between the LNO-treated group and the control.
Figure 8The mechanism of LNO induces protective autophagy of monocytes by inhibiting the expression of inflammatory factors to promote immune response.