| Literature DB >> 33968015 |
Bernard Tornyigah1,2, Tania d'Almeida1,3, Guillaume Escriou1, Firmine Viwami4, Nadine Fievet1,4, Adrian J F Luty1,4, Achille Massougbodji4, Morten A Nielsen5, Philippe Deloron1, Nicaise Tuikue Ndam1,2.
Abstract
Sequestration of Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes expressing the VAR2CSA antigen in the placenta results in poor pregnancy outcomes, including low birth weight and maternal anemia. Antigen-specific antibody-mediated immunity is acquired during successive pregnancies. Thus, evaluating VAR2CSA-specific IgG profiles among pregnant women will increase knowledge on the immunological mechanisms associated with protection, and help in the development of VAR2CSA-based placental malaria vaccines. Using the PAMVAC candidate vaccine antigen, we assessed anti-VAR2CSA IgG subclass responses of a cohort of pregnant Beninese, and analyzed their relationships with pregnancy outcomes. Cytophilic IgG1 and IgG3 responses were the most frequent, with prevalences ranging from 28% (IgG3) up to 50% (IgG1). Elevated levels of VAR2CSA-specific total IgG and cytophilic IgG3 during pregnancy were consistently associated with higher birth weights, whilst high levels of IgG4 were associated with a reduced risk of placental infections. This suggests that protective anti-VAR2CSA IgG responses are coordinated between both cytophilic and non-cytophilic antibodies.Entities:
Keywords: IgG subclasses; IgG3; IgG4; VAR2CSA; malaria; pregnancy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33968015 PMCID: PMC8099026 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.610305
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Characteristics of the population.
| Mothers | N=470 |
|---|---|
|
| 26.48± 6.18 |
|
| 78 (16.6%) |
|
| 392 (83.4%) |
|
| |
| 0 | 234 (49.8%) |
| 1 | 132 (28.1%) |
| 2 | 63 (13.4%) |
| ≥3 | 41 (8.7%) |
|
| |
| Yes | 63 (13.4%) |
| No | 405 (86.2%) |
|
| 2 (0.4%) |
|
| |
| Yes | 82 (17.4%) |
| No | 358 (76.2%) |
| Unknown | 30 (6.4%) |
|
| |
| Negative | 265 (56.4%) |
| Submicroscopic | 121 (25.74%) |
| BS Positive | 80 (17.0%) |
|
| |
|
| 2982.22± 434.23 |
|
| |
| Yes | 49 (10.1%) |
| No | 418 (88.9%) |
| Unknown | 3 (0.6%) |
|
| |
| Yes | 53 (11.3%) |
| No | 417 (88.7%) |
|
| |
| Yes | 24 (5.1%) |
| No | 446 (94.9%) |
BS, Blood smear; SGA, small for gestational age.
Figure 1IgG subclass profile to ID1-ID2a recombinant protein from pregnant women followed during the course of pregnancy (inclusion, antenatal visits (ANV) and delivery). (A) The distribution of IgG subclasses. Shown are IgG subclasses antibody levels (median and IQR) in arbitrary units. (B) IgG subclass seroprevalence. The profile of IgG subclasses clearly shows a cytophilic IgG’s (IgG1 and IgG3) are the predominant IgGs while low prevalence of non-cytophilic IgG’s (IgG2 and IgG4) were also observed.
Relationship between antibody levels to ID1-ID2a construct of VAR2CSA and pregnancy outcomes (Total IgG and IgG1).
| Covariates | Total IgG | IgG 1 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate | Multivariate(**) | Univariate | Multivariate(**) | |||||||||
| β | 95% CI |
| Adj β | 95% CI |
| β | 95% CI |
| Adj β | 95% CI |
| |
|
| _ | _ | _ | |||||||||
| Yes | -9.07 | -14,94; -3,21 |
| -9.9 | -15,91; -3,90 |
| -3.29 | -12,68; 6,10 | 0.49 | |||
|
| _ | _ | _ | _ | ||||||||
| 1 | 5.18 | 3,62; 6,75 | 4.46 | 2,83; 6,09 | 6.16 | 3,24; 9,7 |
| 4.92 |
| |||
| 2 | 7.73 | 3,75; 11,70 |
| 7.93 | 3,83; 12,02 |
| 12.92 | 4,50; 21,34 | 12.37 | |||
| ≥3 | 13.56 | 3,13; 23,99 | 14.30 | 3,92; 24,68 | 7.66 | -9,20; 24,52 | 5.44 | |||||
|
| 0.0002 | 0,00008; 0,0002 |
| 0.0001 | 0,000016; 0,00027 |
| 0.0004 | 0,0002; 0,0005 |
| 0,00002 | -0,0003; 0,0003 | 0,89 |
|
| _ | _ | ||||||||||
| Yes | -6.93 | -16,93; 3,08 | 0.17 | -4,04 | -14,45; 6,38 | 0,45 | 0.05 | -13,75; 13,84 | 0.99 | -0,84 | -18,01; 16;33 | 0,93 |
|
| _ | _ | _ | |||||||||
| Yes | -4.45 | -11,48; 2,58 | 0.22 | -4,04 | -12,04; 3,96 | 0,32 | 1.47 | -9,39; 12,35 | 0.79 | -1,58 | -13,65; 10,48 | 0,80 |
|
| _ | _ | _ | _ | ||||||||
| Yes | 3.69 | -2,77; 10,14 | 0.26 | 1,73 | -4,70; 8,16 | 0,59 | 11.43 | -0,88; 23,73 | 0.07 | 7,88 | -4,65; 20,41 | 0,22 |
|
| _ | _ | _ | |||||||||
| Yes | -9.04 | -16,22; -1,85 |
| -10.74 | -18,04; -3,45 |
| -0,59 | -11,48; 10,30 | 0.92 | -6,24 | -17,33; 4,86 | 0,27 |
|
| _ | _ | _ | |||||||||
| Yes | 1,74 | -3,99; 7,48 | 0.55 | 0,44 | -5,18; 6,06 | 0,88 | 3.31 | -5,87; 12,49 | 0.48 | 1,65 | -7,52; 10,82 | 0,73 |
(*) number of documented blood smear positive during follow-up.
(**) Multivariate analysis were adjusted for timepoint.
Relationship between antibody levels to ID1-ID2a construct of VAR2CSA and pregnancy outcomes (IgG2, IgG3 and IgG4).
| Covariates | IgG 2 | IgG 3 | IgG 4 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate | Multivariate(**) | Univariate | Multivariate(**) | Univariate | Multivariate(**) | |||||||||||||
| β | 95% CI |
| Adj β | 95% CI |
| β | 95% CI |
| Adj β | 95% CI |
| β | 95% CI |
| Adj β | 95% CI |
| |
|
| _ | _ | _ | |||||||||||||||
| Yes | -7.15 | -15,52; 1,23 | 0.09 | -7,32 | -15,69; 1,05 | 0,09 | 2.17 | -4,89; 9,23 | 0.55 | -0.08 | -6,32; 6,16 | 0.98 | ||||||
|
| _ | _ | _ | _ | ||||||||||||||
| 1 | 2.21 | 0,09; 4,32 | 0.23 | 8.12 | 5,47; 10,77 |
| 7.94 | 5,21; 10,66 |
| -1.81 | -6,57; 2,96 | 0.7 | ||||||
| 2 | 0.93 | -4,78; 6,64 | 10.08 | 2,46; 17,69 | 10.12 | 2,47; 17,76 | -1.54 | -15,43; 12,36 | ||||||||||
| ≥3 | -0.35 | -14,35; 13,64 | 2.97 | -12,26; 18,22 | 2.93 | -12,37; 18,22 | -13.56 | -41,33; 14,20 | ||||||||||
|
| 0.0001 | -0,0001; 0,0002 | 0.09 | 0.0001 |
| 0.00004 | -0,0001; 0,0002 | 0,59 | -0.0001 | -0,0004; 0,0001 | 0.33 | |||||||
|
| _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | ||||||||||||
| Yes | -2.9 | -14,13; 8,33 | 0.61 | -3,49 | -15,17; 8,19 | 0,56 | -0.46 | -10,75; 9,82 | 0.92 | 9,29 | -3,39; 21,98 | 0,15 | -1.46 | -10,54; 7,62 | 0.75 | -0,26 | -11,61; 11,09 | 0,96 |
|
| _ | _ | _ | |||||||||||||||
| Yes | 0.25 | -9,10; 9,60 | 0.96 | -1,48 | -11,73; 8,77 | 0,78 | 1.87 | -6,36; 10,09 | 0.66 | 6,62 | -2,38; 15,61 | 0,15 | -4.39 | -11,54; 2,76 | 0,23 | -3,33 | -10,56; 3,89 | 0,36 |
|
| _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | |||||||||||||
| Yes | 8.99 | -1,89; 19,88 | 0.10 | 10,09 | -1,20; 21,39 | 0,08 | -1.06 | -10,17; 8,05 | 0.82 | -2,18 | -11,47; 7,11 | 0,65 | -8.86 | -16,97; -0,75 |
| -8.86 | -16,97; -0,75 |
|
|
| _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | ||||||||||||
| Yes | -1.01 | -10,40; 8,38 | 0.83 | -0,91 | -14,75; 12,94 | 0,89 | -5.58 | -13,69; 2,52 | 0,18 | -10.79 | -19,15; -2,45 |
| -4,15 | -11,32; 3,01 | 0,26 | -2,49 | -10,23; 5,23 | 0,53 |
|
| _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | ||||||||||||
| Yes | -2.27 | -10,03; 5,50 | 0.56 | -2,04 | -10,27; 6,18 | 0,63 | 1.04 | -5,95; 8,03 | 0.77 | -0,64 | -7,64; 6,36 | 0,86 | -0.92 | -7,09; 5,25 | 0.77 | -0,91 | -7,27; 5,44 | 0,77 |
(*) number of documented blood smear positive during follow-up.
(**) Multivariate analysis were adjusted for timepoint.