| Literature DB >> 33967982 |
Jannie Munk Kristensen1, Caitlin Singleton1, Lee-Ann Clegg1, Francesca Petriglieri1, Per Halkjaer Nielsen1.
Abstract
Microbial communities inEntities:
Keywords: Acidobacteriota; FISH-probe design; MAGS; metagenomics; wastewater treatment plants
Year: 2021 PMID: 33967982 PMCID: PMC8100337 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.643950
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1(A) Boxplot of the relative abundances of the 10 most abundant phyla in 37 Danish activated sludge plants (2006–2017). (B) Boxplot of the 10 most abundant genera of “Acidobacteriota” found in the same plants, and their respective families or nearest known taxa. The MiDAS 3 placeholder name from the MiDAS taxonomy is shown in parentheses.
FIGURE 2A heatmap showing the average abundance distribution of the top 10 most abundant genera of “Acidobacteriota” in 21 Danish wastewater treatment plants.
FIGURE 3Phylogenetic 16S rRNA gene tree showing the members of the “Acidobacteriota” found in activated sludge combined with reference sequences from the SILVAv. 138 database (left). Labels show the family names of “Acidobacteriota”. Unknown de novo families are displayed with de novo MiDAS 3 placeholder names. Groups in gray color contain only MiDAS 3 reference database sequences, blue groups contain only sequences from SILVAv. 138, and green groups contain a combination of MiDAS and SILVAv. 138 sequences. MiDAS 3 sequences from the phylum Nitrospirota were used as an outgroup. Bootstrap values for 1,000 replicates are indicated by percentage values. Coverage of newly designed FISH probes is indicated to the right and clades where metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) were retrieved are indicated by an orange star.
Details of the designed Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes.
| Probe | Target family | Target genus | Coverage* | Coverage* with 1 mismatch | Coverage* with 2 mismatches | Sequence (5′–3′) | (FA)% | Validated against | Study | |
| Blasto_312 | 312–334 | – | 43/46 (0) | 46/46 (0) | 46/46 (0) | CCC GTT ATT CAG TGT CAG TGT G | 30 | This study | ||
| Holo_1154 | 1154–1174 | – | 37/37 (0) | 37/37 (226) | 37/37 (238) | CGG TTA ACC CGG GCA GTC CC | 35 | Activated sludge | This study | |
| Holo_1154_C1 | 1154–1174 | Competitor for Holo_1154 | – | 0/0 (226) | N/A | N/A | CGG TTA ACC CGG GCA GTC TC | N/A | ||
| Geo_662 | 662–685 | 18/18 (0) | 18/18 (2) | 18/18 (109) | ACG AGG AAT TCC ACC ACC CTC TC | 30 | Activated sludge | This study | ||
| Geo_662_C1 | 662–685 | Competitor for Geo_662 | – | 0/0 (2) | N/A | N/A | ACC AGG AAT TCC ACC ACC CTC TC | N/A | ||
| Geo_662_C2 | 662–685 | Competitor for Geo_662 | – | 0/0 (20) | N/A | N/A | ACT GGG AAT TCC ACC ACC CTC TC | N/A | ||
| Acido-1162 | 1162–1179 | Subgroup 10 | 18/19 (0) | 19/19 (0) | 19/19 (7) | TCC TCC CCG ATT TCC GGG | 25 | – | ||
| Acido-1162c1 | 1162–1179 | Competitor for Acido-1162 | – | 0/0 (7) | N/A | N/A | TCC TCC CCG TTT TCC GGG | N/A | ||
| Acido-1162h1 | 1162–1179 | Helper for Acido-1162 | – | N/A | N/A | N/A | GGA CTT GAC GTC ATC CCC RCC Y | N/A | ||
| Mb2424_1414 | 1414–1436 | Midas_f_352 | Midas_g_433 | 09/09 (0) | 09/09 (60) | 09/09 (83) | CTT CTA GTA CAG CCA GCT TTC G | 35 | Activated sludge | This study |
| Mb2424_1414_C1 | 1414–1436 | Competitor for mb2424_1414 | 0/0 (21) | N/A | N/A | TTT CTA GTA CAG CCA GCT TTC G | N/A | |||
| Subg6_383 | 383–401 | – | 39/39 (0) | 39/39 (23) | 39/39 (526) | GCG TTG CGT CGT CAG GCT | 25 | Activated sludge | This study | |
| F11-24_480 | 480–502 | Midas_f_1424 | – | 05/06 (0) | 06/06 (0) | 06/06 (1) | GGG CTT ACA TAT GGT ACC GTC A | 25 | Activated sludge | This study |
| DS-100_138 | 138–160 | Midas_f_502 | – | 14/14 (0) | 14/14 (0) | 14/14 (1) | GGA TCG TTA TTC CCC ACC CAA | 40 | Activated sludge | This study |
| DS-100_138_C1 | 138–160 | Competitor for DS-100_138 | – | 0/0 (1) | N/A | N/A | GGA ACG TTA TTC CCC ACC GAA | N/A | – | |
| DS-100_H117 | 117–141 | Helper probe for DS-100 | – | N/A | N/A | N/A | AGG CAG ATT ACC CAC GTG TTA CTC | N/A | ||
| DS-100_H159 | 159–185 | Helper probe for DS-100 | – | N/A | N/A | N/A | CGT TAT GCG GTA TTA GCG ACC CTT TC | N/A | ||
| Btb7_22_485 | 485–503 | Midas_f_1096 | midas_g_1096 | 28/28 (0) | 28/28 (20) | 28/28 (346) | GGC TTC CTC CAC CGG TAC | 40 | Activated sludge | This study |
| f_973_819 | 819–837 | Midas_f_973 | – | 22/22 (0) | 22/22 (2) | 22/22 (172) | CCG ACA CCA AGC ACC CAT | 35 | Activated sludge | This study |
| Soli_499 | 499–517 | “ | – | 40/40 (0) | 40/40 (168) | 40/40 (3971) | GCA CGT AGT TAG CCG CAG CT | 35 | Activated sludge | This study |
FIGURE 4FISH images of the nine most abundant “Acidobacteriota” genera, ranked according to abundances detected by amplicon sequencing as shown on Figure 1B. Genus or family-specific probes are shown in red and the universal EUB-mix probe is shown in green. The images for the three genera, JGI_0001001-H03, Stenotrophobacter, and Blastocatella were taken using the family-specific Blasto_312 probe on samples where only that specific genus was found by amplicon sequencing. Midas_g_502 was visualized with the probe DS-100_138 targeting all sequences from midas_f_502 in the order DS-100. Midas_g_352 was imaged with the probe Subg6_383 targeting Vicinamibacteraceae (midas_f_502).
Comparison of amplicon and FISH abundances.
| Abundance% | ||||
| WWTP/target organism | Sample date | Probe | Amplicon sequencing* | qFISH |
| Odense NE | 2012-08-19 | Blasto_312 | 0.4 | 0.1 ± 0 |
| Fredericia | 2014-02-03 | Blasto_312 | 0.5 | 0.1 ± 0.1 |
| Hjørring | 2007-06-05 | Geo_662 | 4.2 | 5 ± 1.6 |
| Skive | 2006-10-28 | Geo_662 | 2.2 | 2.6 ± 0.6 |
| Bjergmarken | 2017-11-30 | Subg6_383 | 0.4 | 0.6 ± 0.2 |
| Avedøre | 2017-09-06 | Subg6_383 | 0.6 | 0.8 ± 0.2 |
| Odense NE | 2006-09-06 | Subg6_383 | 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.2 |
| Kalundborg | 2017-08-19 | F11-24_480 | 2.6 | 1.3 ± 0.4 |
| Esbjerg W | 2015-08-24 | F11-24_480 | 0.4 | 0.5 ± 0.3 |
| Randers | 2010-08-19 | DS-100_138 | 1.1 | 0.4 ± 0.2 |
| Aalborg W | 2008-10-28 | DS-100_138 | 0.9 | 0.2 ± 0.1 |
| Esbjerg W | 2016-11-01 | Btb_7_22_485 | 0.5 | 0.1 ± 0.1 |
| Aalborg W | 2010-10-28 | Btb_7_22_485 | 0.5 | 0.1 ± 0.1 |
| Mariagerfjord | 2016-09-05 | F973_819 | 0.5 | 1.2 ± 0.4 |
| Egå | 2014-08-18 | F973_819 | 0.5 | 0.7 ± 0.3 |
| Lundtofte | 2013-08-19 | F973_819 | 0.8 | 0.5 ± 0.2 |
| Aalborg W | 2014-08-18 | Soli_499 | 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.5 |
| Ringkøbing | 2012-08-19 | Soli_499 | 0.4 | 0.6 ± 0.4 |
| Ribe | 2014-11-10 | Soli_499 | 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.4 |
FIGURE 5Phylogenetic maximum likelihood genome tree based on the concatenated alignment of 120 single copy proteins created by GTDB-Tk with GTDB RefSeq release 95. Five Chloroflexota genomes were used as the outgroup. Stars indicate the species representatives after 95% ANI clustering. Orange stars indicate the circular MAGs. Bootstrap support >70% is shown by the solid black circles. KEGG modules and genes are indicated by the presence/absence of colored squares (see Supplementary Table 4 for specific KOs). The two novel Geothrix species are highlighted in red, with the species representatives bolded. Solibacteriaceae_S3 is “Solibacteriaceae” subgroup 3 in MiDAS 3 taxonomy.
FIGURE 6Fluorescence in situ hybridization images of the two new Geothrix species, “Candidatus Geothrix skivensis” (left) and “Candidatus Geothrix odensensis” (right). They are visualized in activated sludge samples only containing that specific candidatus species in the genus Geothrix (as evaluated by amplicon sequencing) using the genus-specific probe Geo_662 (magenta) and the general probe EUB-mix (cyan).