| Literature DB >> 33967933 |
Wei You1, Junqiang Feng1, Qinglin Liu1, Xinke Liu1, Jian Lv1, Yuhua Jiang1, Peng Liu1, Youxiang Li1.
Abstract
Spontaneous vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm has been increasingly attributed as a major cause of focal neurological deficits due to vertebrobasilar artery ischemia or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Although the development of spontaneous vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (VADA) is rare, de novo VADA after treatment of contralateral vertebral artery (VA) is more less frequently observed. There are only a few reports related to de novo VADA after treatment of the contralateral VA in the medical literature. The mechanisms responsible for de novo dissection after treatment of unilateral VADA are still not clearly understood. In this manuscript, we report an unusual case of a patient with a de novo VADA after placement of a pipeline embolization device (PED) stent on the contralateral VA along with a thorough review of the literature. A 42-years old male patient was referred to the hospital with sudden onset of dizziness, nausea, and vomiting. Initial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) images demonstrated a VADA in the fourth segment of the left VA without the involvement of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA). There were no significant abnormalities found in the right vertebral artery. He underwent an endovascular pipeline embolization to treat the dissecting aneurysm (DA). Surprisingly, follow-up DSA imaging 14 months after the initial treatment showed a segmental dilatation and narrowing of the right VA, which suggested a de novo VADA on the right side that had occurred postoperatively. This was followed by a tent-assisted coil embolization therapy for occluding this de novo VADA. This patient showed an uneventful postoperative course with no neurological abnormalities. In addition to hemodynamic stress changes, the unique clinicopathological features of dissecting aneurysms may contribute significantly to the pathogenesis of de novo VA dissection. Given that VA in VADA patients may be vulnerable on both sides, it is important to consider the risk of de novo dissection after initial aneurysm treatment. The bilateral vertebral artery has to be carefully observed when treating any VADA patient to prevent any complications.Entities:
Keywords: bilateral vertebral artery dissection; de novo aneurysm; endovascular embolization; pipeline embolization device; vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm
Year: 2021 PMID: 33967933 PMCID: PMC8102744 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.599197
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1MR image detected a partially thrombosed aneurysm adjacent to the left part of medulla (A). 3D DSA image demonstrated a VADA in the fourth segment of the left VA (B). Angiography at 5 months follow-up revealed that the stent were patent with partial aneurysm residues (C). Partial residual aneurysm of the left VADA was observed on 14 months (D) and 2 years (F) follow-up angiography, and complete occlusion on 3 years (G). The volume of the aneurysm was not significantly changed from 14 months (E) and 2 years follow-up MR images (H).
Figure 2No abnormalities were found in the right VA at the time of 5 months after initial treatment (A). Follow-up imaging 14 months postoperatively showed a segmental dilatation and narrowing of the right VA, which suggested that a de novo VADA occurred (B). Stent-assisted coil embolization therapy was performed to occlude this de novo VADA (C). Angiography at 20 months follow-up after surgery revealed a complete occlusion of the aneurysm (D).
A summary of case reports of de novo VADA after the treatment of the contralateral VA.
| Kubo et al. ( | 49/F | L | SAH | Proximal occlusion | 3 W | R | Asymptomatic | Proximal occlusion | GR |
| Otawara et al. ( | 51/F | R | SAH | Surgical trapping | 1 Mon | L | Asymptomatic | Conservation | GR |
| Inui et al. ( | 36/M | L | Infraction | Conservation | 12 Mon | R | Infraction | Conservation | Dead |
| 45/M | L | SAH | Endovascular trapping | 2 W | R | Infraction | Conservation | SD | |
| Katsuno et al. ( | 39/M | L | SAH | Surgical trapping | 8 H | R | SAH | Conservation | Dead |
| Kidani et al. ( | 55/F | L | SAH | Endovascular trapping | 3 Mon | R | Asymptomatic | Conservation | GR |
| Tsuji et al. ( | 52/M | L | Infraction | Conservation | 9 D | R | SAH | Endovascular trapping | GR |
| Present 2020 | 42/M | L | Asymptomatic | Endovascular stenting | 14 Mon | R | Asymptomatic | SAC | GR |
F, female; M, male; L, left; R, rightl; SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage; W, week; Mon, month; H, hour; D, day; SAC, Stent-assisted coil; GR, good recovery.