| Literature DB >> 33967823 |
Sara Magnani1,2, Gabriele Mulliri1,2, Silvana Roberto1, Fabio Sechi1, Giovanna Ghiani1, Gianmarco Sainas1, Giorgio Nughedu1, Romina Vargiu3, Pier Paolo Bassareo4, Antonio Crisafulli1,2.
Abstract
Acute hypoxia (AH) is a challenge to the homeostasis of the cardiovascular system, especially during exercise. Research in this area is scarce. We aimed to ascertain whether echocardiographic, Doppler, and tissue Doppler measures were able to detect changes in systolic and diastolic functions during the recovery after mild exercise in AH. Twelve healthy males (age 33.5 ± 4.8 years) completed a cardiopulmonary test on an electromagnetically braked cycle-ergometer to determine their maximum workload (Wmax). On separate days, participants performed randomly assigned two exercise sessions consisting in 3 min pedalling at 30% of Wmax: (1) one test was conducted in normoxia (NORMO) and (2) one in normobaric hypoxia with FiO2 set to 13.5% (HYPO). Hemodynamics were assessed with an echocardiographic system. The main result was that the HYPO session increased parameters related to myocardial contractility such as pre-ejection period and systolic myocardial velocity with respect to the NORMO test. Moreover, the HYPO test enhanced early transmitral filling peak velocities. No effects were detected for left ventricular volumes, as end-diastolic, end-systolic, and stroke volume were similar between the NORMO and the HYPO test. Results of the present investigation support the hypothesis that a brief, mild exercise bout in acute normobaric hypoxia does not impair systolic or diastolic functions. Rather, it appears that stroke volume is well preserved and that systolic and early diastolic functions are enhanced by exercise in hypoxia.Entities:
Keywords: blood pressure; cardiac pre-load; echocardiography; myocardial contractility; tissue Doppler
Year: 2021 PMID: 33967823 PMCID: PMC8103167 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.650696
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Mean values ± SD of metabolic data at the anaerobic threshold (AT) and at maximum workload (Wmax) collected during the cardiopulmonary test. V̇O2, oxygen uptake expressed indexed for body mass (second line) as well as in absolute values (third line); V̇CO2, carbon dioxide production; RER, respiratory exchange ratio; VE, pulmonary ventilation; HR, heart rate. N = 12.
| AT | Wmax | |
|---|---|---|
| Workload (W) | 165.80 ± 31.68 | 244.27 ± 38.40 |
| V̇O2 (ml·kg−1·min−1) | 25.61 ± 3.18 | 38.45 ± 4.10 |
| V̇O2 (ml·min−1) | 2,008 ± 350 | 2,780 ± 528 |
| V̇CO2 (ml·kg−1·min−1) | 1,771 ± 440 | 3,920 ± 688 |
| RER | 1.08 ± 0.10 | 1.41 ± 0.05 |
| VE (l·min−1) | 42.75 ± 10.91 | 98.34 ± 18.06 |
| HR (bpm) | 146.15 ± 8.65 | 182.50 ± 10.50 |
Hemodynamic values during the third minute of rest preceding the test in normoxia (NORMO) and in hypoxia with FiO2 at 13.5% (HYPO). N = 12.
| NORMO | HYPO | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SO2 (%) | 97.33 ± 1.36 | 98.04 ± 1.25 | 0.1840 | |
| HR (bpm) | 88.92 ± 14.77 | 80.58 ± 9.98 | 0.0855 | |
| MAP (mmHg) | 89.75 ± 4.55 | 85.83 ± 4.91 | 0.2106 | |
| PEP (ms) | 137.90 ± 19.27 | 135.50 ± 24.16 | 0.7176 | |
| VET (ms) | 238.02 ± 25.17 | 237.85 ± 38.04 | 0.9876 | |
| DT (ms) | 261.53 ± 55.57 | 347.99 ± 82.60 | 0.0148 | |
| ESV (ml) | 37.66 ± 12.83 | 39.27 ± 15.88 | 0.9828 | |
| EDV (ml) | 120.81 ± 17.89 | 120.19 ± 21.82 | 0.9135 | |
| EF (%) | 68.87 ± 9.14 | 67.85 ± 9.06 | 0.5927 | |
| SV (ml) | 83.13 ± 15.08 | 80.91 ± 13.85 | 0.5244 | |
| Evel (cm·s−1) | 54.47 ± 10.69 | 62.81 ± 14.54 | 0.0325 | |
| Avel (cm·s−1) | 62.05 ± 13.41 | 50.53 ± 7.87 | 0.0036 | |
| E/A | 0.91 ± 0.23 | 1.28 ± 0.38 | 0.0014 | |
| Em (cm·s−1) | 8.44 ± 2.36 | 9.14 ± 3.25 | 0.5695 | |
| Am (cm·s−1) | 8.22 ± 2.33 | 7.06 ± 1.46 | 0.1959 | |
| Em/Am | 1.09 ± 0.40 | 1.37 ± 0.54 | 0.0767 | |
| Sm (cm·s−1) | 10.19 ± 2.07 | 9.86 ± 1.52 | 0.6189 | |
| Evel/Em | 6.82 ± 1.60 | 7.48 ± 2.15 | 0.3926 | |
Figure 1Scatter plot graphs of levels of blood O2 saturation (SO2, panel A), heart rate (HR, panel B), mean arterial pressure (MAP, panel C), pre-ejection period (PEP, panel D), ventricular ejection time (VET, panel E), and diastolic time (DT, panel F) during the recovery from sessions of exercise in normoxia (NORMO) and in normobaric hypoxia with a FiO2 of 13.5% (HYPO). N = 12. *p < 0.05 vs. NORMO test.
Figure 2Scatter plot graphs of levels of end-systolic volume (ESV, panel A), end-diastolic volume (EDV, panel B), ejection fraction (EF, panel C), and stroke volume (SV, panel D) during the recovery from sessions of exercise in normoxia (NORMO) and in normobaric hypoxia with a FiO2 of 13.5% (HYPO). N = 12.
Figure 3Scatter plot graphs of levels of early transmitral filling peak velocity (Evel, panel A), late transmitral filling peak velocity (Avel, panel B), their ratio (E/A, panel C), and early diastolic mitral valve motion velocity (Em, panel D) during the recovery from sessions of exercise in normoxia (NORMO) and in normobaric hypoxia with a FiO2 of 13.5% (HYPO). N = 12. *p < 0.05 vs. NORMO test.
Figure 4Scatter plot graphs of levels of late diastolic mitral valve motion velocity (Am, panel A), ratio between early and late diastolic mitral valve motion velocities (Em/Am, panel B), systolic myocardial velocity (Sm, panel C), and ratio between early transmitral filling peak and early mitral valve diastolic velocities (Evel/Em, panel D) during the recovery from sessions of exercise in normoxia (NORMO) and in normobaric hypoxia with a FiO2 of 13.5% (HYPO). N = 12. *p < 0.05 vs. NORMO test.