| Literature DB >> 33967763 |
Kaiqiang Sun1, Jian Zhu1, Yi Deng2, Ximing Xu1, Fanqi Kong1, Xiaofei Sun1, Le Huan1, Changzhen Ren3, Jingchuan Sun1, Jiangang Shi1.
Abstract
Osteolytic bone disease is a condition of imbalanced bone homeostasis, characterized mainly by excessive bone-resorptive activity, which could predical">spose these populations, such as the old and postmenopausal <cal">span class="Species">women, to developing high risk of skeletal fragility and fracture. The nature of bone homeostasis is the coordination between the osteoblasts (OBs) and osteoclasts (OCs). Abnormal activation of osteoclasts (OCs) could compromise the bone homeostasis, constantly followed by a clutch of osteolytic diseases, including postmenopausal osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis. Thus, it is imperatively urgent to explore effective medical interventions for patients. The traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) gamabufotalin (CS-6) is a newly identified natural product from Chansu and has been utilized for oncologic therapies owing to its good clinical efficacy with less adverse events. Previous study suggested that CS-6 could be a novel anti-osteoporotic agent. Nevertheless, whether CS-6 suppresses RANK-(receptor activator of nuclear factor-κ B ligand)/TRAF6 (TNF receptor-associated factor 6)-mediated downstream signaling activation in OCs, as well as the effects of CS-6 on OC differentiation in vivo, remains elusive. Therefore, in this present study, we aimed to explore the biological effects of CS-6 on osteoclastogenesis and RANKL-induced activation of related signaling pathways, and further to examine the potential therapeutic application in estrogen-deficient bone loss in the mice model. The results of in vitro experiment showed that CS-6 can inhibit RANKL-induced OC formation and the ability of bone resorption in a dose-dependent manner at both the early and late stages of osteoclastogenesis. The gene expression of OC-related key genes such as tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), CTSK, DC-STAMP, MMP9, and β3 integrin was evidently reduced. In addition, CS-6 could mitigate the systemic estrogen-dependent bone loss and pro-inframammary cytokines in mice in vivo. The molecular mechanism analysis suggested that CS-6 can suppress RANKL/TRAF6-induced early activation of NF-κB and ERK/MAPK signaling pathways, which consequently suppressed the transcription activity of c-Fos and NFATc1. Taken together, this present study provided ample evidence that CS-6 has the promise to become a therapeutic candidate in treating osteolytic conditions mediated by elevated OC formation and bone resorption.Entities:
Keywords: ERK/MAPK; OVX model; TRAF6; gamabufotalin; osteoclast; osteoporosis; receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand
Year: 2021 PMID: 33967763 PMCID: PMC8104077 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.629968
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
FIGURE 1Chemical structure and cytotoxicity of gamabufotalin (CS-6) on osteoclast precursor cells (bone marrow–derived monocyte–macrophage (BMM) lineage). (A, B) Chemical structure of CS-6. (C–E) Cell viability of BMMs as evaluated by CCK-8 assay following treatment with or without indicated concentrations of CS-6 at the time point of (C) 24, (D) 48, and (E) 96 h, respectively. Values were presented as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 5); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
FIGURE 2CS-6 inhibited RANKL-induced OC differentiation in vitro in both the early and late stages of osteoclastogenesis. (A) The illustration of experimental design regarding early and late stimulation by CS-6. (B) Representative images of TRAP staining–positive OCs stimulated by RANKL (50 ng/ml) with indicated concentrations of CS-6 for 5–7 days. The (C) number and cell spread area (D) of TRAP+ multinucleated OCs were shown as graphs. (E) Representative images of TRAP staining–positive OCs stimulated with RANKL (50 ng/ml) for 3 days prior to indicated concentrations of CS-6. The (F) number and cell spread area (G) of TRAP+ multinucleated OCs were presented as graphs. Values were shown as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
FIGURE 3CS-6 suppresses the formation of F-actin ring and bone resorption of OCs. (A) Representative images of F-actin (Green) formed by OCs stimulated by RANKL (50 ng/ml) with indicated concentrations of CS-6 (100 nM) for 5–7 days. (B) The average number and area of F-actin ring. (C) Representative fluorescence images of actin-stained BMM-derived OCs stimulated with RANKL (50 ng/ml) for 3 days prior to indicated concentrations of CS-6 (100 nM). (D) The average number and area of F-actin ring. (E) Representative images of bone resorption pits (white area marked by black arrow) by mature OCs stimulated by RANKL (50 ng/ml) with indicated concentrations of CS-6 (100 nM) for 5–7 days and quantified graph. (F) Representative images of bone resorption pits (white area marked by black arrow) by mature OCs stimulated by RANKL (50 ng/ml) for 3 days prior to indicated concentrations of CS-6 (100 nM) and quantified graph. Values presented as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
FIGURE 4CS-6 suppresses RANKL-mediated marker genes expression in osteoclastogenesis. (A, B) The relative mRNA expression of OC-related genes (c-Fos, TRAP, CTSK, MMP-9, DC-STAMP, and β3-integrin) following CS-6 treatment was measured by qRT-PCR in the early (A) and late (B) stages of stimulation. Values presented as the mean ± standard deviation. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
FIGURE 5CS-6 attenuated RANKL-induced activation of NF-κB and ERK/MAPK signaling pathways. (A) Representative immunofluorescence images regarding the distribution of p65 in BMMs treated by RANKL (50 ng/ml) with or without CS-6 (100 nM) compared to the control group (30 ng/ml MCSF only). (B, C) The protein amount of p65 in cytoplasm and the nucleus was measured by Western blot and quantified, respectively. (D) BMM cells were pretreated with CS-6 (0, 50, 100, and 150 nM) for 3 h prior to stimulation with RANKL for additional 30 min. The total protein amount of the whole cell was determined by Western blot. The key proteins of NF-κB and MAPK pathways were shown. (E) The expression of total proteins was quantified by graphs. (F) (Left) The predicted best binding manner of CS6 in the ATP binding site of IKKβ generated with docking; hydrogen bonds were shown as purple lines. (Middle) Co-crystal structure of the interactions between CS6 and IKKβ; hydrogen bonds were displayed as red lines, and the participating amino acid residues (Thr23 and Asp103) were marked. (Right) MOLCAD representation of the molecular lipophilic potential surface upon the bioactive pose of CS6 in the ATP binding site of IKKβ. The blue denoted the hydrophilic, red for the lipophilic, and gray denoted neutral moiety. Values were presented as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
FIGURE 6CS-6 suppressed the protein expression of the OC marker genes. (A) The results of the protein expression of OC-related genes including TRAF6, MMP-9, c-Fos, and NFATc1 in BMM cells stimulated with RANKL (50 ng/ml) with indicated concentrations of CS-6 (100 nM) for 5–7 days compared to the control group (30 ng/ml MCSF only). (B) The expression of related protein was quantified. (C) The results of the protein expression of OC-related genes including TRAF6, MMP-9, c-Fos, and NFATc1 in BMM cells stimulated with RANKL (50 ng/ml) for 3 days prior to indicated concentrations of CS-6 (100 nM) compared to the control group (30 ng/ml MCSF only). (D) The expression of related protein was quantified. Values were presented as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
FIGURE 7Validation of the biological effect of CS-6 on osteoclastic bone resorption in systemic OVX-induced bone loss in vivo indicated by microstructure analysis. (A) Representative three-dimensional images of μCT for mouse femur from the sham group (mock operation with DMSO injection), OVX group (OVX with DMSO injection), positive group (OVX with β-estradiol injection, 5 mg/kg), low-dose group (OVX with low-dose CS-6, 0.5 mg/kg), and high-dose group (OVX with high-dose CS-6, 2.5 mg/kg). (B–E) Quantitative analyses of bone structural parameters, including trabecular bone mineral density (BMD, g/cc), bone surface area/total volume (BS/TV; %), bone volume/total volume (BV/TV; mm−1), trabecular number (Tb.N; mm−1), trabecular spacing (Tb.Sp, mm), and trabecular thickness (Tb.Th, mm) within the selected metaphyseal region were shown in the charts. Values were presented as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 5); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. # and NS indicated the comparison between the sham group and CS-6 treatment group, #p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001, p < 0.0001.
FIGURE 8Validation of the biological effect of CS-6 on osteoclastic bone resorption in systemic OVX-induced bone loss in vivo indicated by histological analysis. (A) Representative images of H&E staining within the selected metaphyseal region from the sham group (mock operation with DMSO injection), OVX group (OVX with DMSO injection), positive group (OVX with β-estradiol injection, 5 mg/kg), low-dose group (OVX with low-dose CS-6, 0.5 mg/kg), and high-dose group (OVX with high-dose CS-6, 2.5 mg/kg). (B) Representative images of TRAO staining within the selected metaphyseal region from the sham group (mock operation with DMSO injection), OVX group (OVX with DMSO injection), positive group (OVX with β-estradiol injection, 5 mg/kg), low-dose group (OVX with low-dose CS-6, 0.5 mg/kg), and high-dose group (OVX with high-dose CS-6, 2.5 mg/kg). (C) The area of the trabecular bone was quantified. (D) The number of TRAP+ cells per bone surface was quantified. (E–J) The serum level of pro-inflammatory cytokines and OC-related markers was presented. Values were presented as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 5); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. # and NS indicated the comparison between the sham group and CS-6 treatment group, #p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001, #### p < 0.0001.
FIGURE 9Illustration of the potential mechanism concluded by this study. The inhibitory effect of CS-6 on functional OC formation may be in part ascribed to the inhibition of NF-kB and ERK/MAPK signaling via lessening the binding of TRAF6 to RANK and consequently the activation of c-Fos and NFATc1. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.