| Literature DB >> 33967606 |
Jingwei Wang1, Fengxiao Dong1, Hui Su1, Licun Zhu1, Sujun Shao1, Jing Wu1, Hong Liu1.
Abstract
Background: Recently, an increasing number of studies have focused on the extragastrointestinal effects of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), including metabolic syndrome, fatty liver, and rheumatic and skin diseases. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a common chronic disease worldwide that conveys a heavy economic burden on patients and society. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between H. pylori and NAFLD and to identify potential influencing factors.Entities:
Keywords: Female; H. pylori infection; Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Year: 2021 PMID: 33967606 PMCID: PMC8100637 DOI: 10.7150/ijms.50748
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Med Sci ISSN: 1449-1907 Impact factor: 3.738
Figure 1Flow diagram of study participants. Flow chart of selection of the included subjects.
Baseline characteristics of the patients according to the H. pylori infection statue
| Total | H. pylori + | H. pylori - | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 37.19±0.170 | 37.04±0.289 | 37.28±0.210 | 0.452 |
| Female | 35.9% | 33.5% | 37.2% | 0.107 |
| Male | 64.1% | 66.5% | 62.8% | |
| SP | 114.26±0.330 | 114.68±0.574 | 114.02±0.401 | 0.476 |
| BP | 68.400±0.244 | 68.580±0.417 | 68.300±0.301 | 0.894 |
| BMI | 23.165±0.078 | 23.229±0.126 | 23.114±0.099 | 0.300 |
| WHR | 0.873±0.001 | 0.873±0.002 | 0.873±0.002 | 0.533 |
| ALT | 22.861±0.207 | 23.087±0.606 | 22.732±0.470 | 0.260 |
| AST | 19.856±0.207 | 20.255±0.355 | 19.628±0.255 | 0.156 |
| UA | 360.730±2.099 | 366.520±3.427 | 357.440±2.650 | |
| TC | 4.562±0.019 | 4.559±0.032 | 4.563±0.023 | 0.836 |
| TG | 1.345±0.022 | 1.410±0.044 | 1.308±0.025 | 0.210 |
| HDL-C | 1.306±0.007 | 1.285±0.010 | 1.318±0.008 | |
| LDL-C | 2.408±0.013 | 2.409±0.227 | 2.408±0.017 | 0.985 |
| GLU | 4.714±0.020 | 4.760±0.038 | 4.687±0.223 | 0.348 |
| ALP | 59.660±0.454 | 60.020±0.630 | 59.450±0.615 | 0.188 |
| GGT | 24.620±0.607 | 26.060±1.350 | 23.800±0.561 | 0.397 |
| PGI (ng/ml) | 48.630±24.077 | 55.317±20.816 | 44.819±24.971 | |
| PG2 (ng/ml) | 8.361±6.275 | 11.051±6.151 | 6.827±5.815 | |
| PG1/PG2 | 6.437±1.800 | 5.633±1.810 | 6.895±1.626 | |
| proGRP (pg/mL) | 28.080±0.210 | 28.194±0.375 | 28.015±0.252 | 0.952 |
| Ghb (%) | 5.379±0.013 | 5.406±0.025 | 5.364±0.134 | 0.676 |
Abbreviations as in Table 1 and Table 2; OR, odds ratio;
Bold indicates statistically significant values.
BMI, Body Mass Index; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio; TC, total cholesterol; Ghb, glycosylated hemoglobin; TG, triglyceride; UA, uric acid; AST, Aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, Alanine aminotransferase; Ca, calcium; DP, diastolic blood pressure; SP, Systolic pressure; Hb, hemoglobin; HDL-C, High-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; UA, Uric acid; GLU, glucose; PG, pepsinogen; proGRP, Pro-gastrin-releasing Peptide; ALP, alkaline phosphatase;GGT, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase.
The relationship between the H. pylori infection and the NAFLD level in different genders
| H. pylori infection (-) | H. pylori infection (+) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 418 (92.9%) | 202 (87.4%) | |
| mild NAFLD | 19 (4.2%) | 13 (5.6%) | |
| moderate NAFLD | 13 (2.9%) | 15 (6.5%) | |
| severe NAFLD | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.4%) | |
| Normal | 485 (63.9%) | 288 (62.9%) | 0.795 |
| mild NAFLD | 168 (22.1%) | 106 (23.1%) | |
| moderate NAFLD | 93 (12.3%) | 53 (11.6%) | |
| severe NAFLD | 13 (1.7%) | 11 (2.4%) |
Bold indicates statistically significant values.
The relationship between NAFLD statue and the potential biomarker
| Characteristics | Model 1† | Model 2‡ | Characteristics | Model 1† | Model 2‡ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | ||
| Q1 | 0.041 (0.012,0.133) | 0.378 (0.285,0.503) | Q1 | 0.032 (0.016,0.064) | 0.201 (0.151,0.268) |
| Q2 | 0 | 0 | Q2 | 0 | 0 |
| Q1 | 0.284 (0.047,1.726) | 0.719 (0.352,1.467) | Q1 | 0.061 (0.007,0.553) | 0.656 (0.313,1.376) |
| Q2 | 0 | 0 | Q2 | 0 | 0 |
| 0.172 | 0.364 | 0.265 | |||
| Q1 | 0.359 (0.176,0.733) | 1.758 (0.607,5.099) | Q1 | 0.087 (0.045,0.169) | 0.165 (0.076,0.355) |
| Q2 | 0 | 0 | Q2 | 0 | 0 |
| 0.299 | |||||
| Q1 | 5.830 (2.959,11.484) | 0.309 (0.110,0.868) | Q1 | 0.605 (0.154,2.377) | 0.384 (0.122,1.208) |
| Q2 | 0 | 0 | Q2 | 0 | 0 |
| 0.472 | 0.102 | ||||
| Q1 | 0.086 (0.023,0.321) | 0.197 (0.041,0.942) | Q1 | 0.711 (0.177,2.849) | 0.342 (0.096,1.219) |
| Q2 | 0 | 0 | Q2 | 0 | 0 |
| 0.630 | 0.098 | ||||
| Q1 | 0.138 (0.075,0.252) | 0.240 (0.120,0.479) | Q1 | 0.124 (0.030,0.514) | 0.144 (0.035,0.599) |
| Q2 | 0 | 0 | Q2 | 0 | 0 |
| Q1 | 0.409 (0.078,2.158) | 2.497 (0.294,21.221) | Q1 | 0.057 (0.017,0.195) | 0.076 (0.016,0.357) |
| Q2 | 0 | 0 | Q2 | 0 | 0 |
| 0.292 | 0.402 | ||||
| Q1 | 0.069 (0.014,0.345) | 0.420 (0.045,3.896) | Q1 | 1.857 (1.064,3.245) | 1.597 (0.786,3.245) |
| Q2 | 0 | 0 | Q2 | 0 | 0 |
| 0.445 | 0.196 | ||||
| Q1 | 1.252 (0.721,2.175) | 0.962 (0.432,2.140) | Q1 | 1.266 (0.736,2.179) | 1.212 (0.628,2.335) |
| Q2 | 0 | 0 | Q2 | 0 | 0 |
| 0.424 | 0.923 | 0.393 | 0.567 | ||
| Q1 | 1.266 (0.736,2.179) | 1.212 (0.628,2.335) | Q1 | 0.473 (0.274,0.817) | - |
| Q2 | 0 | 0 | Q2 | 0 | |
| 0.393 | 0.567 | ||||
Abbreviations as in Table 1; OR, odds ratio;
The model 1† only used age as a covariable to the logistic regression models;
In the model 2 ‡, the variables were divided into four groups: basic information (WHR, BMI, SP, BP); metabolic index (TC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, GLU, Ghb, UA), Liver related indicators (ALP, GGT, ALT) and gastrin related indexes (PGI, PGII, PGI/PGII, proPG). When analyzed one of the variables, other variables in the same group and age were included in the model as covariables;
Bold indicates statistically significant.
Mediation analysis of the association between H.pylori status and the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)
| OR | 95%CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Model 0, aHRa (95% CI) | 0.473 | 0.274, 0.817 | 0.007 |
| Model 1, aHRa (95% CI) | 0.517 | 0.274, 0.974 | 0.041 |
| Model 2, aHRa (95% CI) | 0.395 | 0.164, 0.949 | 0.038 |
| Model 3, aHRa (95% CI) | 0.395 | 0104, 0.807 | 0.018 |
| Model 4, aHRa (95% CI) | 0.221 | 0.067, 0.736 | 0.014 |
Model 0: adjusted for age;
Model 1: Model 0 plus adjustment for fasting blood glucose, Ghb, TC, TG, LDL-C, HDL-C, UA;
Model 2: Model 1 plus adjustment for BMI, WHR, SBP, and DBP;
Model 3: Model 2 plus adjustment for AST, ALT, and GGT;
Model 4: Model 3 plus adjustment for PGI, PGII, PGI/PGII, proPG.
Definition of NAFLD risk group and the relationship between H. pylori infection and NAFLD in risk and non-risk group