Comparison of classic and needle arthroscopy to diagnose canine medial shoulder instability: 31 cases.

This retrospective study compared surgery time, anesthesia time, and costs recorded with classic arthroscopy or needle arthroscopy when diagnosing canine medial shoulder instability. Signalment, examination findings, diagnostics, anesthesia time, surgery time, treatment, invoices, and complications were reported. All cases (classic arthroscopy, 14 cases; needle arthroscopy, 17 cases) were diagnosed with medial shoulder instability. Anesthesia times, surgery times, and invoices were statistically compared for classic and needle arthroscopy (P < 0.05). No significant differences were reported for surgery time (P = 0.13) but existed for anesthesia time (35 minutes shorter with needle arthroscopy; P < 0.0001) and invoice (38% lower with needle arthroscopy; P < 0.0001). No complications were recorded by the time of last direct follow-up, which was at a mean of 12.4 weeks after surgery. Needle arthroscopy offers an alternative, safe technique to reliably diagnose canine medial shoulder instability. Shorter anesthesia times and lower costs to the client may be advantages of needle over classic arthroscopy. Copyright and/or publishing rights held by the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association.