Shelly Palmer1, Cameron Herritt2, Leslie Cunningham-Sabo3, Katerina S Stylianou4, Melissa Pflugh Prescott5. 1. Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL. 2. Weld County School District 6 Nutrition Services, Greeley, CO. 3. Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO. 4. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 5. Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL. Electronic address: mpp22@illinois.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Identify types of food packaging used in school nutrition programs and competing priorities, barriers, and facilitators for sustainable packaging waste use and recovery. DESIGN: Qualitative interviews (n = 20) and structured kitchen observations were conducted. SETTING: Data were collected from 3 school districts in Northern Colorado. PARTICIPANTS: Three nutrition program directors, 14 kitchen managers, and 3 sustainability staff. PHENOMENON OF INTEREST: Barriers and facilitators for sustainable food packaging waste practices among school nutrition programs. ANALYSIS: Interviews were recorded and transcribed, followed by inductive content analysis to identify themes. RESULTS: Commonly used food packaging included cardboard, aluminum, paper, plastic, and styrofoam. Four competing priorities were identified as impacting school nutrition programs' ability to reduce or recover food packaging: serving line speed, labor, food quality, and cost. One key barrier was that school staff had difficulty understanding the total system impact of their food packaging use and recovery decisions. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Food packaging is commonly used in school nutrition programs, and participants felt that its use offered key benefits, such as facilitating faster serving lines. More research is needed to quantify the direct and indirect impacts of packaging waste reduction and recovery in school nutrition programs.
OBJECTIVE: Identify types of food packaging used in school nutrition programs and competing priorities, barriers, and facilitators for sustainable packaging waste use and recovery. DESIGN: Qualitative interviews (n = 20) and structured kitchen observations were conducted. SETTING: Data were collected from 3 school districts in Northern Colorado. PARTICIPANTS: Three nutrition program directors, 14 kitchen managers, and 3 sustainability staff. PHENOMENON OF INTEREST: Barriers and facilitators for sustainable food packaging waste practices among school nutrition programs. ANALYSIS: Interviews were recorded and transcribed, followed by inductive content analysis to identify themes. RESULTS: Commonly used food packaging included cardboard, aluminum, paper, plastic, and styrofoam. Four competing priorities were identified as impacting school nutrition programs' ability to reduce or recover food packaging: serving line speed, labor, food quality, and cost. One key barrier was that school staff had difficulty understanding the total system impact of their food packaging use and recovery decisions. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Food packaging is commonly used in school nutrition programs, and participants felt that its use offered key benefits, such as facilitating faster serving lines. More research is needed to quantify the direct and indirect impacts of packaging waste reduction and recovery in school nutrition programs.
Authors: Jessica Heiges; Danielle L Lee; Laura Vollmer; Kate Wobbekind; Hannah R Thompson; Wendi Gosliner; Kristine A Madsen; Kate O'Neill; Lorrene D Ritchie Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-05 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Shelly Palmer; Jessica Jarick Metcalfe; Brenna Ellison; Toni Kay Wright; Lindsey Sadler; Katherine Hinojosa; Jennifer McCaffrey; Melissa Pflugh Prescott Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-14 Impact factor: 3.390