Literature DB >> 33966735

Clinical efficacy analysis of different therapeutic methods in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy.

Yan Wu1, Lei-Fang Sun1, Ya-Nan Si1, Xiao-Li Luan1, Yong-Mei Gao2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical efficacy of five therapeutic strategies in patients with CSP.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 135 CSP patients were included and divided into five groups based on the treatment they received, including transvaginal resection (Group A), laparoscopic resection (Group B), uterine arterial embolization (UAE) combined with hysteroscopic curettage (Group C), UAE combined with uterine curettage (Group D), and hysteroscopic curettage (Group E). To investigate the clinical efficacy of these strategies, intraoperative bleeding, serum β-hCG levels and recovery time, menstruation recovery time, hormone levels at 1 month after treatment.
RESULTS: Patients in group A had the lowest postoperative serum β-hCG levels, and the shortest recovery times of both serum β-hCG and menstruation, followed by patients in group B. Group C and D had small amount of blood loss. The hospital stays and costs were low in group E. In addition, the sex hormone levels showed no significant difference among the five groups.
CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that resection surgery and UAE have good curative effects, but high hospital costs in CSP treatment. The selection of an optimal treatment regimen for CSP should be carried out based on specific conditions of the patients.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean scar pregnancy; Hysteroscopy; Laparoscopic resection; Transvaginal resection; Uterine arterial embolization

Year:  2021        PMID: 33966735     DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2021.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1028-4559            Impact factor:   1.705


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of scar pregnancy.

Authors:  Zhulan Huang; Jinghua Liu; Zongyu Jing; Limei Lin; Xiaoyun Li
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.340

Review 2.  Focus on the Primary Prevention of Intrauterine Adhesions: Current Concept and Vision.

Authors:  Wen-Ling Lee; Chia-Hao Liu; Min Cheng; Wen-Hsun Chang; Wei-Min Liu; Peng-Hui Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Uterine Artery Embolization Combined with Subsequent Suction Evacuation as Low-Risk Treatment for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.

Authors:  Roxana Bohiltea; Ionita Ducu; Bianca Mihai; Ana-Maria Iordache; Bogdan Dorobat; Emilia Maria Vladareanu; Stefan-Marian Iordache; Alexia-Teodora Bohiltea; Nicolae Bacalbasa; Cristiana Eugenia Ana Grigorescu; Valentin Varlas
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.