Background and Purpose: Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are represented by small areas of hemosiderin deposition, detected on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and found in ≈23% of the cognitively normal population over age of 60 years. CMBs predict risk of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke. They correlate with increased cardiovascular mortality. In this article, we sought to determine in a population-based study whether antithrombotic medications correlate with CMBs and, if present, whether the association was direct or mediated by another variable. Methods: The study consisted of 1253 participants from the population-based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging who underwent T2* gradient-recalled echo magnetic resonance imaging. We tested the relationship between antithrombotic medications and CMB presence and location, using multivariable logistic-regression models. Ordinal logistic models tested the relationship between antithrombotics and CMB frequency. Using structural equation models, we assessed the effect of antithrombotic medications on presence/absence of CMBs and count of CMBs in the CMB-positive group, after considering the effects of age, sex, vascular risk factors, amyloid load by positron emission tomography, and apoE. Results: Two hundred ninety-five participants (26.3%) had CMBs. Among 678 participants taking only antiplatelet medications, 185 (27.3%) had CMBs. Among 95 participants taking only an anticoagulant, 43 (45.3%) had CMBs. Among 44 participants taking an anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy, 21 (48.8%) had CMBs. Anticoagulants correlated with the presence and frequency of CMBs, whereas antiplatelet agents were not. Structural equation models showed that predictors for presence/absence of CMBs included older age at magnetic resonance imaging, male sex, and anticoagulant use. Predictors of CMB count in the CMB-positive group were male sex and amyloid load. Conclusions: Anticoagulant use correlated with presence of CMBs in the general population. Amyloid positron emission tomography correlated with the count of CMBs in the CMB-positive group.
Background and Purpose: Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are represented by small areas of hemosiderin deposition, detected on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and found in ≈23% of the cognitively normal population over age of 60 years. CMBs predict risk of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke. They correlate with increased cardiovascular mortality. In this article, we sought to determine in a population-based study whether antithrombotic medications correlate with CMBs and, if present, whether the association was direct or mediated by another variable. Methods: The study consisted of 1253 participants from the population-based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging who underwent T2* gradient-recalled echo magnetic resonance imaging. We tested the relationship between antithrombotic medications and CMB presence and location, using multivariable logistic-regression models. Ordinal logistic models tested the relationship between antithrombotics and CMB frequency. Using structural equation models, we assessed the effect of antithrombotic medications on presence/absence of CMBs and count of CMBs in the CMB-positive group, after considering the effects of age, sex, vascular risk factors, amyloid load by positron emission tomography, and apoE. Results: Two hundred ninety-five participants (26.3%) had CMBs. Among 678 participants taking only antiplatelet medications, 185 (27.3%) had CMBs. Among 95 participants taking only an anticoagulant, 43 (45.3%) had CMBs. Among 44 participants taking an anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy, 21 (48.8%) had CMBs. Anticoagulants correlated with the presence and frequency of CMBs, whereas antiplatelet agents were not. Structural equation models showed that predictors for presence/absence of CMBs included older age at magnetic resonance imaging, male sex, and anticoagulant use. Predictors of CMB count in the CMB-positive group were male sex and amyloid load. Conclusions: Anticoagulant use correlated with presence of CMBs in the general population. Amyloid positron emission tomography correlated with the count of CMBs in the CMB-positive group.
Authors: Saloua Akoudad; Sirwan K L Darweesh; Maarten J G Leening; Peter J Koudstaal; Albert Hofman; Aad van der Lugt; Bruno H Stricker; M Arfan Ikram; Meike W Vernooij Journal: Stroke Date: 2014-10-14 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Jennifer L St Sauver; Brandon R Grossardt; Barbara P Yawn; L Joseph Melton; Walter A Rocca Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2011-03-23 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Val J Lowe; Bradley J Kemp; Clifford R Jack; Matthew Senjem; Stephen Weigand; Maria Shiung; Glenn Smith; David Knopman; Bradley Boeve; Brian Mullan; Ronald C Petersen Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2009-05-14 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: M W Vernooij; A van der Lugt; M A Ikram; P A Wielopolski; W J Niessen; A Hofman; G P Krestin; M M B Breteler Journal: Neurology Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Meike W Vernooij; Mendel D M Haag; Aad van der Lugt; Albert Hofman; Gabriel P Krestin; Bruno H Stricker; Monique M B Breteler Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2009-04-13
Authors: Rosebud O Roberts; Yonas E Geda; David S Knopman; Ruth H Cha; V Shane Pankratz; Bradley F Boeve; Robert J Ivnik; Eric G Tangalos; Ronald C Petersen; Walter A Rocca Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2008-02-07 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: M Edip Gurol; J Alex Becker; Panagiotis Fotiadis; Grace Riley; Kristin Schwab; Keith A Johnson; Steven M Greenberg Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-09-07 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Duncan Wilson; Gareth Ambler; Clare Shakeshaft; Martin M Brown; Andreas Charidimou; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Gregory Y H Lip; Hannah Cohen; Gargi Banerjee; Henry Houlden; Mark J White; Tarek A Yousry; Kirsty Harkness; Enrico Flossmann; Nigel Smyth; Louise J Shaw; Elizabeth Warburton; Keith W Muir; Hans Rolf Jäger; David J Werring Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2018-05-16 Impact factor: 59.935
Authors: Stuart J McCarter; Timothy G Lesnick; Val J Lowe; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Scott A Przybelski; Alicia Algeciras-Schimnich; Vijay K Ramanan; Clifford R Jack; Ronald C Petersen; David S Knopman; Bradley F Boeve; Kejal Kantarci; Prashanthi Vemuri; Michelle M Mielke; Jonathan Graff-Radford Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2022 Impact factor: 4.160