Meg Fluharty1, Feifei Bu1, Andrew Steptoe1, Daisy Fancourt2. 1. Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, UK. 2. Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, UK. Electronic address: d.fancourt@ucl.ac.uk.
Abstract
RATIONALE: The negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health is well evidenced. However, there is little research on how individuals' coping strategies were related to changes in mental health over time. METHODS: The current study used data from the COVID-19 Social Study in the United Kingdom (N = 26,505) to explore whether coping strategies (problem-focused, emotion-focused, avoidant, and socially-supportive) were associated with (i) better mental health as lockdown was introduced, and (ii) faster recovery over time. RESULTS: People with greater use of problem-focused, avoidant, and supportive coping displayed more mental health symptoms, while greater use of emotion-focused coping was associated with fewer mental health symptoms. Symptoms decreased over time for all coping strategies, but only socially-supportive coping was associated with a faster decrease in anxiety and depressive symptoms, indicating a potential protective effect of social support on psychological distress. CONCLUSIONS: Problem-, avoidant- and emotion-focused coping strategies were not associated with faster improvements in mental health. Suggesting the adoption of one of these coping styles in itself is not necessarily a driver of improvements in mental health; rather, specific attributes of the behaviours expressed as part of this coping style appear to be important in and of themselves.
RATIONALE: The negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health is well evidenced. However, there is little research on how individuals' coping strategies were related to changes in mental health over time. METHODS: The current study used data from the COVID-19 Social Study in the United Kingdom (N = 26,505) to explore whether coping strategies (problem-focused, emotion-focused, avoidant, and socially-supportive) were associated with (i) better mental health as lockdown was introduced, and (ii) faster recovery over time. RESULTS:People with greater use of problem-focused, avoidant, and supportive coping displayed more mental health symptoms, while greater use of emotion-focused coping was associated with fewer mental health symptoms. Symptoms decreased over time for all coping strategies, but only socially-supportive coping was associated with a faster decrease in anxiety and depressive symptoms, indicating a potential protective effect of social support on psychological distress. CONCLUSIONS: Problem-, avoidant- and emotion-focused coping strategies were not associated with faster improvements in mental health. Suggesting the adoption of one of these coping styles in itself is not necessarily a driver of improvements in mental health; rather, specific attributes of the behaviours expressed as part of this coping style appear to be important in and of themselves.
Authors: Raquel Lara; Martha Fernández-Daza; Sara Zabarain-Cogollo; María Angustias Olivencia-Carrión; Manuel Jiménez-Torres; María Demelza Olivencia-Carrión; Adelaida Ogallar-Blanco; Débora Godoy-Izquierdo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-08-04 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Elisa Delvecchio; Mireia Orgilés; Alexandra Morales; José Pedro Espada; Rita Francisco; Marta Pedro; Claudia Mazzeschi Journal: J Appl Dev Psychol Date: 2022-01-25
Authors: Michelle T Pedersen; Thea O Andersen; Amy Clotworthy; Andreas K Jensen; Katrine Strandberg-Larsen; Naja H Rod; Tibor V Varga Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 3.630