| Literature DB >> 33964921 |
Zhongyi Jiang1, Qianwei Jiang1, Xu Fang1, Pusen Wang1, Weitao Que1, Hao Li1, Yang Yu1, Xueni Liu1, Chunguang Wang2, Lin Zhong3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Complement component(C7) gene has been shown to influence the prognosis in Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. The association between C7 and HCC recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), however, is still unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the donor and recipient C7 gene polymorphisms are related to HCC recurrence after OLT in the Han Chinese population.Entities:
Keywords: C7 polymorphism; Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence; Orthotopic liver transplantation; Prognosis
Year: 2021 PMID: 33964921 PMCID: PMC8106183 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08269-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Demographic, clinical and pathological characteristics of the two groups of the HCC patients
| Parameter | Recurrence group | Non-recurrence group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recipient age | 48(21–67) | 49.5(33–62) | 0.811 |
| ≥ 50 | 13(44.8%) | 22(50.0%) | |
| <50 | 16(55.2%) | 22(50.0%) | |
| Recipient gender | 1.000 | ||
| Male | 25(86.2%) | 39(88.6%) | |
| female | 4(13.8%) | 5(11.4%) | |
| Hepatitis B | 0.207 | ||
| Yes | 25(86.2)%) | 42(95.5%) | |
| No | 4(13.8%) | 2(4.5%) | |
| Cirrhosis | 0.154 | ||
| Yes | 20(69.0%) | 37(84.1%) | |
| No | 9(31.0%) | 7(15.9%) | |
| Milan criteria | 0.000 | ||
| In | 2(6.9%) | 29(65.9%) | |
| Out | 27(93.1%) | 15(34.1%) | |
| TNM stage | 0.000 | ||
| 1–2 | 12(41.4%) | 38(86.4%) | |
| 3–4 | 17(58.6%) | 6(13.6%) | |
| Tumor size (cm) | 0.000 | ||
| > 5 | 26(89.7%) | 18(40.9%) | |
| ≤ 5 | 3(10.3%) | 26(59.1%) | |
| Multinodular type | 0.219 | ||
| YES | 15(51.7%) | 30(68.2%) | |
| NO | 14(48.3%) | 14(31.8%) | |
| Pre-OLT serum AFP level | 0.165 | ||
| ≤ 400 (ng/ml) | 19(65.5%) | 36(81.8%) | |
| > 400 (ng/ml) | 10(34.5%) | 8(18.2%) | |
| Microvascular invasion | 0.000 | ||
| Yes | 14(48.3%) | 2(4.5%) | |
| No | 15(51.7%) | 42(95.5%) | |
| Macrovascular invasion | 0.425 | ||
| YES | 4(57.1%) | 3(42.9%) | |
| NO | 25(37.9%) | 41(62.1%) |
Abbreviations
HCC hepatocellular carcinoma, TNM tumor node metastasis, AFP alpha-fetoprotein, OLT orthotopic liver transplantation
Recipient and donor C7 genotype distribution and the association with HCC recurrence
| Genotype distribution, n (%) | HWE | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recurrence ( | Non-recurrence ( | |||
| Recipient rs9292795 | ||||
| AA | 1(3.4%) | 8(18.2%) | ||
| AT | 8(27.6%) | 20(45.5%) | 0.016 | 0.858 |
| TT | 20(69.0%) | 16(36.4%) | ||
| Recessive model | ||||
| AA | 1(3.4%) | 8(18.2) | ||
| AT/TT | 28(96.6%) | 36(81.8%) | 0.078 | |
| Dominant model | ||||
| TT | 20(69.0%) | 16(36.4%) | 0.009 | |
| AA/AT | 9(31.0%) | 28(63.6%) | ||
| Additive model | ||||
| AT | 8(27.6%) | 20(45.5%) | ||
| AA/TT | 21 | 24 | 0.146 | |
| Donor rs9292795 | ||||
| AA | 3 (10.3%) | 4(9.1%) | ||
| AT | 16(55.2%) | 23(52.3%) | ||
| TT | 10(34.5%) | 17(38.6%) | 0.933 | 0.355 |
| Recessive model | ||||
| AA | 3(10.3%) | 4(9.1%) | ||
| AT/TT | 26(89.7%) | 40(90.9%) | 1.000 | |
| Dominant model | ||||
| TT | 10(34.5%) | 17(38.6%) | ||
| AA/AT | 19(65.5%) | 27(61.4%) | 0.087 | |
| Additive model | ||||
| AT | 16(55.2%) | 23(52.3%) | ||
| AA/TT | 13(44.8%) | 21(47.7%) | 1.000 | |
Abbreviations: HCC hepatocellular carcinoma, HWE Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium
Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors associated with HCC recurrence
| Factors | Odds ratio (95%CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| TNM stage (0 = stage 1–2, 1 = stage 3–4) | 8.302 [1.723–40.008] | 0.001 |
| Milan criteria(1 = out, 0 = in) | 26.100 [5.453–124.921] | 0.000 |
| Recipient rs9292795(1 = AA/AT,2 = TT) | 3.889 [1.433–10.551] | 0.008 |
Abbreviation: CI confidence interval
Fig. 1Expression of C7 in human tissue database. a Expression of C7 gene is lower in LIHC primary tumor(n = 371) than in normal tissue(n = 50). b Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival (OS) grouped by high C7 and low C7 levels
Prognostic factors associated with RFS and OS in the univariate Cox analysis
| Parameter | RFS, | OS, |
|---|---|---|
| Recipient age(<50/≥50) | 0.531 | 0.284 |
| Gender (Male/ Female) | 0.831 | 0.891 |
| Hepatitis B (yes/no) | 0.108 | 0.953 |
| Cirrhosis (yes/no) | 0.095 | 0.306 |
| Milan criteria (in/out) | 0.000* | 0.000* |
| TNM stage(1–2/3–4) | 0.000* | 0.000* |
| Tumor size (cm) (≤5/> 5) | 0.000* | 0.001* |
| Multinodular type (yes/no) | 0.111 | 0.172 |
| Microvascular invasion (yes/no) | 0.000* | 0.000 |
| Macrovascular invasion (yes/no) | 0.367 | 0.627 |
| serum AFP level(≤400/> 400) | 0.060 | 0.003* |
| Recipient rs9292795(TT vs AA/AT) | 0.005* | 0.037* |
| Recipient rs9292795(TT vs AA vs AT) | 0.014* | 0.047* |
| Donor rs9292795(TT vs AA/AT) | 0.825 | 0.927 |
| Donor rs9292795(TT vs AA vs AT) | 0.972 | 0.996 |
Abbreviations:
HCC hepatocellular carcinoma, TNM tumor node metastasis, AFP alpha-fetoprotein, RFS recurrence-free survival, OS overall survival, *P < 0.05
Fig. 2Kaplan–Meier survival estimates of a recurrence-free survival (RFS) and b overall survival (OS) between the different recipient genotypes (AA, AT, and TT) of the recipient
Fig. 3Kaplan–Meier survival estimates of a recurrence-free survival (RFS) and b overall survival (OS) between the different recipient genotype (AA, AT, and TT) of the donor
Prognostic factors associated with RFS and OS in the multivariate Cox regression analysis
| Hazard ratio (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|
| RFS | ||
| Milan criteria | 16.408 [3.869–69.592] | 0.000 |
| Recipient rs9292795(1 = TT,2 = AA/AT) | 3.672[1.574–8.566] | 0.003 |
| TNM stage(1 = 1-2stage,2 = 3-4stage) | 5.738[2.305–14.288] | 0.000 |
| OS | ||
| AFP | 3.085[1.012–9.408] | 0.048 |
| Milan criteria | 11.078[2.587–47.443] | 0.001 |
| Recipient rs9292795(1 = TT,2 = AA/AT) | 4.415[1.792–10.879] | 0.001 |
| TNM stage(1 = 1-2stage,2 = 3-4stage) | 10.318[3.016–35.294] | 0.000 |
Abbreviations:
CI confidence interval, TNM tumor node metastasis, AFP alpha-fetoprotein