| Literature DB >> 33964451 |
Paul Roepman1, Ewart de Bruijn2, Stef van Lieshout2, Lieke Schoenmaker2, Mirjam C Boelens3, Hendrikus J Dubbink4, Willemina R R Geurts-Giele4, Floris H Groenendijk4, Manon M H Huibers5, Mariëtte E G Kranendonk5, Margaretha G M Roemer6, Kris G Samsom3, Marloes Steehouwer7, Wendy W J de Leng5, Alexander Hoischen8, Bauke Ylstra6, Kim Monkhorst3, Jacobus J M van der Hoeven2, Edwin Cuppen9.
Abstract
Whole genome sequencing (WGS) using fresh-frozen tissue and matched blood samples from cancer patients may become the most complete genetic tumor test. With the increasing availability of small biopsies and the need to screen more number of biomarkers, the use of a single all-inclusive test is preferable over multiple consecutive assays. To meet high-quality diagnostics standards, we optimized and clinically validated WGS sample and data processing procedures, resulting in a technical success rate of 95.6% for fresh-frozen samples with sufficient (≥20%) tumor content. Independent validation of identified biomarkers against commonly used diagnostic assays showed a high sensitivity (recall; 98.5%) and precision (positive predictive value; 97.8%) for detection of somatic single-nucleotide variants and insertions and deletions (across 22 genes), and high concordance for detection of gene amplification (97.0%; EGFR and MET) as well as somatic complete loss (100%; CDKN2A/p16). Gene fusion analysis showed a concordance of 91.3% between DNA-based WGS and an orthogonal RNA-based gene fusion assay. Microsatellite (in)stability assessment showed a sensitivity of 100% with a precision of 94%, and virus detection (human papillomavirus), an accuracy of 100% compared with standard testing. In conclusion, whole genome sequencing has a >95% sensitivity and precision compared with routinely used DNA techniques in diagnostics, and all relevant mutation types can be detected reliably in a single assay.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33964451 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.04.011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mol Diagn ISSN: 1525-1578 Impact factor: 5.568