| Literature DB >> 33963911 |
Gabriel Broocks1, Lukas Meyer2, Reza Kabiri2, Helge C Kniep2, Rosalie McDonough2, Matthias Bechstein2, Noel van Horn2, Thomas Lindner2, Jan Sedlacik3, Bastian Cheng4, Götz Thomalla4, Gerhard Schön5, Jens Fiehler2, Uta Hanning2, Michael H Schönfeld2,6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Thrombus microfragmentation causing peripheral emboli (PE) during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) may modulate treatment effects, even in cases with successful reperfusion. This study aims to investigate whether intravenous alteplase is of potential benefit in reducing PE after successful MT.Entities:
Keywords: Infarction; Ischemia; Magnetic resonance imaging; Stroke; Thrombectomy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33963911 PMCID: PMC8523452 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07980-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Radiol ISSN: 0938-7994 Impact factor: 5.315
Fig. 1Example of six patients with ischemic cores (upper row) and peripheral emboli (lower rows) on the trace images of the high-resolution DWI
Overview of patients’ baseline characteristics, and comparison grouped by IV alteplase administration
| Baseline characteristics | All patients ( | IV alteplase ( | No IV alteplase ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age in years, median (IQR) | 71.5 (63–81) | 71.5 (66.75–81) | 71 (62–82.25) | 0.837 |
| Female sex, | 26 (46.4) | 10 (38.5) | 16 (53.3) | 0.266 |
| Atrial fibrillation, | 24 (42.9) | 12 (46.2) | 20 (66.7) | 0.122 |
| Admission NIHSS, median (IQR) | 13.5 (10–16.75) | 12.5 (10–17) | 14 (9.75–16.25) | 0.921 |
| Occlusion site, | ||||
| Tandem occlusion | 9 (16.1) | 3 (5.4) | 6 (10.7) | 0.481 |
| Terminal ICA | 12 (21.4) | 6 (10.7) | 6 (10.7) | 0.521 |
| MCA | 43 (76.8) | 19 (33.9) | 24 (42.9) | |
| ACA | 1 (1.8) | 1 (1.8) | 0 | |
| ASPECTS, median (IQR) | 8 (6–9) | 9 (6–10) | 8 (6–9) | 0.073 |
Fig. 2Box plots and means (red crosses) with 95% confidence interval (red whiskers) of numbers (light blue) and volume (dark blue) of peripheral emboli compared by patients treated with (n = 21) and without (n = 14) additional intravenous alteplase in patients with a time from symptom onset to reperfusion ≤ 6 h
Comparison of procedural and functional outcome, and imaging analysis between patients treated with and without intravenous alteplase
| Procedural and functional outcome | All patients ( | IV alteplase ( | No IV alteplase ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| eTICI (2b50/2b67/2c/3) | 7/17/12/20 | 4/8/4/10 | 3/9/8/10 | 0.740 |
| Time symptom onset to reperfusion in min, median (IQR) [ | 281.5 (230–465.5) | 255 (201–338.5) | 370 (249–574.5) | 0.022* |
| Time IV alteplase administration to reperfusion in min, median (IQR) | – | 148 (104.75–205.25) | – | - |
| mRS 90 days, median (IQR) | 2 (0–3) [ | 1.5 (0–3) [ | 2 (1–4) [ | 0.152 |
| Imaging analysis | ||||
| Number of peripheral emboli, median (mean; 95% CI) | 11.6 (9.1–14.2) | 11.1 (7.0–15.1) | 12.1 (8.6–15.5) | 0.701 |
| Time from symptom onset to reperfusion ≤ 6h | 10.6 (7.2–14.0) [ | 11.3 (7.0–15.6) [ | 9.6 (4.4–14.9) [ | 0.413 |
| Volume core infarct in mL, median (IQR) | 19.33 (6.08–54.51) | 15.68 (5.69–51.48) | 25.15 (6.04–56.55) | 0.501 |
| Time from symptom onset to reperfusion ≤ 6h | 17.26 (3.48–48.71) [ | 18.05 (5.30–74.16) [ | 5.97 (2.03–33.27) [ | 0.281 |
| Volume of peripheral infarcts in mL, median (IQR) | 0.62 (0.12–1.57) | 0.39 (0.10–1.62) | 0.70 (0.21–1.55) | 0.554 |
| Time from symptom onset to reperfusion ≤ 6h | 0.62 (0.10–1.53) [ | 0.62 (0.10–1.65) [ | 0.63 (0.08–1.01) [ | 0.590 |
*significant (p < 0.05)