Philip T Yanos1, Shane Adams1, David Roe2, Paul H Lysaker3. 1. John Jay College of Criminal Justice and the Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, New York, USA. 2. University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel. 3. Richard L Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Illness Identity model posits that self-stigma reduces hope and self-esteem among persons with severe mental illnesses, impacting a range of outcomes. The "insight paradox" anticipates that the negative effects of self-stigma are amplified by insight. This study tested these predictions using both cluster and path analyses. METHOD: A total of 117 participants meeting the criteria for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders completed measures of self-stigma, self-esteem, hopelessness, insight, social functioning, coping, and symptoms. RESULTS: Cluster analysis supported the insight paradox; persons with low self-stigma/high insight had fewer psychiatric symptoms and better interpersonal functioning than persons with high self-stigma/low insight. Path analysis did not support the insight paradox, but indicated that self-stigma and insight impact different outcomes. DISCUSSION: Findings suggest that support for the predictions of the Illness Identity model and insight paradox are supported may depend on analytic method. CONCLUSIONS: Finding suggest that the benefits of self-stigma reduction may be constrained by insight.
OBJECTIVE: The Illness Identity model posits that self-stigma reduces hope and self-esteem among persons with severe mental illnesses, impacting a range of outcomes. The "insight paradox" anticipates that the negative effects of self-stigma are amplified by insight. This study tested these predictions using both cluster and path analyses. METHOD: A total of 117 participants meeting the criteria for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders completed measures of self-stigma, self-esteem, hopelessness, insight, social functioning, coping, and symptoms. RESULTS: Cluster analysis supported the insight paradox; persons with low self-stigma/high insight had fewer psychiatric symptoms and better interpersonal functioning than persons with high self-stigma/low insight. Path analysis did not support the insight paradox, but indicated that self-stigma and insight impact different outcomes. DISCUSSION: Findings suggest that support for the predictions of the Illness Identity model and insight paradox are supported may depend on analytic method. CONCLUSIONS: Finding suggest that the benefits of self-stigma reduction may be constrained by insight.