| Literature DB >> 33962959 |
Manuel Krone1, Julia Gütling1, Johannes Wagener1,2, Thiên-Trí Lâm1, Christoph Schoen1, Ulrich Vogel1, August Stich3, Florian Wedekink4, Jörg Wischhusen4, Thomas Kerkau5, Niklas Beyersdorf5, Silvana Klingler6, Simone Backes5, Lars Dölken5, Georg Gasteiger6, Oliver Kurzai1, Alexandra Schubert-Unkmeir1.
Abstract
For the control of immunity in COVID-19 survivors and vaccinated subjects, there is an urgent need for reliable and rapid serological assays. Based on samples from 63 COVID-19 survivors up to 7 months after symptom onset, and on 50 serum samples taken before the beginning of the pandemic, we compared the performances of three commercial immunoassays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgA and IgG antibodies (Euroimmun SARS-COV-2 IgA/IgG, Mikrogen recomWell SARS-CoV-2 IgA/IgG, and Serion ELISA agile SARS-CoV-2 IgA/IgG) and three rapid lateral flow (immunochromatographic) tests (Abbott PanBio COVID-19 IgG/IgM, Nadal COVID-19 IgG/IgM, and Cleartest Corona 2019-nCOV IgG/IgM) with a 50% plaque-reduction neutralization test (PRNT50) representing the gold standard. Fifty-seven out of 63 PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients (90%) showed neutralizing antibodies. The sensitivity of the seven assays ranged from 7.0% to 98.3%, and the specificity ranged from 86.0% to 100.0%. Only one commercial immunoassay showed a sensitivity and specificity of greater than 98%.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; ELISA; SARS-CoV-2; flow cytometry bead-based surrogate test; lateral flow assay; plaque-reduction neutralization test
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33962959 PMCID: PMC8373215 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00319-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Microbiol ISSN: 0095-1137 Impact factor: 5.948