Literature DB >> 33962681

Using next generation sequencing of alpine plants to improve fecal metabarcoding diet analysis for Dall's sheep.

Kelly E Williams1,2, Damian M Menning3, Eric J Wald4, Sandra L Talbot3, Kumi L Rattenbury4, Laura R Prugh5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Dall's sheep (Ovis dalli dalli) are important herbivores in the mountainous ecosystems of northwestern North America, and recent declines in some populations have sparked concern. Our aim was to improve capabilities for fecal metabarcoding diet analysis of Dall's sheep and other herbivores by contributing new sequence data for arctic and alpine plants. This expanded reference library will provide critical reference sequence data that will facilitate metabarcoding diet analysis of Dall's sheep and thus improve understanding of plant-animal interactions in a region undergoing rapid climate change. DATA DESCRIPTION: We provide sequences for the chloroplast rbcL gene of 16 arctic-alpine vascular plant species that are known to comprise the diet of Dall's sheep. These sequences contribute to a growing reference library that can be used in diet studies of arctic herbivores.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alpine; Arctic; Boreal; Chloroplast; Dall’s sheep; Diet; Fecal; Metabarcoding; Plant

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33962681      PMCID: PMC8103577          DOI: 10.1186/s13104-021-05590-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Res Notes        ISSN: 1756-0500


Objective

Dall’s sheep (Ovis dalli dalli) are endemic to alpine ecosystems of northwestern North America, and their populations have been declining in recent decades [1-4]. Climate change may be altering alpine plant communities and contributing to these declines. Dall’s sheep have a generalist plant diet; they were observed eating 110 different plant species in the Yukon Territory, Canada through traditional observational methods [5]. However, the diet of Dall’s sheep remains relatively poorly characterized and represents a gap in understanding how climate change is affecting plant-animal interactions in alpine ecosystems. The level of taxonomic resolution of items consumed in a diet study greatly affects ecological analysis [6]. DNA based tools can infer diet composition with higher resolution and reduces cost, time, and effort compared to observational, morphological, and microhistological methods [7, 8]. Specifically, DNA metabarcoding uses universal primers for multispecies identification to mass-amplify DNA barcodes using PCR that are then read using next generation sequencing and assigned to the appropriate taxon [9]. DNA barcoding includes a reference database of potential diet components, providing the capability to identify diet items to a desirable taxonomic resolution, ensuring that all components will be detected and assigned [10]. Next generation sequencing of DNA from fecal samples has been successfully used to characterize diets of a variety of species, including ungulates [11, 12]. However, metabarcoding has not yet been used to assess the diet of Dall’s sheep. Lack of sequence data for some arctic/alpine plants known to be grazed upon by Dall’s sheep currently limits the development and application of metabarcoding for alpine herbivore diet studies. To improve capabilities for diet analysis of Dall’s sheep and other arctic herbivores, we used a python script [13] to identify gaps in archived nucleotide sequence data for species known to comprise the diet of Dall’s Sheep, then obtained specimens of 16 species of arctic/alpine vascular plants for which sequence information was missing or underrepresented in publicly archived databases. We then sequenced the rbcL gene of the plant chloroplast genome, which is one of the most commonly used barcoding regions for plants [9, 14].

Data description

Plant specimens were obtained from herbarium specimens collected from the various arctic or alpine sites across mainland Alaska (Additional file 1). Plant tissue was extracted at the U. S. Geological Survey Alaska Science Center, employing a CTAB-PVP protocol modified from Stewart and Via [15] as reported by Muñiz-Salazar et al. [16]. Extracts were quantified and shipped to the School of Environmental and Forest Sciences Genetics Lab at the University of Washington for PCR amplification and NexteraXT library preparation for sequencing. The rbcL gene region of each specimen was amplified via a two-step PCR protocol [17] with a primary amplification with tailed primers (rbcLaf + adaptor, rbcLr506 + adaptor) followed by a second round of amplification to anneal NexteraXT indices. Amplicons were quantified using a Qubit 4 Fluorometer (ThermoFisher) and diluted with dH2O to the recommended starting concentration for library preparation, 0.2 ng/μL (Illumina). Tagmentation, library amplification, and clean-up steps were completed according to the NexteraXT library preparation protocol (Illumina) with a variation of using New England Biolabs AMPure XP beads for cleanup instead of Agentcourt AMPure beads. The libraries were normalized and pooled prior to sequencing on an Illumina Miseq platform. Samples were paired-end sequenced in a 2 × 300 bp format . Illumina sequence reads were processed in Geneious Prime 2020.2.4. Forward and reverse read files (fastq) were paired upon import, then quality trimmed with BBDuk trimmer (minimum quality 20, minimum overlap 20, minimum length 20). Sequences were normalized, then aligned and assembled using the de novo assembly tool (Geneious Prime). Assembled contigs were uploaded and annotated using BankIt, then submitted to GenBank [18] (Table 1).
Table 1

Overview of data files for arctic plant rbcL sequencing

LabelName of data file/data setFile typesData repository and identifier
Data file 1Elymus borealis rbcl contig*.gbhttps://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:MW538513 [19]
Data file 2Gentiana propinqua rbcl contig*.gbhttps://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:MW538515 [20]
Data file 3Juncus mertensianus rbcl contig*.gbhttps://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:MW548523 [21]
Data file 4Luzula arctica rbcl contig*.gbhttps://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:MW548524 [22]
Data file 5Ranunculus kamchaticus rbcl contig*.gbhttps://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:MW548525 [23]
Data file 6Oxytropsis scammaniana rbcl contig*.gbhttps://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:MW548526 [24]
Data file 7Packera ogotorukensis rbcl contig*.gbhttps://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:MW548527 [25]
Data file 8Penstemon gormanii rbcl contig*.gbhttps://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:MW548528 [26]
Data file 9Saxifraga caespitosa rbcl contig*.gbhttps://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:MW548529 [27]
Data file 10Silene tayloriae rbcl contig*.gbhttps://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:MW548530 [28]
Data file 11Smelowskia integrifolia rbcl contig*.gbhttps://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:MW548531 [29]
Data file 12Stellaria alaskana rbcl contig*.gbhttps://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:MW548532 [30]
Data file 13Taraxacum lyratum rbcl contig*.gbhttps://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:MW548533 [31]
Data file 14Anemone lithophilia rbcl contig*.gbhttps://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:MW526257 [32]
Data file 15Carex pyrenaica rbcl contig*.gbhttps://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:MW538514 [33]
Data file 16Elymus latiglumis rbcl contig*.gbhttps://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc:MW537582 [34]
Overview of data files for arctic plant rbcL sequencing

Limitations

The following are limitations for these data files: We sequenced one DNA extraction from each plant species. The sequencing project was funded through a grant to train new users on Illumina Nextera sequencing. Additional file 1. Table of information about the plant specimens used for rbcl sequencing.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Who is eating what: diet assessment using next generation sequencing.

Authors:  Francois Pompanon; Bruce E Deagle; William O C Symondson; David S Brown; Simon N Jarman; Pierre Taberlet
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  DNA metabarcoding illuminates dietary niche partitioning by African large herbivores.

Authors:  Tyler R Kartzinel; Patricia A Chen; Tyler C Coverdale; David L Erickson; W John Kress; Maria L Kuzmina; Daniel I Rubenstein; Wei Wang; Robert M Pringle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Selecting barcoding loci for plants: evaluation of seven candidate loci with species-level sampling in three divergent groups of land plants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hollingsworth; Alex Andra Clark; Laura L Forrest; James Richardson; R Toby Pennington; David G Long; Robyn Cowan; Mark W Chase; Myriam Gaudeul; Peter M Hollingsworth
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 7.090

4.  Population genetic structure of annual and perennial populations of Zostera marina L. along the Pacific coast of Baja California and the Gulf of California.

Authors:  Raquel Muñiz-Salazar; Sandra L Talbot; George K Sage; David H Ward; Alejandro Cabello-Pasini
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 5.  Promises and pitfalls of using high-throughput sequencing for diet analysis.

Authors:  Antton Alberdi; Ostaizka Aizpurua; Kristine Bohmann; Shyam Gopalakrishnan; Christina Lynggaard; Martin Nielsen; Marcus Thomas Pius Gilbert
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 7.090

6.  A rapid CTAB DNA isolation technique useful for RAPD fingerprinting and other PCR applications.

Authors:  C N Stewart; L E Via
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.993

7.  Barcoding a quantified food web: crypsis, concepts, ecology and hypotheses.

Authors:  M Alex Smith; Eldon S Eveleigh; Kevin S McCann; Mark T Merilo; Peter C McCarthy; Kathleen I Van Rooyen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Using DNA metabarcoding to investigate honey bee foraging reveals limited flower use despite high floral availability.

Authors:  Natasha de Vere; Laura E Jones; Tegan Gilmore; Jake Moscrop; Abigail Lowe; Dan Smith; Matthew J Hegarty; Simon Creer; Col R Ford
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The menu varies with metabarcoding practices: A case study with the bat Plecotus auritus.

Authors:  Tommy Andriollo; François Gillet; Johan R Michaux; Manuel Ruedi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  GenBank.

Authors:  Dennis A Benson; Mark Cavanaugh; Karen Clark; Ilene Karsch-Mizrachi; David J Lipman; James Ostell; Eric W Sayers
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 16.971

  10 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Advances and Limitations of Next Generation Sequencing in Animal Diet Analysis.

Authors:  Gang Liu; Shumiao Zhang; Xinsheng Zhao; Chao Li; Minghao Gong
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 4.096

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.