| Literature DB >> 33962671 |
Fan Yang1, Fei Liu1, Xinxin Yu1, Wenqi Zheng2, Yudi Wu1, Yue Qiu3, Ying Jin4, Liwang Cui5, Yaming Cao6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transmission-blocking vaccine (TBV) is a promising strategy for malaria elimination. It is hypothesized that mixing or fusing two antigens targeting different stages of sexual development may provide higher transmission-blocking activity than these antigens used individually.Entities:
Keywords: Dual-antigen; Immunological interference; Transmission-blocking activity; Transmission-blocking vaccine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33962671 PMCID: PMC8103607 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-021-04743-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Expression and purification of the recombinant protein. a Diagram illustrating the expressed regions of the Pbg37, PSOP25, and their fusion Pbg37-PSOP25. The signal peptide (red box), low complexity (green box), and transmembrane region (yellow box) are highlighted. The pink line denotes the linker. b Purified recombinant Pbg37-PSOP25 (indicated by an arrow) was separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and stained with Coomassie blue (left) and probed with anti-His mAb on a Western blot (right). M, PageRuler pre-stained protein ladder in kDa
Fig. 2Analysis of specific antibodies by ELISA and Western blot. a, b BALB/c mice (n = 10) were immunized three times with Trx-His tag (immunization control) and recombinant proteins (Pbg37, PSOP25, Pbg37+PSOP25, and Pbg37-PSOP25). The equal volume sera of every mouse per group were pooled at day 10 after the final immunization for ELISA coated with the recombinant Pbg37 (a) and recombinant PSOP25 (b) polypeptides after removal of the Trx tag. Error bars indicate standard deviation. **P < 0.01 indicates a significant difference between the immunization and control groups (ANOVA). c, d The lysates of P. berghei gametocytes (GC) and ookinete (Ook) at 10 μg per lane were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and probed with anti- Pbg37+PSOP25 antisera (c) and anti- Pbg37-PSOP25 antisera (d). The protein loading was estimated by the anti-rHsp70 sera
Fig. 3Indirect immunofluorescence analysis using the bivalent immune sera. Parasites of different developmental stages were fixed and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100. They were stained with antisera against Pbg37+PSOP25 (a) and Pbg37-PSOP25 (b) (1:200) as the primary antibodies (green). The parasites were also co-labeled with antibodies against the markers for different stages (red), including α-tubulin (α) for male gametocytes/gametes, P47 for female gametocytes, Pbs21 for zygotes and ookinetes, and SET for the nucleus of gametocytes. Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antibodies and Alexa Fluor 555-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG antibodies were used as the secondary antibodies. c Negative controls showing the ookinetes labeled with the Trx-His antisera or with the secondary antibodies only. The nucleus was stained with Hoechst-33258 (blue). Images were obtained under the same conditions at a magnification of ×1000. DIC differential interference contrast microscopy. Scale bar = 5 μm
Fig. 4Transmission-blocking activities of the antisera assessed in vitro and in vivo. a Inhibition of exflagellation. P. berghei-infected blood collected at 3 days post infection was incubated with the respective control and immune sera at dilutions of 1:5 and 1:10. Exflagellation centers in 10 microscopic fields were counted after 15 min. b) Inhibition of ookinete formation. Under the same culture conditions, ookinetes formed within 24 h were stained with Pbs21 mAb and counted. Data for exflagellation and ookinetes were representative of three independent experiments. c Midgut oocysts were counted from individual mosquitoes infected with parasites 12 days after the blood meal. The results were collected from three mice in each immunization group and in two separate experiments (n = 180). Data points represent oocyst numbers in individual mosquitoes. Horizontal bars indicate the mean number of oocysts per midgut. d Mosquito infection prevalence was calculated at 12 days after the blood meal. Data points represent the prevalence of infection in mosquitoes from three mice per group and in two separate experiments. Error bars indicate mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 represent the significant difference between the respective immunization group and the Trx-His control group. #P < 0.05 and ##P < 0.01 represent significant difference between two immunization groups
Evaluation of the transmission-blocking activity of different immunization groups in mosquito feeding assays
| Mouse | Immunization group | Oocyst density mean (range) | TRAa | Prevalence of infection mean ( | TBAb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mouse 1–6 | Control | 130.6 (0–254) | 94.4% (170/180) | ||
| Trx-His | 129.4 (0–254) | 95.6% (172/180) | |||
| Pbg37 | 66.8 (0–224) | 48.4% | 92.2% (166/180) | 3.4% | |
| PSOP25 | 48.7 (0–167) | 62.3% | 82.8% (149/180) | 12.8% | |
| Pbg37+PSOP25 | 32.4 (0–138) | 74.9% | 80.0% (144/180) | 15.6% | |
| Pbg37-PSOP25 | 29.7 (0–140) | 77.0% | 76.1% (137/180) | 19.5% |
aTRA was calculated as (mean oocyst densityTrx-His – mean oocyst density Pbg37/PSOP25/Pbg37+PSOP25/Pbg37-PSOP25) / mean oocyst densityTrx-His × 100%
b TBA was calculated as % prevalenceTrx-His – % prevalencePbg37/PSOP25/Pbg37+PSOP25/Pbg37-PSOP25