| Literature DB >> 33962637 |
Ishir Bhan1, Claudia Prada1, Dayle James1, Stacie Lallier1, Anne Dilley1, Susan Hall1, Emma Viscidi2, Nasha Wang1, Maneesh Juneja3, Corinne Makepeace4, Karen Laird4, Susan Eaton1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The incidence of hydrocephalus in the spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) population relative to the general population is currently unknown. Since the approval of nusinersen, an intrathecally administered drug for SMA, a small number of hydrocephalus cases among nusinersen users have been reported. Currently, the incidence of hydrocephalus in untreated SMA patients is not available, thereby making it difficult to determine if hydrocephalus is a side effect of nusinersen or part of SMA's natural history. This retrospective, matched cohort study used electronic health records (EHRs) to estimate and compare the incidence of hydrocephalus in both SMA patients and matched non-SMA controls in the time period prior to the approval of nusinersen.Entities:
Keywords: Hydrocephalus; Nusinersen; Spinal muscular atrophy
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33962637 PMCID: PMC8105953 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-021-01822-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis ISSN: 1750-1172 Impact factor: 4.123
Fig. 1Matched cohort study design of the incidence of hydrocephalus among SMA cases and non-SMA controls. EHR electronic health record, SMA spinal muscular atrophy. aNon-SMA matched controls matched to SMA cases on birth year, sex, and index date
Patient demographics
| Category | SMA cases (N = 5354) | SMA cases who developed hydrocephalus (N = 42) | Non-SMA matched controls (N = 5354) | Non-SMA matched controls who developed hydrocephalus (N = 9) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age at index date (years) | ||||
| Mean | 45.0 | 46.9 | 45.0 | 59.7 |
| Median | 45 | 57 | 45 | 70 |
| Min, max | 0, 86 | 0, 86 | 0, 86 | 8, 85 |
| SD | 23.65 | 30.59 | 23.65 | 27.99 |
| Age (years) at index date categories (n, %) | ||||
| 0 to < 1 | 95 (1.8) | 2 (4.8) | 95 (1.8) | 0 (0.0) |
| 1 to < 2 | 114 (2.1) | 3 (7.1) | 114 (2.1) | 0 (0.0) |
| 2 to < 13 | 442 (8.3) | 5 (12) | 442 (8.3) | 1 (11.0) |
| 13 to ≤ 20 | 326 (6.1) | 3 (7.1) | 326 (6.1) | 1 (11.0) |
| 21 to ≤ 30 | 436 (8.1) | 2 (4.8) | 436 (8.1) | 0 (0.0) |
| 31 to ≤ 40 | 926 (17.0) | 0 (0.0) | 926 (17.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| 41 to ≤ 50 | 653 (12.0) | 1 (2.4) | 653 (12.0) | 1 (11.0) |
| > 50 | 2362 (44.0) | 26 (62.0) | 2362 (44.0) | 6 (67.0) |
| Sex (n, %) | ||||
| Female | 2521 (47.0) | 18 (43.0) | 2521 (47.0) | 3 (33.0) |
| Male | 2833 (53.0) | 24 (57.0) | 2833 (53.0) | 6 (67.0) |
| Time in database (months) | ||||
| Mean | 90.6 | 96.5 | 90.6 | 136.4 |
| Median | 93 | 107.5 | 93 | 159 |
| SD | 46.65 | 54.66 | 46.65 | 42.69 |
SD standard deviation, SMA spinal muscular atrophy
Fig. 2Age at index date among SMA cases (n = 42) and non-SMA matched controls (n = 9) with hydrocephalus. Index date = date of first SMA diagnostic code for cases and a matched date for non-SMA controls. SMA spinal muscular atrophy
Hydrocephalus incidence rates
| Rate per 100,000 PMs among SMA cases (N = 5354) (IR [95% CI]) | Rate per 100,000 PMs among non-SMA matched controls (N = 5354) (IR [95% CI]) | Incidence rate ratioa (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Incident hydrocephalus events | 42 | 9 | |
| Overall incidence rate | 15.5 (11.2–20.9) | 3.3 (1.5–6.3) | 4.7 (2.4–10.2) |
| Incidence rate by sex | |||
| Female | 13.9 (8.2–21.9) | 2.3 (0.5–6.7) | 6.0 (1.9–25.7) |
| Male | 17.0 (10.9–25.3) | 4.2 (1.6–9.2) | 4.0 (1.7–10.8) |
| Incidence rate by age at index date (years) | |||
| < 1 | 50.7 (6.1–183.3) | 0.00 | N/C |
| 1 to < 2 | 55.5 (11.4–162.1) | 0.00 | N/C |
| 2 to < 13 | 17.3 (5.6–40.4) | 3.4 (0.1–19.1) | 5.1 (0.7–120.1) |
| 13 to ≤ 20 | 16.6 (3.4–48.5) | 5.5 (0.1–30.7) | 3.0 (0.3–79.3) |
| 21 to ≤ 30 | 9.8 (1.2–35.5) | 0.00 | N/C |
| 31 to ≤ 40 | 0.00 | 0.00 | N/C |
| 41 to ≤ 50 | 2.8 (0.1–15.9) | 2.8 (0.1–15.9) | 1.0 (0.0–39.0) |
| > 50 | 21.7 (14.2–31.8) | 5.0 (1.8–10.9) | 4.4 (1.9–11.6) |
CI confidence interval, IR incidence rate, IRR incidence rate ratio, N/C not calculable, PM person-month, SMA spinal muscular atrophy
a95% CI for IRR not calculated due to small sample size