Peter Kopač1, Adnan Custovic2, Mihaela Zidarn3, Mira Šilar4, Julij Šelb3, Nissera Bajrović3, Renato Eržen3, Mitja Košnik3, Peter Korošec4. 1. University Hospital of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Golnik, Slovenia; Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia. Electronic address: peter.kopac@klinika-golnik.si. 2. National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom. 3. University Hospital of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Golnik, Slovenia; Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia. 4. University Hospital of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Golnik, Slovenia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A biomarker that could identify individuals at high risk for severe honeybee sting allergic reaction and/or systemic adverse events (SAEs) during venom immunotherapy (VIT) would improve the management of patients with honeybee (HB) venom allergy. OBJECTIVE: To identify biomarkers for risk of severe sting reactions or SAEs during VIT. METHODS: We recruited 332 patients undergoing HB VIT. We ascertained predictors of the severity of the field-sting reaction and the severity and threshold of SAEs during VIT. We assessed the use of cardiovascular medications; baseline serum tryptase (BST) levels; specific IgEs to HB venom, rApi m 1, and rApi m 10; and basophil activation test (BAT) response. RESULTS: Significant and independent predictors of a severe HB field-sting reaction were age (P = .008), an absence of skin symptoms (P = .001), BST (P = .014), and BAT response at an HB venom concentration of 0.1 μg/mL (P = .001). Predictors of severe SAEs during HB VIT were age (P = .025), BST (P = .006), and BAT response (P = .001). BAT response was also an individual and significant predictor of any SAEs and SAEs at a low cumulative allergen dose (median, 55 μg) during VIT build-up (P < .001). The use of β-blockers and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and specific IgE levels were not associated with the severity of HB field-sting reactions or VIT SAEs. CONCLUSIONS: BST and basophil activation are independent risk factors for severe HB sting anaphylaxis and SAEs during HB VIT. BAT response was the best biomarker for any SAEs and a lower threshold of SAEs during HB VIT. These risk factors can help guide recommendations for VIT and overcome systemic reactions to HB VIT.
BACKGROUND: A biomarker that could identify individuals at high risk for severe honeybee sting allergic reaction and/or systemic adverse events (SAEs) during venom immunotherapy (VIT) would improve the management of patients with honeybee (HB) venom allergy. OBJECTIVE: To identify biomarkers for risk of severe sting reactions or SAEs during VIT. METHODS: We recruited 332 patients undergoing HBVIT. We ascertained predictors of the severity of the field-sting reaction and the severity and threshold of SAEs during VIT. We assessed the use of cardiovascular medications; baseline serum tryptase (BST) levels; specific IgEs to HB venom, rApi m 1, and rApi m 10; and basophil activation test (BAT) response. RESULTS: Significant and independent predictors of a severe HB field-sting reaction were age (P = .008), an absence of skin symptoms (P = .001), BST (P = .014), and BAT response at an HB venom concentration of 0.1 μg/mL (P = .001). Predictors of severe SAEs during HBVIT were age (P = .025), BST (P = .006), and BAT response (P = .001). BAT response was also an individual and significant predictor of any SAEs and SAEs at a low cumulative allergen dose (median, 55 μg) during VIT build-up (P < .001). The use of β-blockers and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and specific IgE levels were not associated with the severity of HB field-sting reactions or VIT SAEs. CONCLUSIONS: BST and basophil activation are independent risk factors for severe HB sting anaphylaxis and SAEs during HBVIT. BAT response was the best biomarker for any SAEs and a lower threshold of SAEs during HBVIT. These risk factors can help guide recommendations for VIT and overcome systemic reactions to HBVIT.
Authors: Moritz M Hollstein; Silke S Matzke; Lisa Lorbeer; Susann Forkel; Thomas Fuchs; Christiane Lex; Timo Buhl Journal: J Asthma Allergy Date: 2022-07-07