Literature DB >> 3396164

Intravenous streptokinase for acute myocardial infarction. Effects on global and regional systolic function.

G V Martin1, F H Sheehan, M Stadius, C Maynard, K B Davis, J L Ritchie, J W Kennedy.   

Abstract

The Western Washington Intravenous Streptokinase Trial randomized 368 patients with acute myocardial infarction to receive either intravenous streptokinase or standard therapy. The ventriculograms and coronary angiograms obtained in 170 patients 10.4 +/- 7.4 days after infarction were analyzed to evaluate the effects of thrombolytic therapy on global and regional systolic function. Streptokinase treatment resulted in a higher patency rate of the infarct-related artery (68.5%) than did standard therapy (44.8%) (p = 0.003). Ejection fraction was higher in streptokinase-treated patients (54% vs. 51%, p = 0.056), and the difference was most marked in patients with anterior myocardial infarction (53% vs. 44%, p = 0.03). Regional wall motion was measured by the centerline method and expressed in mean +/- SD motion in 52 normal subjects. There was a trend toward better function of the infarct zone in streptokinase-treated patients (SD, -2.48 vs. -2.70, p = 0.24). Additionally, streptokinase-treated patients had significantly better wall motion of noninfarct areas (SD, 0.36 vs. -0.08, p = 0.02). Treatment effects on function of noninfarct regions were most apparent in the subset of patients with multivessel disease. Thus, intravenous streptokinase preserves left ventricular function in patients with acute myocardial infarction. This benefit includes favorable effects on the function of regions remote from the site of infarction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3396164     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.78.2.258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  8 in total

Review 1.  Cardiology.

Authors:  L D Smith; D J Coltart
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Is thrombolytic therapy in acute inferior myocardial infarction really better than conventional treatment?

Authors:  T J Tobé
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-02

Review 3.  Intravenous streptokinase. A reappraisal of its therapeutic use in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  K L Goa; J M Henwood; J F Stolz; M S Langley; S P Clissold
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Is thrombolytic therapy really better than conventional treatment in acute inferior myocardial infarction?

Authors:  H S Lee
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-10

5.  Computerized left ventricular regional ejection fraction analysis for detection of ischemic coronary artery disease with multidetector CT angiography.

Authors:  Irfan Zeb; Dong Li; Khurram Nasir; Mohit Gupta; Jigar Kadakia; Yanlin Gao; Eva Ma; Song Shou Mao; Matthew Budoff
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Koushik Reddy; Asma Khaliq; Robert J Henning
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-26

Review 7.  Uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Martine J Jager; Carol L Shields; Colleen M Cebulla; Mohamed H Abdel-Rahman; Hans E Grossniklaus; Marc-Henri Stern; Richard D Carvajal; Rubens N Belfort; Renbing Jia; Jerry A Shields; Bertil E Damato
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 52.329

8.  Angiographic outcomes in STEMI patients receiving fibrinolysis with guideline directed optimal antithrombotic therapy.

Authors:  Shazia Durdana; Mohammad Azharuddin Malik; Asif Hasan; M U Rabbani
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2020-11-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.