Luciana E Hebert1, Michelle C Sarche2. 1. Institute for Research and Education Advancing Community Health (IREACH), Washington State University, 1100 Olive Way, Suite 1200, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA. luciana.hebert@wsu.edu. 2. Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver, 13055 E. 17th Place, F800 Nighthorse Campbell Native Health Bldg. Rm 342, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Estimates of prenatal alcohol use among American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) women are limited. This study sought to characterize pre-pregnancy and prenatal alcohol use among AI/AN women in the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) dataset, evaluate variation in alcohol use by state and rural/urban residence, and evaluate associations between potential risk factors and prenatal alcohol use among AI/AN and non-Hispanic white (NHW) women. METHODS: We pooled PRAMS data from five states (Alaska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota and Washington) from 2015 to 2017. We estimated the prevalence of pre-pregnancy and pregnancy risk factors, and alcohol use by race and examined alcohol use by state and rural/urban residence among AI/AN women. We conducted bivariate and multivariable logistic regression modelling to estimate the association between each risk factor of interest and the odds of prenatal alcohol use for AI/AN and NHW women. RESULTS: AI/AN women were less likely to report pre-pregnancy alcohol use compared to NHW women (56% vs. 76%, p < 0.0001). Among women who reported drinking pre-pregnancy, AI/AN women were more likely than NHW women to report drinking 1 or more drinks during pregnancy (4.3% vs. 2.4, p = 0.0049). For AI/AN women, older age and experiencing homelessness (aOR = 2.76; 95% CI 1.16-6.55) increased odds of prenatal alcohol use. For NHW women, having a college education (aOR = 4.06; 95% CI 1.19-13.88) and urban residence (aOR = 1.88; 95% CI 1.40-2.53) increased odds of prenatal alcohol use. CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with prenatal alcohol use differ between AI/AN women and NHW women, suggesting the need for tailored interventions.
INTRODUCTION: Estimates of prenatal alcohol use among American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) women are limited. This study sought to characterize pre-pregnancy and prenatal alcohol use among AI/AN women in the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) dataset, evaluate variation in alcohol use by state and rural/urban residence, and evaluate associations between potential risk factors and prenatal alcohol use among AI/AN and non-Hispanic white (NHW) women. METHODS: We pooled PRAMS data from five states (Alaska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota and Washington) from 2015 to 2017. We estimated the prevalence of pre-pregnancy and pregnancy risk factors, and alcohol use by race and examined alcohol use by state and rural/urban residence among AI/AN women. We conducted bivariate and multivariable logistic regression modelling to estimate the association between each risk factor of interest and the odds of prenatal alcohol use for AI/AN and NHW women. RESULTS: AI/AN women were less likely to report pre-pregnancy alcohol use compared to NHW women (56% vs. 76%, p < 0.0001). Among women who reported drinking pre-pregnancy, AI/AN women were more likely than NHW women to report drinking 1 or more drinks during pregnancy (4.3% vs. 2.4, p = 0.0049). For AI/AN women, older age and experiencing homelessness (aOR = 2.76; 95% CI 1.16-6.55) increased odds of prenatal alcohol use. For NHW women, having a college education (aOR = 4.06; 95% CI 1.19-13.88) and urban residence (aOR = 1.88; 95% CI 1.40-2.53) increased odds of prenatal alcohol use. CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with prenatal alcohol use differ between AI/AN women and NHW women, suggesting the need for tailored interventions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Alaska Native; American Indian; PRAMS; Pregnancy; Prenatal alcohol use
Authors: Mei L Castor; Michael S Smyser; Maile M Taualii; Alice N Park; Shelley A Lawson; Ralph A Forquera Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-03-29 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Holly B Shulman; Denise V D'Angelo; Leslie Harrison; Ruben A Smith; Lee Warner Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2018-08-23 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Vichithra R B Liyanage; Kyle Curtis; Robby M Zachariah; Albert E Chudley; Mojgan Rastegar Journal: Curr Top Med Chem Date: 2017 Impact factor: 3.295