| Literature DB >> 33959397 |
Bashiru Babatunde Jimah1, Anthony Baffour Appiah2, Benjamin Dabo Sarkodie3, Dorothea Anim4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pain, anxiety, and distress are common in radiological investigations including hysterosalpingogram (HSG). Studies suggest that sedation allows patients to better tolerate diagnostic imaging and image-guided procedures by relieving anxiety, discomfort, and pain. This study aimed at assessing the safety and effectiveness of ketamine use in HSG and the proportion of true positive bilateral tubal blockage during HSG using the Jimah Procedure.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33959397 PMCID: PMC8075684 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6657137
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiol Res Pract ISSN: 2090-195X
Characteristics of patients undergoing ketamine sedation for HSG.
| Characteristics | Frequency, | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Median (IQR) | 34 (32–37) | — |
| 25–34 | 14 | 51.9 |
| ≥35 | 13 | 48.1 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Primary infertility | 7 | 25.9 |
| Secondary infertility | 20 | 74.1 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Median (IQR) | 20 (20–30) | — |
| 20 mg/mL | 18 | 66.7 |
| 30 mg/mL | 4 | 14.8 |
| 40 mg/mL | 5 | 18.5 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Median (IQR) | 65 (64–67) | — |
| <60 bpm | 1 | 3.7 |
| 60–100 bpm | 26 | 96.3 |
| >100 bpm | 0 | 0.0 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Median (IQR) | 98 (95–100) | — |
| <60 bpm | 0 | 0.0 |
| 60–100 bpm | 23 | 85.2 |
| >100 bpm | 4 | 14.8 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| No | 0 | 0.0 |
| Yes | 27 | 100.0 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| 9 | 8 | 29.6 |
| 10 | 19 | 70.4 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| No | 27 | 100.0 |
| Yes | 0 | 0.0 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| None | 25 | 92.6 |
| Vomiting | 2 | 7.4 |
Figure 1Distribution of tubal finding on HSG among 27 infertile women under ketamine sedation. RTP: right tubal patency; LTB: left tubal blockage; RTB: right tubal blockage; LTP: left tubal patency; BH: bilateral hydrosalpinx; LLT: leakage left tube.
Distribution of HSG findings by the age group of infertile women under ketamine sedation.
| HSG findings | Age group | Fisher's exact test | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25–34 years | ≥35 years |
| |
|
| 0.124 | ||
| Bilateral tubal blockage | 5 (41.7) | 7 (58.3) | |
| Bilateral tubal patency | 8 (80.0) | 2 (20.0) | |
| RTP, LTB | 1 (33.3) | 2 (66.7) | |
| LTP, RTB | 0 (0.0) | 1 (100.0) | |
| BH, LLT | 0 (0.0) | 1 (100.0) | |
|
| |||
|
| 0.041 | ||
| Fibroid | 0 (0.0) | 3 (100.0) | |
| Normal | 14 (60.9) | 9 (39.1) | |
| Irregular/postsurgery | 0 (0.0) | 1 (100.0) | |
Significant level at p ≤ 0.05. RTP: right tubal patency; LTP: left tubal patency; LTB: left tubal blockage; RTB: right tubal blockage; BH: bilateral hydrosalpinx; LLT: leakage left tube.
True positive HSG diagnosis (bilateral tubal blockage).
| Bilateral blockage | Initial HSG (A) | Follow-up HSG (B) |
|---|---|---|
| Positive | 27 (100.0) | 12 (44.4%)# |
| Negative | 0 (0.0) | 15 (55.6%) |
| Total | 27 (100.0) | 27 (100.0) |
#Proportion of true positive bilateral tubal blockage. A: HSG procedure without ketamine sedation. B: repeated HSG procedure under ketamine sedation.