| Literature DB >> 33959116 |
Ampapan Naknaen1, Oramas Suttinun1,2, Komwit Surachat3,4, Eakalak Khan5, Rattanaruji Pomwised6.
Abstract
Microcystis poses a concern because of its potential contribution to eutrophication and production of microcystins (MCs). Phage treatment has been proposed as a novel biocontrol method for Microcystis. Here, we isolated a lytic cyanophage named PhiMa05 with high efficiency against MCs-producing Microcystis strains. Its burst size was large, with approximately 127 phage particles/infected cell, a short latent period (1 day), and high stability to broad salinity, pH and temperature ranges. The PhiMa05 structure was composed of an icosahedral capsid (100 nm) and tail (120 nm), suggesting that the PhiMa05 belongs to the Myoviridae family. PhiMa05 inhibited both planktonic and aggregated forms of Microcystis in a concentration-dependent manner. The lysis of Microcystis resulted in a significant reduction of total MCs compared to the uninfected cells. A genome analysis revealed that PhiMa05 is a double-stranded DNA virus with a 273,876 bp genome, considered a jumbo phage. Out of 254 predicted open reading frames (ORFs), only 54 ORFs were assigned as putative functional proteins. These putative proteins are associated with DNA metabolisms, structural proteins, host lysis and auxiliary metabolic genes (AMGs), while no lysogenic, toxin and antibiotic resistance genes were observed in the genome. The AMGs harbored in the phage genome are known to be involved in energy metabolism [photosynthesis and tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA)] and nucleotide biosynthesis genes. Their functions suggested boosting and redirecting host metabolism during viral infection. Comparative genome analysis with other phages in the database indicated that PhiMa05 is unique. Our study highlights the characteristics and genome analysis of a novel jumbo phage, PhiMa05. PhiMa05 is a potential phage for controlling Microcystis bloom and minimizing MC occurrence.Entities:
Keywords: Microcystis; aggregation; auxiliary metabolic genes; cyanophage; efficiency of phage killing (EOK); genome analysis; jumbo phage
Year: 2021 PMID: 33959116 PMCID: PMC8093824 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.660351
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1(A) Plaques of cyanophage PhiMa05 on the lawn of SG03. TEM images of: (B) Cyanophage PhiMa05; (C) thin section of a healthy cell of Microsystis SG03; and (D) thin section of Microsystis SG03 2 days after incubation with PhiMa05.
FIGURE 2Dendrogram for Microcystis strains created by HIP PCR. HIP PCR was performed in 10 Microcystis isolates, creating 2 groups: (A) and (B).
FIGURE 3One-step growth curve of cyanophage PhiMa05. Data are the mean of triplicate independent experiments with standard deviation.
FIGURE 4Time killing assay of cyanophage PhiMa05 against Microcystis SG03. The bacterial cultures were infected with the cyanophage at MOIs of 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, and 100. Uninfected bacterial culture was used as a control. Independent experiments were conducted in triplicate and optical density at 680 nm was measured, averaged, and plotted. Error bars are standard deviations.
FIGURE 5Changes in accumulated microcystins (IMCs) and lysis-mediated microcystins (LM-MCs) on days 3 and 5 of the control and PhiMa05 infected culture of Microcystis SG03 at MOIs of 0.01, 1, and 100. Each data point is the mean from three independent experiments. Error bars show standard deviations. Different letters above bars show values that are significantly different (p < 0.05). Each value is compared within each category.
FIGURE 6Effect of cyanophage PhiMa05 on aggregated Microcystis SG03. The aggregated cells were infected with the cyanophage at MOIs of 0.1, 1, 10, and 100. (A) Time-kill assay of cyanophage PhiMa05 against aggregated Microcystis SG03. (B) Effect of phage on bacterial aggregation. The data show the means ± standard deviations based on triplicated experiments.
FIGURE 7(A) Changes in accumulated microcystins (IMCs) and lysis-mediated microcystins (LM-MCs) after PhiMa05 infecting aggregated Microcystis SG03 at MOI of 100 on days 3 and 7. Each data point is the mean value from three independent experiments ± standard deviation (P value < 0.05). (B,C) Scanning electron micrographs after the phage treatment at MOI of 100: (B) Uninfected bacterial aggregation, (C) PhiMa05 infecting aggregated cells. Scale bar = 5 μm.
Predicted ORFs of cyanophage PhiMa05 with similarity to genes of know function.
| ORF | Putative proteins | Phage | Identity (%) | GenBank ID | |
| 8 | Tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase | 1.00E-20 | 30 | AXH72876.1 | |
| 11 | Putative RNA polymerase sigma subunit | 5.00E-21 | 37 | AZF88386.1 | |
| 36 | Transcription antitermination protein | 4.00E-14 | 28 | ATE84713.1 | |
| 58 | Ribonucleoside-diphosphate reductase | 9.00E-10 | 35 | YP_007674964.1 | |
| 60 | RNA polymerase sigma factor | 4.00E-82 | 50 | YP_009882596.1 | |
| 76 | DNA polymerase IV | 9.00E-24 | 30 | AZV00415.1 | |
| 94 | PcnB tRNA nucleotidyltransferase/poly(A) polymerase | Uncultured | 8.80E-12 | 24 | CAB4197116.1 |
| 104 | Pentapeptide repeat | Uncultured | 5.00E-27 | 40 | CAB5225639.1 |
| 106 | GTP-binding protein | 6.00E-06 | 26 | QBQ71826.1 | |
| 112 | Glycine-tRNA ligase beta subunit | 4.00E-06 | 46 | QMP18904.1 | |
| 132 | DNA repair exonuclease SbcCD ATPase subunit | Phage 5P_2 | 8.00E-06 | 35 | AZF90183.1 |
| 136 | GIY-YIG nuclease superfamily protein | Vibrio phage 1.031.O._10N.261.46.F8 | 2.00E-07 | 35 | AUR82991.1 |
| 144 | MutT-like nucleotide pyrophosphohydrolase | 1.00E-04 | 28 | QJD50776.1 | |
| 148 | TopA topoisomerase IA | Uncultured | 6.00E-123 | 37 | CAB4197034.1 |
| 177 | Leucine-tRNA ligase | 3.00E-04 | 22 | ATW69266.1 | |
| 183 | PurB Adenylosuccinate lyase | Uncultured | 2.00E-74 | 36 | CAB4177963.1 |
| 188 | Threonine-tRNA ligase | 9.00E-10 | 26 | QCW19681.1 | |
| 189 | FusA translation elongation factors (GTPases) | Uncultured | 5.00E-25 | 38 | CAB4196865.1 |
| 208 | RNA polymerase sigma-W factor | crAssphage cr118_1 | 8.00E-15 | 30 | QOR58402.1 |
| 211 | LysU Lysyl-tRNA synthetase (class II) | Uncultured | 3.00E-75 | 25 | CAB4196783.1 |
| 221 | Amidophosphoribosyltransferase | 6.00E-105 | 42 | QHJ75434.1 | |
| 222 | Putative phosphoribosyl formylglycinamidine (FGAM) synthase II | 3.00E-173 | 40 | YP_001294830.1 | |
| 224 | Pentapeptide repeat family protein | 2.00E-20 | 40 | QDH50377.1 | |
| 242 | RNA binding protein | 4.00E-10 | 28 | ATN93725.1 | |
| 248 | MerR family transcriptional regulator | 4.00E-07 | 32 | QBX13757.1 |
FIGURE 8Maximum likelihood amino acid tree of the PhiMa05 major capsid protein. Boostraps values are shown (100 replicate). Black circle and star represent phage family of Myoviridae and Ackermannviridae, respectively.
FIGURE 9Comparative genome analysis of phage PhiMa05 genome with Microcystis phages. The colored collinear blocks indicate homologous regions between genome sequences while the height of the similarity profile in the collinear blocks indicates average level of conservation in the regions of the genome sequence.