| Literature DB >> 33958890 |
Jin-Qiao Liu1, Wen-Juan Chen1, Meng-Jie Zhou1, Wen-Feng Li1, Ju Tang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ischemic-type biliary lesions (ITBL) are accepted as the most incomprehensible biliary complications after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Early predicting the development of ITBL in pediatric patients permits more preventive strategies. However, few studies have focused on the early prediction of ITBL.Entities:
Keywords: biliary atresia; color Doppler flow imaging; ischemic-type biliary lesions; liver stiffness measurement; living-donor liver transplantation; pediatric patients
Year: 2021 PMID: 33958890 PMCID: PMC8096442 DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S305827
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Gen Med ISSN: 1178-7074
Figure 1Flow chart of patient selection for training and validation cohorts.
Figure 2LSM obtained by SWE in BA child underwent LDLT. The SWE showed a stiffness color map (top) and a grayscale image (bottom). The mean LSM value in the ROI was 5.1 kPa.
Figure 3Kaplan–Meier analysis for the incidence of ITBL in the training cohort and validation cohort within 2 years after LDLT. The incidence of ITBL in the training cohort and validation cohort were 28.1% and 26.7%, respectively.
Comparison of the Baseline Characteristics Between the ITBL Group and the Non-ITBL Group
| Characteristics | ITBL Group (n=18) | Non-ITBL Group (n=46) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age at LDLT (year) | 6.5 (2, 9) | 5.5 (3, 7.5) | 0.875# | |
| Gender [n (%)] | Male | 10 (55.6%) | 21 (45.7%) | 0.581$ |
| Female | 8 (44.4%) | 25 (54.3%) | ||
| Weight at LDLT (kg) | 8.23±2.61 | 9.41±4.63 | 0.313* | |
| Last PELD score | 15.33±4.30 | 12.59±4.00 | 0.019* | |
| KPE history [n (%)] | 15 (83.3%) | 42 (91.3%) | 0.391$ | |
| GRWR (%) | 2.59±0.77 | 2.75±0.80 | 0.487* | |
| Cold ischemia time (min) | 48 (34, 63) | 53 (46, 61) | 0.292# | |
| Intraoperative blood loss volume (mL) | 252.78±92.87 | 262.67±77.00 | 0.664* | |
Notes: *For independent sample t-test, $for Fisher exact test, #for Mann–Whitney U-test.
Abbreviations: ITBL, ischemic-type biliary lesions; LDLT, living-donor liver transplantation; PELD, last pediatric end-stage liver disease; KPE, Kasai portoenterostomy; GRWR, graft-to-recipient weight ratio.
Comparison of the Liver Function and Ultrasound-Based Multimodal Imaging at One-Month Post-LDLT Between the Two Groups
| Variables | ITBL Group (n=18) | Non-ITBL Group (n=46) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liver function | |||
| ALT (IU/L) | 26.50±3.24 | 25.89±6.08 | 0.604* |
| AST (IU/L) | 28.22±3.04 | 26.43±4.26 | 0.110* |
| TBil (mg/dL) | 16.53 (14.17, 20.16) | 14.56 (12.27, 18.49) | 0.160# |
| DBil (mg/dL) | 5.39 (4.75, 6.20) | 5.27 (3.98, 6.10) | 0.586# |
| ALP (IU/L) | 94.78±11.74 | 89.87±10.65 | 0.037* |
| GGT (IU/L) | 35 (24, 44.75) | 27 (22.75, 35.25) | 0.022# |
| Ultrasound-based multimodal imaging | |||
| PSV (cm/s) | 55.11±9.47 | 62.54±13.96 | 0.042* |
| EDV (cm/s) | 15.91±6.60 | 16.50±5.01 | 0.735* |
| RI | 0.66±0.15 | 0.58±0.11 | 0.013* |
| PI | 1.03±0.32 | 1.05±0.27 | 0.865* |
| PVV (cm/s) | 48.50±14.65 | 50.39±13.94 | 0.640* |
| LSM value (kPa) | 6.25 (5.78, 8.50) | 5.45 (4.65, 6.73) | 0.002# |
Notes: *For independent sample t-test, #for Mann–Whitney U-test.
Abbreviations: LDLT, living-donor liver transplantation; ITBL, ischemic-type biliary lesions; ALT, alanine amino-transferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; TBil, total bilirubin; DBil, direct bilirubin; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase; PSV, peak systolic velocity; EDV, end diastolic velocity; RI, resistive index; PI, pulsation index; PVV, portal vein velocity; LSM, liver stiffness measurement.
Figure 4Forest plot of Cox regression analysis for predicting the development of ITBL within 2 years post-LDLT. Last PELD score, GGT, RI, and LSM were the independent predictors. The hazard ratio for RI is 2.055 per 0.1 incremental increase.
Figure 5Nomogram predicting the risk of ITBL within 2 years post-LDLT. The top row showed the point assignment for each variable. Rows 2–5 indicated the variables included in the nomogram. The bottom row showed the probability of ITBL within 2 years.
Figure 6Internal and external validation of the nomogram predicting the risk of ITBL within 2 years post-LDLT. The ROC curves were plotted for the discrimination of the nomogram. The AUCs in the training cohort and validation cohort were 0.888 (95% CI 0.784 to 0.953) (A) and 0.857 (95% CI 0.748 to 0.932) (B), respectively, indicating good discrimination. The calibration curves were plotted for evaluating the calibration of nomogram-predicted prognosis and actual prognosis estimated using KM analysis. The calibration plots in the training and validation datasets were shown in (C) and (D). Both indicated that the nomogram-predicted prognosis compared very well with the actual prognosis.
Figure 7ROC curves of last PELD score, GGT, RI, and LSM in predicting the development of ITBL within 2 years post-LDLT. Their AUCs were 0.670 (95% CI 0.541 to 0.783), 0.702 (95% CI 0.575 to 0.810), 0.646 (95% CI 0.517 to 0.762), and 0.757 (95% CI 0.633 to 0.855), respectively.