| Literature DB >> 33958888 |
Hideki Shibata1, Takeshi Aoki1, Tomotake Koizumi1, Tomokazu Kusano1, Tatsuya Yamazaki1, Kazuhiko Saito1, Takahito Hirai1, Kodai Tomioka1, Yusuke Wada1, Tomoki Hakozaki1, Yoshihiko Tashiro1, Koji Nogaki1, Kosuke Yamada1, Kazuhiro Matsuda1, Akira Fujimori1, Yuta Enami1, Masahiko Murakami1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Bile duct injury is one of the most serious complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) cholangiography is a safe and useful navigation modality for confirming the biliary anatomy. ICG cholangiography is expected to be a routine method for helping avoid bile duct injuries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We examined 25 patients who underwent intraoperative cholangiography using ICG fluorescence. Two methods of ICG injection are used: intrabiliary injection (percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage [PTGBD], gallbladder [GB] puncture and endoscopic nasobiliary drainage [ENBD]) at a dosage of 0.025 mg during the operation or intravenous injection with 2.5 mg ICG preoperatively.Entities:
Keywords: indocyanine green fluorescent imaging; navigation surgery; near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography
Year: 2021 PMID: 33958888 PMCID: PMC8096340 DOI: 10.2147/CEG.S275985
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Exp Gastroenterol ISSN: 1178-7023
Patients’ Characteristics
| Number | 24 |
|---|---|
| Age(y) | 62.8 |
| Sex (male/female) | 14/10 |
| ICG administration route | |
| Intravenous injections | 12 |
| PTGBD | 8 |
| Gallbladder puncture | 3 |
| ENBD | 1 |
| Operation time (min) | 127 |
| Blood loss (g) | 43.2 |
| Postoperative hospital stay (day) | 4.6 |
| Complications (C-D≧III) | 0 |
Abbreviations: PTGBD, percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage; ENBD, endoscopic nasobiliary drainage.
Visualization of the Biliary Tract with Intraoperative Cholangiography
| ICG Injection Route | Number of Patients | ICG Dosage | ICG Injection Timing | Detection Rate (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD | CBD | CHD | ||||
| Intravenous injection | 12 | 2.5mg | 60 min before surgery | 83.3 | 83.3 | 83.3 |
| GB injection | 3 | 0.025mg | During Surgery | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| PTGBD injection | 8 | 0.025mg | During Surgery | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| ENBD injection | 1 | 0.025mg | During Surgery | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Abbreviations: GB, gallbladder; PTGBD, percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage; ENBD, endoscopic nasobiliary drainage; CD, cystic duct; CBD, common bile duct; CHD, common hepatic duct.
Visualization of the Anatomical Abnormality of Biliary Tract with Intraoperative Cholangiography
| Aberrant Cases | ICG Injection Root | Detection of Biliary Structure | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD | CBD | CHD | ||
| CD from RPB | Intravenous | Detected | Detected | Detected |
| CD from RPB | PTGBD | Detected | Detected | Detected |
| Low junction of CD | PTGBD | Detected | Detected | Detected |
| CD from RPB | Intravenous | Detected | Detected | Detected |
Abbreviations: CD, cystic duct; CBD, common bile duct; CHD, common hepatic duct; RPB, right posterior brunch; PTGBD, percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage.
Figure 1MRCP shows the cystic duct (CD) entering the right posterior branch (RPB) (A). The course of bile duct was confirmed by fluorescence after the intravenous injection of ICG. The CD running from the RPB and common hepatic duct (CBD) was confirmed (B).
Figure 2Case 2 MRCP shows the independent right posterior branch (RPB) entering the common hepatic duct (CBD), and the cystic duct (CD) branches off of the independent right posterior branch (A). The CD was confirmed by fluorescence after the direct injection of ICG into the gallbladder (B).
Figure 3Case 3 The tumor was located by the left Glissonian pedicle (A). The common hepatic duct (CBD) and left hepatic duct were visualized by the injection of ICG (B). The biliary structure was preserved and showed fluorescence after resecting tumor resection (C).
Relevant Articles About Fluorescence Cholangiography with Direct ICG Injection into Biliary Tract
| Study | Number of Patients | ICG Dosage | Identification Accuracy (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD | CBD | CHD | |||
| Graves | 11 | 0.25mg | 91.1% | N.D. | N.D. |
| Liu | 46 | 1.25mg | 32.6% before dissection | 58.6% before dissection | 45.6% before dissection |
| 84.7% after dissection | 78.2% after dissection | 73.9% after dissection | |||
| Quaresima | 44 | 0.2mg | 95.4% before dissection | 90.1% before dissection | 90.1% before dissection |
| 95.4% after dissection | 97.7% after dissection | 97.7% after dissection | |||
| Škrabec | 20 | 0.5–0.75mg | 80% | 56% | N.D. |
| Our cases | 12 | 0.025mg | 16.7% before dissection | 58.3% before dissection | 58.3% before dissection |
| 100% after dissection | 100% after dissection | 100% after dissection |
Abbreviations: CD, cystic duct; CBD, common bile duct; CHD, common hepatic duct.
Relevant Articles About Fluorescence Cholangiography with IV Injection
| Study | Number of Patients | ICG Dosage | Injection Timing | Identification Accuracy (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD | CBD | CHO | ||||
| lshizawa | 52 | 2.5mg | 30 min before Surgery | 100% before dissection | 96% before dissection | 100% after dissection |
| 100% after dissection | ||||||
| Aoki | 14 | 2.5mg | 30 min before Surgery | 71.40% | 71.40% | Not reported |
| Spinoglio | 45 | 2.5mg | 30–40 min before Surgery | 93% before dissection | 91% before dissection | 88% before dissection |
| 97% after dissection | 97% after dissection | 97% after dissection | ||||
| Daskalaki | 184 | 2.5mg | 45 min before Surgery | 97.80% | 96.10% | 94% |
| Larsen | 35 | 0.05mg/kgBW | After aneathesia induction | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Boni | 52 | 0.04mg/kgBW | At least 15 min before Surgery | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Osayi | 82 | 2.5mg | 60 min before Surgery | 56.1% before dissection | 37.8% before dissection | 35.4% before dissection |
| 95.1% after dissection | 76.8% after dissection | 69.5% after dissection | ||||
| van Dam | 30 | 0.05mg/kgBW | After aneathesia induction | 33.3% before dissection | 66.7% before dissection | Not reported |
| 96.7% after dissection | 86.7% after dissection | |||||
| Dip | 71 | 0.05mg/kgBW | 1 hour before Surgery | 100% before dissection | 87.3% before dissection | 70.4% before dissection |
| Diana | 54 | 0.1–0.4mg/kgBW | 45–60 min before Surgery | 98.20% | 98.20% | Not reported |
| Liu | 46 | 1.25mg | During Surgery | 32.6% before dissection | 58.6% before dissection | 45.6% before dissection |
| 84.7%after dissection | 78.2% after dissection | 73.9% after dissection | ||||
| Dip | 321 | 0.05mg/kgBW | 45 min before Surgery | 66.6% before dissection | 49.4% before dissection | 28.9% before dissection |
| 97.2% after dissection | 75.7% after dissection | 52.3% after dissection | ||||
Abbreviations: CD, cystic duct; CBD, common bile duct; CHD, common hepatic duct.
Visualization of the Biliary Tract with IV Injection
| Detection Rate with White Light (%) | Detection Rate with ICG Before Dissection (%) | Detection After Dissection (%) | Time to Detect After ICG Injection (mm:ss)(Mean±2SD) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD | 33.3 | 75 | 83.3 | 48:59±15:21 |
| CBD | 75 | 75 | 83.3 | 42:03±5:11 |
| CHD | 75 | 75 | 83.3 | 48:02±14:21 |
Abbreviations: CD, cystic duct; CBD, common bile duct; CHD, common hepatic duct.