| Literature DB >> 33958881 |
Reham Hammad1, Asmaa A Elmadbouly1, Inass Hassan Ahmad2, Shaymaa A Mohammed1, Nehal Farouk3, Zahraa Futooh4, Mohamed Omar Alfy5, Sarah Abozaid1, Eman F Mohamed6, Fatma M Kotb6, Alzahra Abdelbadea7, Nora Seliem7, Ahmed Elshafei8, Alya Mashaal9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The link between immune system and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) pathogenesis attracted attention to demonstrate the role of immune cells and their secreted cytokines in T2DM development and its subsequent foot complications.Entities:
Keywords: diabetic foot infection; diabetic foot ulcer; interferon gamma; interleukin 4; natural killer cell
Year: 2021 PMID: 33958881 PMCID: PMC8093190 DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S305511
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes ISSN: 1178-7007 Impact factor: 3.168
Figure 1Gating strategy for TNK cells detection. Initial gating of lymphocyte region on forward scatter/side scatter (FS/SS) (R1). TNK were defined as cells co-expressing CD16+CD56 and CD3 cells lying in upper right quadrant of the analysis plot, referred to by an arrow. An example of each group is illustrated.
Demographic and Clinical Data of Study Participants
| Count | % | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Females | 37 | 41.1% |
| Males | 53 | 58.9% | |
| Anti-diabetic drug | Insulin | 60 | 66.7% |
| Insulin + oral | 1 | 1.1% | |
| Oral | 29 | 32.2% | |
| Comorbidities | HTN | 22 | 24.4% |
| HTN+IHD | 5 | 5.6% | |
| IHD | 8 | 8.9% | |
| NIL | 55 | 61.1% | |
| Ulcers grading in DFU | Grade 1 | 8 | 13.3% |
| Grade 2 | 14 | 23.3% | |
| Ulcers grading in DFI | Grade 3 | 20 | 33.3% |
| Grade 4 | 18 | 30.0% | |
| Groups | Mean | SD | |
| Age (years) | DFI | 52.53 | 12.26 |
| DFU | 58.23 | 10.39 | |
| T2DM | 44.33 | 6.86 | |
| DM disease duration/year | DFI | 19.00 | 7.71 |
| DFU | 15.23 | 5.72 | |
| T2DM | 1.84 | 1.74 | |
Abbreviations: DM, diabetes mellitus; DFI, diabetic foot infection; DFU, diabetic foot ulcer; HTN, hypertension; IHD, ischemic heart disease.
Comparative Laboratory Data Between Groups
| Group 1=DFI | Group 2=DFU | Group 3=T2DM | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 1st Quartile | 3rd Quartile | Median | 1st Quartile | 3rd Quartile | Median | 1st Quartile | 3rd Quartile | ||
| TNK% | 2.65 | 1.70 | 4.00 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 8.00 | 8.25 | 6.50 | 10.00 | <0.001* |
| IFN-gamma (pg/mL) | 9.10 | 7.40 | 14.80 | 20.30 | 15.40 | 30.00 | 19.50 | 17.90 | 27.60 | <0.001* |
| IL4 (pg/mL) | 18.00 | 12.40 | 25.50 | 25.00 | 15.00 | 44.00 | 31.50 | 18.00 | 50.00 | 0.005* |
| IFN/gamma/IL4 | 0.53 | 0.40 | 0.82 | 1.20 | 0.39 | 1.90 | 0.74 | 0.39 | 1.40 | 0.025* |
| HbA1C % | 12.05 | 9.80 | 16.20 | 10.65 | 7.00 | 12.30 | 7.05 | 6.40 | 8.00 | <0.001* |
| TLC (103/µL) | 9.00 | 7.00 | 13.70 | 9.55 | 7.00 | 11.60 | 7.65 | 7.00 | 9.00 | 0.093 |
| PLT (103/µL) | 306.50 | 251.00 | 423.00 | 290.50 | 220.00 | 363.00 | 251.50 | 219.00 | 310.00 | 0.039* |
| S. Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.88 | 0.70 | 0.96 | 0.73 | 0.59 | 1.01 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.86 | 0.199 |
| S. LDL (mg/dL) | 110.00 | 96.00 | 145.00 | 88.50 | 45.00 | 127.00 | 85.00 | 65.00 | 124.00 | 0.102 |
| S. HDL (mg/dL) | 31.00 | 26.00 | 35.00 | 30.35 | 25.00 | 40.00 | 39.50 | 34.00 | 49.00 | 0.001* |
| S. TG (mg/dL) | 141.50 | 89.00 | 217.00 | 123.00 | 93.00 | 190.00 | 143.50 | 99.00 | 207.00 | 0.655 |
| S. CHO (mg/dL) | 149.50 | 111.00 | 191.00 | 136.00 | 112.00 | 183.00 | 186.50 | 167.00 | 223.00 | 0.003* |
Note: *Statistically significant (P-value<0.05).
Abbreviations: TLC, total leucocyte count; HbA1C, glycated Hgb; S. TG, serum triglyceride; S. HDL, serum high-density lipoprotein; S. LDL, serum low-density lipoprotein; S. CHO, serum cholesterol; IFN-γ, interferon-gamma; IL4, interleukin-4, IL4; TNK, T-natural killer cell.
Figure 2(A) Comparison of TNK% in studied groups. (B) Comparison of IFN-gamma/IL4 in studied groups. (C) Comparison of IFN-gamma in studied groups. (D) Comparison of IL4 in studied groups.
Figure 3(A) Correlation of TNK% with HbA1c revealed a significant negative correlation (−0.631, P<0.001). (B) Correlation of TNK% with LDL revealed a significant negative correlation (r=−0.261; P=0.013).
Output Data of ROC Curve for Discriminative Ability of Study Markers as Predictors of Infection in Diabetic Ulcer
| AUC | 95% Confidence Interval | Cutoff | Sensitivity % | Specificity % | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower Bound | Upper Bound | ||||||
| TNK% | 0.946 | <0.001* | 0.894 | 0.997 | 4.065 | 83.3 | 93.3 |
| IL4 (pg/mL) | 0.684 | 0.007* | 0.549 | 0.819 | 19.60 | 63.3 | 66.7 |
| IFN-γ (pg/mL) | 0.913 | <0.001* | 0.846 | 0.980 | 16.65 | 96.7 | 70 |
| IFN-γ/IL4 | 0.707 | 0.004* | 0.567 | 0.847 | 1.090 | 90 | 56.7 |
Note: *Statistically significant (P-value<0.05).
Abbreviations: IFN-γ, interferon-gamma; IL4, interleukin-4; TNK, T-natural killer cell.
Figure 4ROC curve for TNK%, IL4, IFN-gamma, IFN-gamma/IL4 as discriminators of infection between DFU and DFI.